Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dim

Channel

Dim

@notdim

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

61,848subscribers

+1,028 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002106792172
TypeChannel
Username@notdim
Created16 December 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 October 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/notdim

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

35,600 average views per post against 61,856 subscribers — an engagement rate of 57.6%. Across the 3,629 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,921 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.78% and 11.0%, with a median of 5.12%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (14 September 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Posts measured34 of 34 published in the window (0 exact, 34 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,211,300
Mature posts only57.6% over 34 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers61,856 measured 14 October 2026
Cohortb31623:eng · 3,629 channels · p10 0.466% · p25 1.78% · p50 5.12% · p75 11.0% · p90 20.4%
Position in cohort99.587th percentile · 11.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.049% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 14 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

60,67261,95161,311.56 August 2026 — 60,820 subscribers6 August 2026 — 60,815 subscribers7 August 2026 — 60,800 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60,788 subscribers9 August 2026 — 60,782 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,765 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,759 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,815 subscribers13 August 2026 — 60,794 subscribers15 August 2026 — 60,775 subscribers16 August 2026 — 60,822 subscribers17 August 2026 — 60,812 subscribers18 August 2026 — 60,803 subscribers19 August 2026 — 60,796 subscribers20 August 2026 — 60,788 subscribers22 August 2026 — 60,772 subscribers23 August 2026 — 60,744 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,721 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,696 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,672 subscribers28 August 2026 — 60,840 subscribers29 August 2026 — 61,095 subscribers29 August 2026 — 61,133 subscribers30 August 2026 — 61,141 subscribers31 August 2026 — 61,140 subscribers2 September 2026 — 61,123 subscribers3 September 2026 — 61,105 subscribers4 September 2026 — 61,092 subscribers8 September 2026 — 61,039 subscribers11 September 2026 — 61,052 subscribers12 September 2026 — 61,103 subscribers14 September 2026 — 61,078 subscribers16 September 2026 — 61,090 subscribers18 September 2026 — 61,067 subscribers2 October 2026 — 61,951 subscribers7 October 2026 — 61,884 subscribers11 October 2026 — 61,867 subscribers14 October 2026 — 61,856 subscribers15 October 2026 — 61,848 subscribers61,8486 August 202615 October 2026
39 measurements spanning 70 days, net +1,028. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,480–62,143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Oct 2026, 03:0161,848-8
14 Oct 2026, 01:3961,856-11
11 Oct 2026, 11:0161,867-17
7 Oct 2026, 05:4061,884-67
2 Oct 2026, 07:3661,951+884
18 Sept 2026, 13:5761,067-23
16 Sept 2026, 04:3661,090+12
14 Sept 2026, 11:5561,078-25
12 Sept 2026, 19:4161,103+51
11 Sept 2026, 00:1761,052+13
8 Sept 2026, 00:0061,039-53
4 Sept 2026, 23:1861,092-13
3 Sept 2026, 09:2961,105-18
2 Sept 2026, 02:1761,123-17
31 Aug 2026, 23:3761,140-1
30 Aug 2026, 21:4561,141+8
29 Aug 2026, 23:5761,133+38
29 Aug 2026, 02:5261,095+255
28 Aug 2026, 00:0460,840+168
26 Aug 2026, 22:1460,672first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.6%
avg views ÷ 61,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
35,600
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.933%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 October 2026
Posts held105 (27 July 2026 – 10 October 2026)
Views total1,211,300
Reactions total11,307
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Oct 2026, 19:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23m 20s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28,422 reactions across 105 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11,20139.4%
🤮7,41626.1%
😭1,3134.62%
🤣1,2714.47%
🥰1,1323.98%
🔥1,0893.83%
❤‍🔥8252.90%
😍6472.28%
👍6252.20%
👎3771.33%
💩3091.09%
🍌2820.992%
😐1840.647%
💘1820.64%
🤔1750.616%
💋1390.489%
🌭1130.398%
😱1130.398%
🙏1110.391%
🥱1080.38%
37 further kinds8102.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,422 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
198
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 105 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
115
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @notdim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 105 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 10 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Oct 2026, 20:41 UTC≈10,900 views301 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥164🤮93💋15❤12🤣4🍌3👎3💩3

