Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sakura Haven

Channel

Sakura Haven

@sakurahaven

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

43,513subscribers

+285 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002078590466
TypeChannel
Username@sakurahaven
DescriptionShitpost channel: https://t.me/sakurahavenshitpost Regarding advertising and collaborations, also if you want to share beta/media/early/dev/sus things about Hoyo games, write here: @sakurahavenalt
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sakurahaven

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

23,700 average views per post against 43,513 subscribers — an engagement rate of 54.5%. Across the 3,690 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,625–99,947 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.72% and 11.0%, with a median of 5.05%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured37 of 37 published in the window (0 exact, 37 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled877,470
Mature posts only55.1% over 36 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers43,513 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb31623:eng · 3,690 channels · p10 0.393% · p25 1.72% · p50 5.05% · p75 11.0% · p90 21.6%
Position in cohort99.485th percentile · 10.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.069% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

43,03843,53343,285.57 August 2026 — 43,228 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,228 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,218 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43,201 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43,182 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,169 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,154 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,149 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,133 subscribers16 August 2026 — 43,142 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,146 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,136 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,132 subscribers20 August 2026 — 43,122 subscribers21 August 2026 — 43,110 subscribers22 August 2026 — 43,089 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,068 subscribers25 August 2026 — 43,058 subscribers26 August 2026 — 43,038 subscribers27 August 2026 — 43,094 subscribers28 August 2026 — 43,228 subscribers29 August 2026 — 43,296 subscribers30 August 2026 — 43,323 subscribers31 August 2026 — 43,397 subscribers1 September 2026 — 43,426 subscribers2 September 2026 — 43,451 subscribers3 September 2026 — 43,466 subscribers6 September 2026 — 43,447 subscribers9 September 2026 — 43,485 subscribers11 September 2026 — 43,533 subscribers13 September 2026 — 43,528 subscribers17 September 2026 — 43,524 subscribers19 September 2026 — 43,513 subscribers43,5137 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,964–43,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:5643,513-11
17 Sept 2026, 00:0143,524-4
13 Sept 2026, 17:2243,528-5
11 Sept 2026, 23:5843,533+48
9 Sept 2026, 16:3643,485+38
6 Sept 2026, 05:3943,447-19
3 Sept 2026, 23:0243,466+15
2 Sept 2026, 11:4343,451+25
1 Sept 2026, 14:0543,426+29
31 Aug 2026, 16:3743,397+74
30 Aug 2026, 14:4743,323+27
29 Aug 2026, 13:3543,296+68
28 Aug 2026, 13:0343,228+134
27 Aug 2026, 09:4243,094+56
26 Aug 2026, 06:4543,038-20
25 Aug 2026, 08:3243,058-10
24 Aug 2026, 08:4343,068-21
22 Aug 2026, 19:1843,089-21
21 Aug 2026, 12:5543,110-12
20 Aug 2026, 14:2243,122first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.5%
avg views ÷ 43,513 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,300
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held52 (31 July 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total814,600
Reactions total3,342
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 22:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,250
Videos
≈141
Links
≈56

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 50s
Average length
2m 50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,801 reactions across 52 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,57932.9%
🔥53711.2%
😭49710.4%
🤮4719.81%
🤯3707.71%
👎2675.56%
😱1513.15%
🤔1432.98%
😁1322.75%
🤡1112.31%
👍1062.21%
🤣491.02%
🥰460.958%
❤‍🔥450.937%
💩400.833%
😴330.687%
🖕280.583%
🗿280.583%
🤨260.542%
👀250.521%
18 further kinds1172.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,801 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 16:11 UTC≈19,500 views37 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

[HSR] HQ

❤26🥰6😭2💘1😍1😘1

19 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC≈14,200 views68 reactionsread 20 September 2026

[HSR] Character Kit For the next little while any kits posted by us are being posted for preservation/record keeping purposes. Any notes will be attached to the characters as we deem necessary. ??? Star - Fisherman | Ice ??? Note: This Character is likely pretty old. We don't have much info on it other than it's at least confirmed to be from somewhere between 2.0 to now. If you have any ideas as to which released …

❤36🤡14🤔5💩4🤨4🍌2🐳1👎1

19 Sept 2026, 08:03 UTC≈11,100 views95 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

[HSR] Character Kits For the next little while any kits posted by us are being posted for preservation/record keeping purposes. Any notes will be attached to the characters as we deem necessary.

👍58❤16🖕7🤮5🤯4🍌2💘2🔥1

15 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC≈20,700 views255 reactionsread 20 September 2026

[HSR] Character Kit For the next little while any kits posted by us are being posted for preservation/record keeping purposes. Any notes will be attached to the characters as we deem necessary. 5 Star - Mr Reca | Physical Nihility Note: This is LIKELY Mr Reca's kit had he released back when he was supposed to but we don't have confirmation of that for sure. There is no indication atm either way regarding his poten…

😭197❤27💩17🤣6🫡6💘1🤬1

15 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC≈14,600 views555 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥279🤮185❤38😭17🥰12🖕6😍6😁5

13 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC≈15,300 views14 reactionsread 20 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤11❤‍🔥2😴1

