Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 29 days, net -579. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 96,523–97,587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 08:41
96,884
-23
4 Sept 2026, 12:01
96,907
-67
3 Sept 2026, 14:01
96,974
-43
3 Sept 2026, 02:56
97,017
-44
2 Sept 2026, 04:34
97,061
-13
2 Sept 2026, 00:44
97,074
-59
1 Sept 2026, 07:45
97,133
-14
1 Sept 2026, 02:15
97,147
-15
31 Aug 2026, 07:13
97,162
-7
31 Aug 2026, 01:24
97,169
-102
30 Aug 2026, 09:12
97,271
-16
30 Aug 2026, 04:11
97,287
+641
29 Aug 2026, 11:43
96,646
-7
29 Aug 2026, 06:57
96,653
-26
28 Aug 2026, 09:47
96,679
+22
28 Aug 2026, 06:54
96,657
-43
27 Aug 2026, 11:04
96,700
+3
27 Aug 2026, 04:29
96,697
+39
26 Aug 2026, 09:44
96,658
-7
26 Aug 2026, 02:58
96,665
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 96,884 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,800
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held
48 (20 July 2026 – 5 September 2026)
Views total
506,360
Reactions total
6,134
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,990
Videos
≈418
Links
≈993
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,250 reactions across 48 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5449735142622906805
4,216
37.5%
custom 5447596412118261953
1,934
17.2%
custom 5298876263186846055
1,852
16.5%
custom 5231430673750839889
1,801
16.0%
❤
772
6.86%
👍
662
5.88%
👎
13
0.116%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Теперь в инвежене мое граффити ♥️🔥
Ваня Дмитриенко выступал сегодня на ежегодной вечеринке клуба (он был дважды в обзорах).
Ваня приятно удивил тем, что сам подошел познакомиться и кинуть респект. Оказывается он мой давний зритель. Хороший парень с большим будущим!
СКИНЧЕНДЖЕР СТАЛ ДОСТУПЕН ПРЯМО В ИГРЕ! 😎
Менять и настраивать скины теперь гораздо проще — просто введи в чат: !hub или !ws.
Новая функция будет доступна всем пользователям в течение дня. Ждём ваш фидбек об апдейте в комментариях 👇
РАСШИРЯЕМ ГЕОГРАФИЮ СЕРВЕРОВ! 😎
По вашим просьбам добавили новые локации — Ташкент, Улан-Батор, Амстердам, Люксембург и Копенгаген.
Выбирай ближайший и наслаждайся игрой!
GTA 6 понравилась, но показали слишком мало, чтобы делать какие-то выводы.
Сцена с разрушением машины от первого лица с пассажирского сиденья - прямо в сердечко. Хоть и понимаю, что это скрипт.
Но больше всего кайфую от резонанса вокруг трейлера. Netflix настолько хотел попасть в историю, что заплатил $80 млн за возможность показать его на 6 часов раньше остальных.
А после выхода трейлера легли Twitch, YouTube и с…
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @shoke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Aurora CS2 @AuroraTeam · 207,052 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
CYBERSHOKE @cybershoke · 223,236 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Дневник Симпла @s1mplegod123 · 248,247 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Ретейк @retakenews · 253,065 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
NEMIFIST @Nemifist · 85,930 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
AUNKERE @aunkeretg · 142,356 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
брил @breel · 45,658 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
Sashacheer @sashacheer · 47,580 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
REDDER 🔥 @romanredder · 84,227 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
CS СО СКИНАМИ 🔥 @cssoskinami · 45,574 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
CSGORUN @runcsgo · 85,398 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 18 August 2026
inkmate0 @inkmate1 · 68,038 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
Tweek @tweekgg · 126,386 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Nothing Team || Counter-Strike 2 @cs_limited · 47,238 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Подвал CS | Все о ТИР-2 сцене @tier2cs · 31,479 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
НАШ КС | CIS NEWS @cscis · 41,996 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
m0NESY NEWS @m0NESYGG · 125,875 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Boombl4 @Boombl4K · 34,740 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
ONLY CS2 · Counter-Strike 2 @csgo4love · 129,098 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
РАЙЗ ЛАВ Ю @raiz · 311,997 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
ТРУСЫ РАЙЗА @raiznews · 528,539 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 August 2026
CS2NEWS | Counter-Strike 2 @newcsgo · 583,980 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
СТАВОЧНАЯ АУНКЕРА 🤑 @aunkereEZ · 73,233 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
PARIVISION @parivision · 40,572 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 74 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЭРИК СУКА ШОКОВ” (@shoke), 96,884 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shoke.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.