Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MeroMero

Channel

MeroMero

@merlin_impact

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,788subscribers

+1,530 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001887449778
TypeChannel
Username@merlin_impact
Created23 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/merlin_impact

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

29,200 average views per post against 42,788 subscribers — an engagement rate of 68.3%. Across the 3,660 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,627–99,991 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.74% and 11.1%, with a median of 5.02%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (12 August 2026 11 September 2026)
Posts measured28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled818,280
Mature posts only96.2% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers42,788 measured 10 September 2026
Cohortb31623:eng · 3,660 channels · p10 0.431% · p25 1.74% · p50 5.02% · p75 11.1% · p90 21.2%
Position in cohort99.699th percentile · 13.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.018% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 11 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

41,21442,94642,0806 August 2026 — 41,258 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,252 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,245 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,230 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,214 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,509 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,531 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,351 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,760 subscribers15 August 2026 — 42,887 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,924 subscribers17 August 2026 — 42,928 subscribers18 August 2026 — 42,942 subscribers19 August 2026 — 42,946 subscribers20 August 2026 — 42,944 subscribers21 August 2026 — 42,939 subscribers23 August 2026 — 42,933 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,925 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,933 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,931 subscribers29 August 2026 — 42,925 subscribers29 August 2026 — 42,912 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,904 subscribers31 August 2026 — 42,898 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,885 subscribers2 September 2026 — 42,862 subscribers4 September 2026 — 42,856 subscribers7 September 2026 — 42,827 subscribers10 September 2026 — 42,788 subscribers42,7886 August 202610 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net +1,530. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,954–43,206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 04:4042,788-39
7 Sept 2026, 01:3842,827-29
4 Sept 2026, 10:2042,856-6
2 Sept 2026, 19:4642,862-23
1 Sept 2026, 16:1342,885-13
31 Aug 2026, 18:4842,898-6
30 Aug 2026, 21:1742,904-8
29 Aug 2026, 23:4242,912-13
29 Aug 2026, 01:2842,925-6
28 Aug 2026, 00:4342,931-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:5542,933+8
25 Aug 2026, 00:3542,925-8
23 Aug 2026, 10:1742,933-6
21 Aug 2026, 22:0842,939-5
20 Aug 2026, 19:5342,944-2
19 Aug 2026, 22:2642,946+4
18 Aug 2026, 22:3442,942+14
17 Aug 2026, 20:3542,928+4
16 Aug 2026, 20:4842,924+37
15 Aug 2026, 11:5642,887first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
101.8%
avg views ÷ 42,788 subscribers
Avg views / post
43,600
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.391%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held56 (13 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total479,200
Reactions total1,873
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
777
Videos
582
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 33s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,465 reactions across 56 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,52733.9%
🔥1,19616.0%
😱97013.0%
👍5787.74%
❤‍🔥4726.32%
🗿3164.23%
💋2593.47%
🤨2082.79%
🕊1972.64%
🥰1692.26%
🤔1471.97%
🤩811.09%
🍓781.04%
👀530.71%
💘500.67%
😍400.536%
🤗320.429%
👏250.335%
🎉160.214%
🐳100.134%
10 further kinds410.549%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,465 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 56 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @merlin_impact. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 04:11 UTC≈17,600 views282 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Bro, whats wrong with people? Thats literally the only thing implemented in the game. The devs are stripping data and assets to prevent leaks, but somehow people think this is milking.

232🗿21🔥19👍4🍾3🤨3

26 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈22,000 views134 reactionsread 11 September 2026

slopposting

🔥110🗿11🤩75😈1

26 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈22,100 views342 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Its funny seeing people call Nodusfall AI slop (it is), but instead of pointing out the parts that are actually AI slop, people seem to think its AI slop because of the visuals - the part that was actually made by humans. Realistic graphics dont automatically mean AI slop. Most of the time, it just means UE5 slop.

255🗿40👍28👏13🔥3💘2😈1

13 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC≈86,300 views654 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Video

Bro thinks he is an atom

👍395😱14472🗿14🔥10😍6🆒6🐳3

13 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC≈35,700 views104 reactionsread 11 September 2026

it has pvp team deathmatch mode

😱809👍6🔥3🗿3🤔3

13 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC≈31,900 views57 reactionsread 11 September 2026

kl = nodusfall = weavers = this game

🤔43👍8🤨42

13 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC≈56,000 views59 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥43🤔96🗿1

13 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC≈57,900 views50 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

31🔥9🤔9👏1

13 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC≈54,800 views54 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤔2712😱8🔥6❤‍🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC≈49,800 views49 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤔27🔥157

13 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC≈45,100 views88 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

from Uncle Lazy

🔥70🤔125🤨1

12 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈15,500 views300 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

And yes, it works in fontain too. I just dont want to record it bc her hair and other parts have no proper animations in this beta.