13 Sept 2026, 17:03 UTC≈12,800 views10 reactionsread 20 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤9😴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @sakurahaven. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sakurahaven edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 September 2026
Most recent edit
9 September 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Zani's oppai mole
@zanisOppai · 4,024
#1
Honkai: Star Rail Italia - Leaks 🇮🇹
@StarRailLeaks · 12,857
#2
Honkai: Star Rail - INDONESIA 🇮🇩
@hsrid · 1,877
#3
MeroMero
@merlin_impact · 42,689
#4
Zenless Zone Zero - Zeta
@ZZZzetachannel · 12,132
#5
ㅤ
@PlumTeamLeaks · 9,171
#6
Хонкай: Стар Рейл | Бледная
@blednayaleaks_hsr · 66,649
#7
Reddit | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsrreddit · 32,521
#8
Wuthering Waves | WuWa News | WuWa Updates
@waves_wuthering · 29,943
#9
Nurinoue
@hi3leaks · 5,051
#10
HXG’s Channel
@HXG_Channel · 55,494
#11
Ванильный Хонкай | Honkai: Star Rail
@vanihsr · 248,727
#12
Максик | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsr_is_real · 3,288
#13
Honkai: Утечки от Байлу | HSR
@Honkai_utechki · 59,926
#14
Genshin Stellar Honey️❄️
@GenshinHoney · 11,931
#15
Honkai: Star Rail Новости | HSR News
@HonkaiStarRailNewsHsr · 69,754
#16
HSR | Kira
@hsr_kira · 2,242
#17
小灯泡Gularico
@divaleaks · 2,287
#18
Genshin Leakflow
@GenshinLeakflow · 44,335
#19
Honkai: Star Rail | Миря
@honkai_star_rail_leaks · 3
#20
Ростик и лунная жызнь
@yenselife · 11,305
#21
Геншин Импакт | Бледная
@blednayaleaks_genshin · 110,463
#22
Honkai: Star Rail RU
@honkaistarrailofficial · 234,304
#23
WuWa Land | Wuthering Waves
@wuwaland · 35,408
#24
Станція Герта | українськомовний Honkai: Star Rail
@HertaStationUA · 7,432
#25
Zenless Zone Zero | Миря
@zenless_zone_leaks · 10,455
#26
Waileaks | Honkai Impact 3rd
@waileaks · 2,626
#27
Reddit | Genshin Leaks
@genshinreddit · 51,601
#28
Honkai: Star Rail | iNFO
@honkai_star · 115,481
#29
Zenless Zone Zero | iNFO
@Zenless_Zone_Zero_Info · 104,366
#30
IX|Archive
@ninthspace · 1,776
#31
Reddit | Zenless
@zenlessleak · 24,432
#32
Сплетник Фатуи | Сливы Геншин Импакт
@spletnik_fatui · 13,176
#33
Wuthering Waves
@wutheringwaves · 157,436
#34
Genshin Impact [RC]
@GenshinRC · 220,142
#35
Сливы по ZZZ
@leaks_zenless · 5,931
#36
The Lament Archive | WuWa
@dailywuthering · 4,126
#37
Thereallo LLC
@PlayerGetTokenReq · 644
#38
AstraLore
@astralore · 18,148
#39
Ванильные Сливки | Genshin Impact
@vanileaks · 665,642
#40
Genshin Impact RU
@genshin_impact_ru_off · 478,239
#41
Вести от Паймон
@paimon_leaks · 124,772
#42
Библиотека Лизы 📚 Genshin Impact
@slivu_genshin_impact · 199,792
#43
HoYoverse | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsr_newss · 29,565
#44
Genshin Null
@GenshinNull · 6,148
#45
Genshin Media
@genshinmedia · 158,040
#46
Мнимый уголок | Honkai: Star Rail
@imaginarycorner · 9,234
#47
Honkai Star Rail Revengers
@Honkai_Star_Rail_Revengers · 449
#48
原神内鬼吧
@yuanshen_games_leaks · 3,573
#49
Fact Honkai: Star Rail
@fact_honkaistarrail · 19,370
#50
Тери-Тери! ⚡️ Honkai Impact 3rd
@yukimy3rd · 12,417
#51
Золотой Двор | Honkai Impact 3rd Lore
@hi3lore · 8,602
#52
Wuthering Waves Legacy
@Wuthering_Waves_Legacy · 9,198
#53
Жилой комплекс "Авокадыш"
@avocado_3rd · 326
#54
Геншин Дроп / GenshinDrop.io - кейсы с примогемами Геншин Импакт 💎
@genshindropcom · 484,449
#55
Пом-Пом вещает | Honkai Star Rail
@honkai_star_rail_pompom · 25,322
#56
Wuthering Waves Italia 🇮🇹 | News 🗞️
@WutheringWavesExtra · 2,998
#57

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MeroMero
@merlin_impact · 42,689
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
Wuthering Waves | WuWa News | WuWa Updates
@waves_wuthering · 29,943
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 September 2026
HXG’s Channel
@HXG_Channel · 55,494
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 2 September 2026
WuWa Land | Wuthering Waves
@wuwaland · 35,408
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
Reddit | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsrreddit · 32,521
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
Раскрываем потанцевал
@olezha_HSR · 30,561
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sakura Haven” (@sakurahaven), 43,513 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sakurahaven.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.