28 measurements spanning 34 days, net +83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,737–12,865 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 23:39
12,839
+13
3 Sept 2026, 16:17
12,826
+2
2 Sept 2026, 08:43
12,824
-7
1 Sept 2026, 07:04
12,831
+1
31 Aug 2026, 04:55
12,830
-11
30 Aug 2026, 04:46
12,841
-2
29 Aug 2026, 02:04
12,843
-7
28 Aug 2026, 04:24
12,850
+10
27 Aug 2026, 07:25
12,840
-3
26 Aug 2026, 08:13
12,843
-6
25 Aug 2026, 08:14
12,849
+17
24 Aug 2026, 06:04
12,832
+13
22 Aug 2026, 12:46
12,819
+7
21 Aug 2026, 05:53
12,812
-2
19 Aug 2026, 12:05
12,814
+2
18 Aug 2026, 13:22
12,812
+5
17 Aug 2026, 16:16
12,807
+3
16 Aug 2026, 07:07
12,804
+4
14 Aug 2026, 19:07
12,800
+13
13 Aug 2026, 11:36
12,787
first reading
Engagement
180 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 12,839 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,760
153 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.895%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
153
of 180 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 132 of 153 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
180 (28 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
422,849
Reactions total
3,421
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 48s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,508 reactions across 155 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,392
30.9%
🤮
831
18.4%
💩
297
6.59%
🤣
276
6.12%
🔥
216
4.79%
😭
212
4.70%
🤨
150
3.33%
👎
118
2.62%
🥰
118
2.62%
🤔
104
2.31%
🤯
92
2.04%
👍
79
1.75%
🤡
79
1.75%
🕊
72
1.60%
🖕
59
1.31%
😁
59
1.31%
🥱
56
1.24%
😱
53
1.18%
👀
45
0.998%
🎉
36
0.799%
13 further kinds
164
3.64%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 158 of the 180 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,508 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 180 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 180 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @StarRailLeaks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 180 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Continuation
Pearl Ult Extra turn actually has weaker priority and works differently from other extra turns.
E.g. You can cast Yaoguang Ult after Queueing the Extra turn, and Yao's instant will go before the Extra turn does.
You can cast Ultimates during the extra turn (Very good for Eva and SW).
If you end the wave during this extra turn with an ability that doesn't end the turn, for example Eva's Ult or E2 SW's …
tbh elite enemies on moc 1 have 100k hp, while on moc 9 they have 200k....it's such a negligible difference to the point they could just remove the stages alltogether.
with current % as a new player 100k diff on a dps is like 1 trace and maybe 10 level diffs🕊
「HSR Joke」
最新一期忘却之庭里,米哈游直接将 1–4 层的敌人原样复制到 6–9 层,敌人生命值和等级完全没有改动(大家现在进游戏就能验证)。如此一来,前九层中第 5 层的敌人血量反而是最高的。这个明显的漏洞直到几天前才被发现。这是否说明《崩坏:星穹铁道》已经吸引不到新玩家了?
In the latest Memory of Chaos, HoYoverse copied the enemies from Floors 1–4 straight to Floors 6–9 without changing their HP or levels at all (you can verify this in‑game right now). As a result, Floor 5 has the highest HP values among the first nine floors. This glaring mi…
Actual V2 Change
Pearl Extra Turn Priority Reduced. Pearl Ult -> SW Ult for example will let you Enter her Ult State before the Extra Turn is forced. You still NEED enough Punchline to use SW Ult before Pearl Ult because Pearl's Ult Punchline is only given at the start of the Extra turn.
This means the Extra Turn has less priority than a standard FUA now (Should be the same priority as other extra turns as well).
…
不少人想要进一步说明。这里需要指出,从v1开始该数值就固定为 75%,从未改动。你看到的其他任何数值均为不实信息。
A few wanted further clarification. I should note that it has consistently been 75% starting from v1, with zero adjustments. Any other figures you may have come across are misinformation.
「HSR 4.6」
新 Boss 机制:血脑屏障。对所有非欢愉伤害获得 75% 减伤。网传的80或者85或者88或者90都是错的。
New boss mechanic: Blood‑Brain Barrier. 75% damage reduction against all non‑Elation damage. The rumored values of 80, 85, 88 and 90 are all incorrect.
[HSR] Character Kit
For the next little while any kits posted by us are being posted for preservation/record keeping purposes. Any notes will be attached to the characters as we deem necessary.
Kuchiba | Fire Elation
Note: This Character seems much more barebones compared to others, with no Elation Skill even being added yet
Basic
Deals Fire DMG equal to X% of Kuchiba's ATK to one designated enemy.
Skill
Deals F…
I don't have v2 yet, so i'm NOT 100% sure, but seems like Yabuli's shield went down from 65%->45% hp (idk what's the value the shield strenght is being calced onto), but the dmg reduction went up from 80% to 88%.. IN THEORY, this means the effective dmg your non elation team has to deal went up by +0.5 from 3.25x to 3.75x, but since her minions deal a fixed amount of dmg to her, and since the true dmg passes through …
✍17
Signed Dima
Showing the 12 most recent of 180 posts we hold for @StarRailLeaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sakura Haven @sakurahaven · 43,485 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 2 September 2026
HXG’s Channel @HXG_Channel · 54,918 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 2 September 2026
Fortnite ITALY 🇮🇹 @fortniteitalynews · 84,147 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 26 August 2026
MeroMero @merlin_impact · 42,827 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Honkai: Star Rail Italia - Leaks 🇮🇹” (@StarRailLeaks), 12,839 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StarRailLeaks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.