Первая в России школа помощи зависимым и их родственникам от нарколога Василия Шурова https://clck.ru/3PmY8m
Сотрудничество https://forms.amocrm.ru/rzdzmzd
Ресурс включён в перечень Роскомнадзора: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67ad2f95962afd032d92b5d8
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,983–27,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 13:21
27,113
-13
4 Nov 2026, 10:45
27,126
-16
3 Nov 2026, 07:59
27,142
+7
2 Nov 2026, 06:08
27,135
+20
1 Nov 2026, 05:18
27,115
-9
31 Oct 2026, 03:08
27,124
-2
29 Oct 2026, 23:47
27,126
+4
28 Oct 2026, 23:09
27,122
+4
27 Oct 2026, 20:27
27,118
+1
26 Oct 2026, 20:20
27,117
+36
25 Oct 2026, 22:06
27,081
+32
25 Oct 2026, 01:18
27,049
+29
23 Oct 2026, 22:45
27,020
-5
22 Oct 2026, 21:41
27,025
-14
21 Oct 2026, 16:36
27,039
-19
20 Oct 2026, 12:05
27,058
-22
19 Oct 2026, 13:16
27,080
-9
18 Oct 2026, 14:50
27,089
+8
17 Oct 2026, 17:28
27,081
-9
16 Oct 2026, 16:21
27,090
first reading
Engagement
387 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 140 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.26%
avg views ÷ 27,113 subscribers
Avg views / post
883
124 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.897%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 387 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 116 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
387 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
109,434
Reactions total
923
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,720
Videos
≈856
Links
≈2,510
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 54m
Average length
1m 59s
Measured directly from 118 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,067 reactions across 362 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,446
47.1%
🔥
916
29.9%
👍
250
8.15%
😁
129
4.21%
💯
71
2.31%
🙏
68
2.22%
😢
31
1.01%
💔
25
0.815%
🤣
25
0.815%
🤝
20
0.652%
🤯
14
0.456%
👏
13
0.424%
😱
11
0.359%
😭
9
0.293%
💊
7
0.228%
👀
5
0.163%
💘
5
0.163%
❤🔥
4
0.13%
🕊
4
0.13%
😐
3
0.098%
8 further kinds
11
0.359%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 363 of the 387 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 387 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 380 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shurovsos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 387 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.258%
1 of 387 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
895
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
838
over 379 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwneqbT
1
6 October 2026
6 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 387 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 126 posts held from the last 30 days (2.38%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🤩 Вчера вы были «женщиной мечты». Сегодня вы «неблагодарная». А вы всего лишь отказались от встречи.
Вы знакомы две недели. Он присылает цветы, пишет «я всю жизнь тебя искал» и уже говорит о совместной жизни. Вам приятно. Но одна деталь смущает: он так уверен, что вы идеально друг другу подходите, хотя ещё почти ничего о вас не знает.
Можно ли по такому началу распознать нарцисса? По подаркам и громким признаниям д…
🤩«Перестаньте всё за него делать». А если он забудет оплатить квартиру, долг ведь будет и моим?
Вы договорились, что в этом месяце за квартиру заплатит он. До пятницы ещё два дня, а вам уже хочется спросить: «Ты помнишь?» В прошлый раз он тоже обещал, а потом вам пришлось срочно искать деньги. К вечеру вы сами оплачиваете счёт. На минуту становится спокойнее. А следом приходит злость: «Почему опять я?»
Когда у вас …
🤩 «Если я не напомню — забудет. Если не проверю — не сделает».
И вот вы уже отвечаете за дело, которое другой взрослый обещал взять на себя.
В видео — знакомая последовательность: напомнила, проверила, сделала сама 🤖
Если узнаёте себя, заберите гайд «Когда забота превращается в контроль: 5 тревожных паттернов в отношениях».
🍀 Он сказал: «Я сделаю». А вы всё равно держите это в голове
Нужно напомнить. Потом уточнить. Проверить, не забыл ли.
И если дело всё ещё не сделано — заняться самой. Иначе опять придётся разбираться с последствиями.
Возможно, у вас уже был такой опыт: вы доверились, договорённость нарушили, а срочно решать проблему пришлось вам.
Поэтому просто перестать проверять трудно.
Но и продолжать так тяжело. Даже когда б…
🍀 Можно любить человека, злиться на него и не знать, что делать дальше
Иногда страшно рассказать не отдельный эпизод, а всю правду о жизни дома.
Что вы устали. Что злитесь. Что иногда не хотите возвращаться вечером. И что при этом любите близкого человека, переживаете за него и пока не готовы уходить.
Кажется, стоит начать говорить — и придётся либо защищать его: «Но он не всегда такой», либо оправдывать себя: «У …
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Все обсуждают, как провести выходной. Вы — в каком состоянии он будет
В семейном чате уже строят планы на 4 ноября.
Дети хотят в кино. Знакомые зовут встретиться: «Давайте хотя бы на пару часов». Кто-то предлагает просто погулять — обещают хорошую компанию.
Вы отвечаете: «Пока не знаю. Ближе к делу напишу».
Не потому, что вам никуда не хочется. Хочется. Но сначала нужно понять, в каком состоянии будет близкий чел…
🌔 «Если бы ты меня любила, ты бы согласилась». И вот вы уже оправдываетесь за своё «нет».
Вы собирались отказать. Но теперь чувствуете вину, объясняете свои планы и думаете: может, проще уступить?
❓ Можно ли изменить человека, который привык добиваться своего через давление? Одним правильным ответом — вряд ли. Но можно изменить своё участие в таком разговоре.
💗Назвать происходящее:
«Сейчас мне предлагают доказать …
🔥 «Я пришла из-за сына. А начала наконец делать что-то для себя».
Когда близкий употребляет, собственные вопросы часто откладываются: сначала разобраться с ним, убедить, помочь. А своя усталость, тревога и жизнь — потом.
Сегодня делимся отзывами участниц курса для близких зависимых. О том, что стало меняться, когда они обратились за поддержкой.
💬 О помощи себе
«Курс помог мне посмотреть на ситуацию с сыном другими…
Showing the 12 most recent of 387 posts we hold for @shurovsos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@shurovsos edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @shurovsos as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
33 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Polls
The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что сейчас мешает вашей семье обсуждать реабилитацию?
Не признаёт необходимость помощи.43%
Боится проживания в центре.13%
Не готов оставлять работу.30%
Не доверяет программам.26%
Не понимаем стоимость и условия.26%
Готов узнать больше, но пока не выбирали.9%
The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Думаю, что моя ситуация недостаточно серьёзная.20%
Переживаю из-за стоимости дальнейшей помощи.69%
Не понимаю, что будет после заявки.20%
Готов(а) обратиться.11%
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что вам говорят, когда вы пытаетесь рассказать, как вам тяжело?
«Он же сейчас не пьёт».14%
«Не накручивайте себя».24%
«У всех бывают проблемы».21%
«Радуйтесь, что стало лучше».5%
Меня выслушивают.17%
Я никому не рассказываю.38%
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что сейчас больше всего ограничивает ваши действия?
Анонимный опрос:
Деньги.54%
Жильё.21%
Дети и уход за близкими.9%
Давление родных.5%
Не понимаю, с чего начать.28%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 387 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@shurovsos named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Онлайн школа доктора Шурова” (@shurovsos), 27,113 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shurovsos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.