254🔥26🎉16👍2🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @merlin_impact. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Zani's oppai mole
@zanisOppai · 4,034
#1
Sakura Haven
@sakurahaven · 43,485
#2

@PlumTeamLeaks · 9,238
#3
Wuthering Waves | WuWa News | WuWa Updates
@waves_wuthering · 29,795
#4
Nurinoue
@hi3leaks · 5,057
#5
Геншин Импакт | Бледная
@blednayaleaks_genshin · 110,467
#6
Ростик и лунная жызнь
@yenselife · 11,308
#7
Хонкай: Стар Рейл | Бледная
@blednayaleaks_hsr · 66,807
#8
Genshin Leakflow
@GenshinLeakflow · 43,994
#9
Reddit | Genshin Leaks
@genshinreddit · 51,485
#10
Вести от Паймон
@paimon_leaks · 126,806
#11
Genshin Impact [RC]
@GenshinRC · 221,853
#12
Genshin Impact RU
@genshin_impact_ru_off · 477,019
#13
Библиотека Лизы 📚 Genshin Impact
@slivu_genshin_impact · 200,409
#14
Honkai: Star Rail RU
@honkaistarrailofficial · 234,449
#15
Honkai: Star Rail | Миря
@honkai_star_rail_leaks · 42,324
#16
WuWa Land | Wuthering Waves
@wuwaland · 35,444
#17
Zenless Zone Zero - Zeta
@ZZZzetachannel · 11,978
#18
Wuthering Waves
@wutheringwaves · 158,396
#19
Reddit | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsrreddit · 32,640
#20
Сливы по ZZZ
@leaks_zenless · 5,942
#21
Zenless Zone Zero | iNFO
@Zenless_Zone_Zero_Info · 104,444
#22
Genshin Media
@genshinmedia · 158,687
#23
HXG’s Channel
@HXG_Channel · 55,232
#24
小灯泡Gularico
@divaleaks · 2,295
#25
Honkai: Star Rail | iNFO
@honkai_star · 115,979
#26
Genshin Impact Lore
@genshin_lore · 87,970
#27
Reddit | Zenless
@zenlessleak · 24,276
#28
Сплетник Фатуи | Сливы Геншин Импакт
@spletnik_fatui · 13,129
#29
🌒 Ирминсуль Луна | milay
@milayirminsul · 2,512
#30
Zenless Zone Zero | Миря
@zenless_zone_leaks · 10,453
#31
Genshin Stellar Honey️❄️
@GenshinHoney · 14,234
#32
Ванильные Сливки | Genshin Impact
@vanileaks · 659,304
#33
AstraLore
@astralore · 18,182
#34
Reddit | Genshin Impact
@redditgenshin · 29,577
#35
GL1n
@gl1n_impact · 51,398
#36
Ванильный Хонкай | Honkai: Star Rail
@vanihsr · 247,724
#37
Fact Honkai: Star Rail
@fact_honkaistarrail · 19,426
#38
The Lament Archive | WuWa
@dailywuthering · 4,133
#39
Fact Zenless Zone Zero
@fact_zzz · 6,937
#40
Эй, Вадимчик | Genshin Impact
@hey_vadimchik · 19,808
#41
Пророчества Лунного Интейвата 🌙 | Genshin Impact
@inteyvatleaks · 8,974
#42
Honkai: Star Rail Italia - Leaks 🇮🇹
@StarRailLeaks · 12,834
#43
Компаньон Паймон!
@paimon_impact · 28,249
#44
Геншин Дроп / GenshinDrop.io - кейсы с примогемами Геншин Импакт 💎
@genshindropcom · 490,684
#45
Союз ХОРНИ архонта
@ARCHorny_union · 40,620
#46
Fact Genshin Impact
@fact_impact · 15,926
#47
Мнимый уголок | Honkai: Star Rail
@imaginarycorner · 9,257
#48
Новости Genshin Impact | GI News
@GenshinImpactNewsGI3 · 121,713
#49
Тери-Тери! ⚡️ Honkai Impact 3rd
@yukimy3rd · 12,420
#50
AxeSay (Yasexa) 🇨🇳
@AxeSay · 74,407
#51
Wuthering Waves | Новая увертюра
@wuthering_waves_lore · 19,791
#52
Waileaks | Honkai Impact 3rd
@waileaks · 2,630
#53
Genshin Null
@GenshinNull · 6,178
#54
Revue Impact
@revueimpact · 2,629
#55
Muuurrchik
@muuurrchik · 47,910
#56
原神内鬼吧
@yuanshen_games_leaks · 3,593
#57
IX|Archive
@ninthspace · 1,774
#58
Ветерок Мондштадта | Genshin Impact 🍃
@impact_genshin · 107,720
#59
Wuthering Waves | iNFO
@wuthering_waves_info · 49,918
#60
Thereallo LLC
@PlayerGetTokenReq · 646
#61
Honkai: Утечки от Байлу | HSR
@Honkai_utechki · 60,095
#62
Honkai Impact 3rd | iNFO
@honkai_impact_info · 20,147
#63
Zenless Zone Zero
@Zenless_Zone_Zero · 70,183
#64

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Sakura Haven
@sakurahaven · 43,485
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 2 September 2026
Wuthering Waves | WuWa News | WuWa Updates
@waves_wuthering · 29,795
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 September 2026
HXG’s Channel
@HXG_Channel · 55,232
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 2 September 2026
WuWa Land | Wuthering Waves
@wuwaland · 35,444
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
Reddit | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsrreddit · 32,640
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
Reddit | Genshin Impact
@redditgenshin · 29,577
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
Компаньон Паймон!
@paimon_impact · 28,249
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MeroMero” (@merlin_impact), 42,788 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/merlin_impact.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.