10 Oct 2026, 20:41 UTC≈13,000 views115 reactionsread 14 October 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🤮57👍31🔥13❤6👎4🍌2💩2

10 Oct 2026, 20:41 UTC≈10,800 views331 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

[ZZZ - 2.6 REL] Severian Lowell Render Thanks to Chi for the render.

🔥189🤮84👎18❤13😐10💋8💩3🍌2

10 Oct 2026, 19:40 UTC≈42,700 views337 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤮183❤113👎12🌭9❤‍🔥6🤬5😭5😍2

10 Oct 2026, 19:39 UTC≈12,700 views137 reactionsread 14 October 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤50👎43🤮27🔥6🌭4🤬2😭2❤‍🔥1

10 Oct 2026, 19:39 UTC≈14,600 views370 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

[ZZZ - 3.3 BETA] Phoenix Skin #2 Render Thanks to Chi for the render.

🤮216🔥80❤37👎13🌭7😭5❤‍🔥4👍3

10 Oct 2026, 19:39 UTC≈13,500 views145 reactionsread 14 October 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🤮73❤50❤‍🔥6👎5😍3🌭2🤬2😭2

10 Oct 2026, 19:38 UTC≈14,800 views347 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

[ZZZ - 3.3 BETA] Phoenix Skin #1 Render Thanks to Chi for the render.

🤮212❤95👎14🌭7😍6🔥3😭3❤‍🔥2

9 Oct 2026, 11:58 UTC≈34,100 views215 reactionsread 14 October 2026

9.2 should be new Bronya as it's been teased officially already and a Fenghuang of Vicissitude skin, stc, etc.

❤147💩18👍13😱11🥰9🤡7🤮4🍌2

29 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC≈72,300 views323 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤234🥱57💩17🍌5💋3🔥2🤔2🤮2

29 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC≈60,400 views679 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

If not E6.

😭424🤣125🤮44❤31💩19🤡11💔10🔥5

29 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC≈60,100 views497 reactions1 Starread 14 October 2026
Video

This is E6 only, it seems.

🔥290🤮97😭27😱23💩18👎10❤8💋8

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @notdim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Honkai: Star Rail - Zeta
@hsrZeta · 20,270
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 28 September 2026
Wuthering Waves | WuWa News | WuWa Updates
@waves_wuthering · 29,818
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 September 2026
Reddit | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsrreddit · 32,353
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
Wuthering Waves | Новая увертюра
@wuthering_waves_lore · 19,356
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
Пом-Пом вещает | Honkai Star Rail
@honkai_star_rail_pompom · 25,710
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
Gokerja.id
@gokerjaid · 19,577
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 September 2026
Fact Honkai: Star Rail
@fact_honkaistarrail · 21,087
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 September 2026
Раскрываем потанцевал
@olezha_HSR · 30,976
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
Biology Spmnetic!™ 🔬
@biologyspmnotes · 32,476
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
Honkai Impact 3rd | iNFO
@honkai_impact_info · 20,148
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
HoYoverse | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsr_newss · 29,265
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
Genshin Impact [RC]
@GenshinRC · 217,873
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
Honkai: Star Rail RU
@honkaistarrailofficial · 231,774
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
Reddit | Genshin Impact
@redditgenshin · 29,784
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
Reddit | Zenless
@zenlessleak · 24,349
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Эй, Вадимчик | Genshin Impact
@hey_vadimchik · 19,555
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
Новости Катерины | Новости Геншин Импакт
@news_genshin · 24,369
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
Компаньон Паймон!
@paimon_impact · 27,868
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dim” (@notdim), 61,848 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notdim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.