Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,280–22,817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:56
22,730
+1
15 Sept 2026, 15:21
22,729
+26
14 Sept 2026, 00:36
22,703
-2
12 Sept 2026, 04:59
22,705
+3
9 Sept 2026, 23:38
22,702
-32
6 Sept 2026, 14:00
22,734
-21
4 Sept 2026, 07:16
22,755
+1
2 Sept 2026, 17:14
22,754
+109
1 Sept 2026, 18:35
22,645
+173
31 Aug 2026, 22:05
22,472
+8
30 Aug 2026, 21:57
22,464
+20
30 Aug 2026, 00:35
22,444
+77
28 Aug 2026, 23:04
22,367
-7
27 Aug 2026, 23:17
22,374
-4
26 Aug 2026, 23:27
22,378
-6
25 Aug 2026, 23:25
22,384
-5
24 Aug 2026, 20:54
22,389
-13
23 Aug 2026, 05:23
22,402
+9
21 Aug 2026, 16:26
22,393
+51
20 Aug 2026, 14:04
22,342
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 22,730 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,750
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
43 (9 March 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
30,260
Reactions total
365
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24m 51s
Average length
2m 16s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,820 reactions across 42 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,531
84.1%
👍
152
8.35%
😢
116
6.37%
👏
21
1.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,820 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«تشعر بمرارة الحرمان عندما يُسلب منك الخشوع.
ذلك الخشوع الذي ذقت طعمه يوما ما، تحاول جاهدا أن تتكلف استدعاءه من داخلك، فلا تجد شيئا. فتعلم حينها أن الأمر ليس بيدك، بل بيد الله وحده، يمنّ به على من يشاء، متى شاء.
فلا تملك إلا أن تيأس من نفسك، وعلمك، وقدرتك، وتتوجه بكُلِّيتك إليه وحده، حزينا، منكسرا، خائفا، راجيا.. لتدب الحياة في أعماق القلب من جديد.»
بحمد الله تمّ لقاؤنا بالأمس بعنوان: «الصلاة أفقًا للمعرفة بالله»، وقريبًا يُنشر تسجيل اللقاء عبر قناة صِلَة على يوتيوب بإذن الله.
🟡شاركونا يا كِـرام في خانة التعليقات أبرز الفوائد التي لامست قلوبكم، والوقفات التي انتفعتم بها:
أحوال العابدين في استقبال الصلاة!
الأذان في قلوب العابدين نداء ينتزعهم من زحام الدنيا ويردّهم إلى مولاهم؛ فأحدهم عاهد نفسه أن يثب من مكانه فور سماعه، أيّاً كان شغله، فإذا أقبل ميقات الله توارت عنده كل الأشغال والمواقيت. وآخر يترك هاتفه في بيته وكل مايشغله في سيارته إذا هتف المؤذن للصلاة، ويدخل على ربه بقلب فارغ من كل شيء إلا من مولاه، وثالث قطع على نفسه وعداً ألا يدخل بفريضة إلا ويمهد لها بنافلة، يغسل بها قلبه قبل …
يسر قناة مبادرة صلة دعوتكم لحضور لقاء بعنوان: الصلاة أفقًا للمعرفة بالله.
🎙 تقديم الشيخ: يوسف بن عمر.
🗓 يوم الثلاثاء ١٤٤٨/٣/١٩ هـ، الساعة ٩:٠٠ مساءً -بتوقيت مكة المكرمة-.
🔹عن بُعد عبر التليقرام:
https://t.me/silllahs
لقاءٌ يتناول الصلاة بوصفها بابًا من أبواب المعرفة بالله، ويُجلّي ما تحمله من معانٍ تُعرّف العبد بربه، وتزيده حبًا وتعظيمًا له.
سرُ الخشوع.
قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: «وهو إشارة إلى المانع من حصول التأثير، وهو سهو القلب، وغيبته عن تعقل ما يُقال له والنظر فيه وتأمله، فإذا حصل المؤثر -وهو القرآن- والمحل القابل، وهو القلب الحي، ووجد الشرط، وهو الإصغاء، وانتفى المانع وهو اشتغال القلب وذهوله عن معنى الخطاب وانصرافه عنه إلى شيء آخر؛ حصل الأثر وهو الانتفاع والتذكر.»
⏺- الفوائد | ابن القيم.
وصية أبي حامد لكل راكع وساجد
قال رحمه الله: وأحضر قلبك ما أنت فيه، وفرّغه من الوسواس، وانظر بين يدي من تقوم، ومن تناجي، واستح أن تناجي مولاك بقلب غافل، وصدر مشحون بوساوس الدنيا وخبائث الشهوات. واعلم أنه تعالى مطلع على سريرتك وناظر إلى قلبك، فإنما يتقبل الله من صلاتك بقدر خشوعك وخضوعك وتواضعك وتضرعك، واعبده في صلاتك كأنك تراه؛ فإن لم تكن تراه فإنه يراك.
فإن لم يحضر قلبك ولم تسكن جوارحك لقصور معرفتك بجلال الله تعالى،…
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @silllahs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@silllahs edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مبادرة صِلـة” (@silllahs), 22,730 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/silllahs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.