Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
113 average views per post against 25,371 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.447%. Across the 6,272 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,202–31,620 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.50% and 23.3%, with a median of 11.6%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (24 September 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Posts measured
8 of 8 published in the window (8 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
907
Mature posts only
0.447% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 24 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
48 measurements spanning 78 days, net -1,736. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,111–27,367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 02:27
25,371
-33
23 Oct 2026, 01:10
25,404
-11
22 Oct 2026, 03:39
25,415
-23
20 Oct 2026, 18:41
25,438
-21
19 Oct 2026, 18:50
25,459
-26
18 Oct 2026, 19:08
25,485
-16
17 Oct 2026, 19:56
25,501
-23
16 Oct 2026, 17:55
25,524
-26
15 Oct 2026, 16:16
25,550
-25
14 Oct 2026, 19:26
25,575
-29
13 Oct 2026, 08:05
25,604
-77
9 Oct 2026, 01:36
25,681
-95
4 Oct 2026, 16:15
25,776
-144
26 Sept 2026, 16:35
25,920
-133
19 Sept 2026, 16:59
26,053
-61
17 Sept 2026, 06:56
26,114
-39
15 Sept 2026, 07:57
26,153
-39
13 Sept 2026, 14:00
26,192
-48
11 Sept 2026, 15:17
26,240
-72
9 Sept 2026, 03:40
26,312
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.447%
avg views ÷ 25,371 subscribers
Avg views / post
113
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026
Posts held
37 (5 July 2026 – 20 October 2026)
Views total
907
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
36
Videos
1
Links
116
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
314 reactions across 23 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
209
66.6%
💋
44
14.0%
❤🔥
18
5.73%
🔥
7
2.23%
🤔
7
2.23%
🤯
7
2.23%
👍
5
1.59%
🥰
5
1.59%
👏
3
0.955%
🙉
2
0.637%
🆒
1
0.318%
🍾
1
0.318%
💘
1
0.318%
😁
1
0.318%
😢
1
0.318%
🤝
1
0.318%
🤣
1
0.318%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 20 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Блин, опять впн не работает...
Знакомо?) А мне с этим впном нет🙃
📡 Обходки глушилок и белых списков
🌎 Разные локации
💻 Бесконечное количество устройств
🌐 Безлимит на трафик(обходки тоже безлимит)
💛 SAVE VPN — ЛУЧШИЙ ВПН!
Попробуй бесплатно👇
⚡️Люсию из GTA VI слили полностью голой в 4К
На видео она без трусов садится на камеру, всё это с максимальной детализацией – видны даже мурашки на коже
Фулл здесь: https://t.me/+8Y3QfPu0SCY2OTIy
VPN С ОБХОДОМ БЕЛЫХ СПИСКОВ И ГЛУШИЛОК 🛜
В твоем регионе глушат мобильную сеть и всё перестало работать?
Вот гайд на обход:
1️⃣ Переходим в бота: @AtlantaVPN_bot
2️⃣ Получаем БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ ключ за подписку на тгк
3️⃣ Подключаем ключ в Happ / INCY
5️⃣ Тестируем сервера
Ловит даже на парковке 🚗
Подключить бесплатно сейчас: @AtlantaVPN 💰
⚡ БЕЛЫЕ СПИСКИ – ВСЁ
🔖 В России появился VPN, который оператор связи в принципе не видит.
Называется Green VPN. Работает на мобильном, на домашнем, на роутере. Пробивает белые списки в любом регионе.
🔖 Глава Билайна сам признал – технически отличить такой VPN от обычного интернета операторы не могут. Именно поэтому заблокировать его можно только вместе с Яндексом.
💚 2 дня бесплатно → @GreenVPN
🟢 Orbit VPN — ВПН из белых списков, который работает всегда и везде, при любых блокировках интернета.
⛔ Обходит ЛЮБЫЕ блокировки
⏩ Быстро грузит 💬📷🎥💬💬
🥷 Убирает рекламу на 📺 🎵 🎶
🚀 Скорость 25 Гбит/с
🌎 100+ серверов под любые задачи
🛍️ Поддержка любых устройств
🤝 За приглашённых друзей 15% навсегда от всех их трат
😎 Дешевле 95% VPN на рынке
💳 Цена от 99 рублей в месяц
🎁 Для тебя - пробный период!
🧡 Orbit VPN - лучши
Блин, опять впн не работает...
Знакомо?) А мне с этим впном нет🙃
📡 Обходки глушилок и белых списков
🌎 Разные локации
💻 Бесконечное количество устройств
🌐 Безлимит на трафик(обходки тоже безлимит)
💛 SAVE VPN — ЛУЧШИЙ ВПН!
Попробуй бесплатно👇
Я рассталась со своим парнем, потому что узнала в таро боте что изменил😭😭 и это оказалось правдой
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @sovvetgl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sovvetgl named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@seady named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@greenvpn named in 1 post, 11 October 2026 – 11 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ВОЙНА НА УКРАИНЕ СВО УКРАИНА @novostydhd · 54,870 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ежедневное напоминание” (@sovvetgl), 25,371 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sovvetgl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.