Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for StepLeaks

Channel

StepLeaks

@stepleaker

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

38,212subscribers

-598 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001917653067
TypeChannel
Username@stepleaker
DescriptionStepOnward to leaks. Chat: t.me/stepleaker_chat
Created26 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 October 2026
Measurements held53
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/stepleaker

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

38,21238,88438,5486 August 2026 — 38,810 subscribers7 August 2026 — 38,851 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,867 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,884 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,881 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,876 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,875 subscribers13 August 2026 — 38,871 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,860 subscribers16 August 2026 — 38,852 subscribers17 August 2026 — 38,839 subscribers18 August 2026 — 38,833 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,830 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,821 subscribers21 August 2026 — 38,806 subscribers22 August 2026 — 38,784 subscribers24 August 2026 — 38,762 subscribers25 August 2026 — 38,745 subscribers26 August 2026 — 38,718 subscribers27 August 2026 — 38,706 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,699 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,678 subscribers30 August 2026 — 38,651 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,641 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,623 subscribers2 September 2026 — 38,611 subscribers3 September 2026 — 38,607 subscribers5 September 2026 — 38,565 subscribers9 September 2026 — 38,518 subscribers11 September 2026 — 38,797 subscribers13 September 2026 — 38,815 subscribers14 September 2026 — 38,803 subscribers16 September 2026 — 38,795 subscribers19 September 2026 — 38,759 subscribers26 September 2026 — 38,677 subscribers4 October 2026 — 38,560 subscribers9 October 2026 — 38,519 subscribers13 October 2026 — 38,451 subscribers14 October 2026 — 38,443 subscribers15 October 2026 — 38,423 subscribers16 October 2026 — 38,412 subscribers17 October 2026 — 38,394 subscribers18 October 2026 — 38,375 subscribers19 October 2026 — 38,356 subscribers20 October 2026 — 38,340 subscribers21 October 2026 — 38,324 subscribers22 October 2026 — 38,300 subscribers23 October 2026 — 38,283 subscribers24 October 2026 — 38,263 subscribers25 October 2026 — 38,254 subscribers26 October 2026 — 38,239 subscribers27 October 2026 — 38,226 subscribers29 October 2026 — 38,212 subscribers6 August 202629 October 2026
53 measurements spanning 83 days, net -598. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,111–38,985 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Oct 2026, 02:5038,212-14
27 Oct 2026, 22:2038,226-13
26 Oct 2026, 20:1938,239-15
25 Oct 2026, 22:5938,254-9
24 Oct 2026, 20:2738,263-20
23 Oct 2026, 17:2638,283-17
22 Oct 2026, 19:1738,300-24
21 Oct 2026, 18:0038,324-16
20 Oct 2026, 14:2938,340-16
19 Oct 2026, 15:3038,356-19
18 Oct 2026, 13:1638,375-19
17 Oct 2026, 15:4438,394-18
16 Oct 2026, 14:4638,412-11
15 Oct 2026, 14:3138,423-20
14 Oct 2026, 17:0838,443-8
13 Oct 2026, 08:3038,451-68
9 Oct 2026, 01:2138,519-41
4 Oct 2026, 14:5538,560-117
26 Sept 2026, 08:4138,677-82
19 Sept 2026, 10:0238,759first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 7 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 156 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
303
Videos
60
Links
77

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6,509 reactions across 22 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,86528.7%
👎96814.9%
🔥78312.0%
👍76211.7%
🤯5628.63%
🤔4236.50%
😭3485.35%
😱1291.98%
🤓1081.66%
🥰681.04%
🤨570.876%
🌭430.661%
🎉430.661%
🤷410.63%
🐳330.507%
😁310.476%
❤‍🔥300.461%
🥴260.399%
🤪240.369%
💯220.338%
23 further kinds1432.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,509 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2025 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 22 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stepleaker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 September 2025 to 10 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 17:25 UTC≈27,900 views448 reactionsread 29 October 2026
Photo

【 Wuthering Waves - Lily Exclusive Preview 】

❤309👎49😭39🔥17👍11🤔11❤‍🔥3🤨3

8 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈36,400 views242 reactionsread 29 October 2026

【 Wuthering Waves - ███████ Day 3 】 Black Swan

🔥124🤔52❤19🤨19👎15🤯6🥴3❤‍🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC≈34,600 views198 reactionsread 29 October 2026

【 Wuthering Waves - ███████ Day 2 】 i can see the... strands of lavender hair kissed by pink;

🤔139❤20🥰15👎9❤‍🔥6💊5🐳3⚡1

5 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈32,700 views433 reactionsread 29 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭275🤯45🌭43👎22🤔17😁14❤9💘3

5 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC≈32,200 views141 reactionsread 29 October 2026

【 Wuthering Waves - ███████ Day 1 】 let's see.. does a black and white gothic dress ring any bells?

🤔103❤20👎10🥰5👏3

4 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈34,100 views312 reactionsread 29 October 2026

【 Wuthering Waves - ███████ Day 0 】 well.. she's pretty. it's like they say, the most beautiful lilies bloom in silence..

❤170🤔86🤨24🎉8👨‍💻6😱6❤‍🔥3🤯3

23 May 2026, 19:15 UTC≈113,000 views534 reactionsread 29 October 2026

【 Genshin Impact - 7.0 Crumbs 】 • Traveler and Paimon travel by train across the frozen wastes of Snezhnaya accompanied by a sentient consciousness residing in a pair of goggles known as "Grey-Eye" • They are traveling to the Palace of the White Crown, which serves as the tomb for the previous Cryo Archon, known as the White Tsar. • Through visions of the past within a Shadow Realm, the Traveler learns that 500 ye…

👎269😱123❤91🔥15🤯9🥴9👍5🤔5

12 Mar 2026, 18:24 UTC≈91,600 views469 reactions1 Starread 29 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤯325❤94🥰18👎15🔥6❤‍🔥4🎉2👍2

3 Jan 2026, 12:37 UTC≈100,000 views255 reactionsread 29 October 2026

What do you think?

👍140👎61🤪24❤10💊9👀6😁3💅2

3 Jan 2026, 12:37 UTC≈85,500 views1,035 reactions1 Starread 29 October 2026
Forwarded from @merlin_impact

Was Stepleaker actually the most reliable Wuwa leaker?

👍572👎300🤷41🤓27❤24😭24💯22🔥10

31 Dec 2025, 19:05 UTC≈84,500 views589 reactions2 Starsread 29 October 2026

Happy New Year! May more leaks appear this year 🌷

❤446🤓66🎉31👎14🔥12🍾8🥰4😇3

10 Sept 2025, 21:13 UTC≈137,000 views220 reactionsread 29 October 2026

【 Wuthering Waves - 2.7.0 】 - encore.moe has been updated to version 2.7.0! Please check it out at: encore.moe/character/1411 / encore.moe/character/1208.

❤154👎15😭10🎃8🔥7🤨7😁6✍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @stepleaker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“StepLeaks” (@stepleaker), 38,212 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stepleaker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.