Channel
@shotam18000
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,364subscribers
+655 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001409717506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shotam18000 |
| Created | 14 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shotam18000 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 23,364 | +56 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 23,308 | +52 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 23,256 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 23,254 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:53 | 23,252 | +100 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 23,152 | +12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 23,140 | +11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 23,129 | +23 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 23,106 | +11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 23,095 | +37 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 23,058 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 23,046 | +10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 23,036 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 23,033 | +22 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 23,011 | +55 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 22,956 | +20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 22,936 | +34 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 22,902 | +44 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 22,858 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 22,862 | first reading |
720 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 532 of 540 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 720 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,560,771 |
| Reactions total | 19,555 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 11:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26,837 reactions across 710 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 5,461 | 20.3% | |
| ❤ | 5,334 | 19.9% | |
| 🤬 | 3,853 | 14.4% | |
| 👍 | 3,373 | 12.6% | |
| 😢 | 2,996 | 11.2% | |
| 🔥 | 1,000 | 3.73% | |
| 🤡 | 732 | 2.73% | |
| 🤔 | 613 | 2.28% | |
| 🤯 | 494 | 1.84% | |
| 💔 | 484 | 1.80% | |
| 😱 | 429 | 1.60% | |
| 😭 | 419 | 1.56% | |
| 😁 | 257 | 0.958% | |
| 👎 | 166 | 0.619% | |
| 👏 | 149 | 0.555% | |
| 🥰 | 126 | 0.47% | |
| 😡 | 117 | 0.436% | |
| 🥴 | 100 | 0.373% | |
| 🫡 | 98 | 0.365% | |
| ❤🔥 | 97 | 0.361% | |
| 41 further kinds | 539 | 2.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 711 of the 720 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,837 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 720 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shotam18000. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 720 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 720 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🚂 Через безпекові міркування приміський поїзд №6302 «Христинівка – Черкаси» курсує зі Сміли із затримкою Нині затримка – одна година 51 хвилина. У разі оголошення підвищеної небезпеки потяг зупинять. 📲 Надіслати новину 👉 Підписуйся на "18000": новини, розслідування, події Черкас
❤1
🟢 Черкаська область - відбій повітряної тривоги!
🙏5👍3❤2
❗️ У росії розстріляли пілота, який обстрілював будинок в Умані, де загинуло 24 людини Йдеться про генерал‐майора ВКС рф Миколу Варпаховича. Він має підозру за обстріл «Охматдиту» та багатоповерхівки в Умані. Попередньо, замах скоїли сьогодні вранці біля приватного будинку генерала в селищі Пробудження Енгельського району. Невідомий підстеріг Варпаховича та відкрив по ньому вогонь. Нападник нібито здійснив два пост…
🔥111👏17❤5
🔴 Уманський район - повітряна тривога!
🙏10🤬6
🏥🌳 Біля Пʼятої поліклініки в Черкасах вирубали тополі. У мерії говорять: замість них облаштують парковку Як зʼясував «18000», протягом місяця у місті видалили 33 дерева на ділянці від вулиці Смілянської до Олени Теліги. Серед них – і тополі біля П’ятого центру первинної медико‐санітарної допомоги. У мерії стверджують: перед видаленням дерева біля поліклініки обстежила спеціальна комісія. Вона виявили аварійні та су…
🤬32🤔14👍12🤡8❤4
🏍 Реактивний БпЛА на Черкаси з півдня, – Повітряні Сили
🙏25🤬7😱2😁1
❗️Підвищена небезпека у Камʼянці, – Табурець Загроза застосування ворогом ударних БпЛА.
🤬17🙏13
🔴 Звенигородський район - повітряна тривога!
🙏17🤬8
❗️Нову схему ухилення від мобілізації викрили на Черкащині, – СБУ Відомо, що організувала схему голова ЛКК, яка є заступницею керівника одного із регіональних центрів первинної медичної допомоги. Вона встановлювала фіктивні групи інвалідності дітям військовозобов'язаних. До цього залучала й свою підлеглу – члена ЛКК, яка допомагала у виготовленні підробних меддовідок. Нині обом фігуранткам повідомили про підозру за…
🤬30👍6❤5😢4👎1😁1
🟡 Звенигородський й Уманський район - відбій повітряної тривоги!
🙏12❤3👍2
👀 Юного уманчанина підозрюють у погрозах дівчині та вимаганні 200 тисяч гривень Як розповіла поліцейським потерпіла, колишній товариш почав вимагати у неї кошти після конфлікту. Спочатку 21‐річна дівчина віддавала йому невеликі суми, однак згодом хлопець почав вимагати більше, погрожуючи фізичною розправою. 📲 Надіслати новину 👉 Підписуйся на "18000": новини, розслідування, події Черкас
🤬28🤯10💩3😭2
❗️Підвищена небезпека у Смілі, – Табурець Загроза застосування ворогом ударних БПЛА.
🙏24🤬8😭1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 720 posts we hold for @shotam18000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@shotam18000 edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“18000 | Шо там у Черкасах?” (@shotam18000), 23,364 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shotam18000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.