Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Honkai: Star Rail Italia - Leaks 🇮🇹

Channel

Honkai: Star Rail Italia - Leaks 🇮🇹

@StarRailLeaks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,839subscribers

+83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001201460836
TypeChannel
Username@StarRailLeaks
Created22 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/StarRailLeaks

Growth

12,75212,85012,8016 August 2026 — 12,756 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,756 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,752 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,759 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,756 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,764 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,768 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,773 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,787 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,800 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,804 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,807 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,812 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,814 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,812 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,819 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,832 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,849 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,843 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,840 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,850 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,843 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,841 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,830 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,831 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,824 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,826 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,839 subscribers12,8396 August 20268 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net +83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,737–12,865 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 23:3912,839+13
3 Sept 2026, 16:1712,826+2
2 Sept 2026, 08:4312,824-7
1 Sept 2026, 07:0412,831+1
31 Aug 2026, 04:5512,830-11
30 Aug 2026, 04:4612,841-2
29 Aug 2026, 02:0412,843-7
28 Aug 2026, 04:2412,850+10
27 Aug 2026, 07:2512,840-3
26 Aug 2026, 08:1312,843-6
25 Aug 2026, 08:1412,849+17
24 Aug 2026, 06:0412,832+13
22 Aug 2026, 12:4612,819+7
21 Aug 2026, 05:5312,812-2
19 Aug 2026, 12:0512,814+2
18 Aug 2026, 13:2212,812+5
17 Aug 2026, 16:1612,807+3
16 Aug 2026, 07:0712,804+4
14 Aug 2026, 19:0712,800+13
13 Aug 2026, 11:3612,787first reading

Engagement

180 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 12,839 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,760
153 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.895%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
153
of 180 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 132 of 153 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held180 (28 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total422,849
Reactions total3,421
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 48s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,508 reactions across 155 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,39230.9%
🤮83118.4%
💩2976.59%
🤣2766.12%
🔥2164.79%
😭2124.70%
🤨1503.33%
👎1182.62%
🥰1182.62%
🤔1042.31%
🤯922.04%
👍791.75%
🤡791.75%
🕊721.60%
🖕591.31%
😁591.31%
🥱561.24%
😱531.18%
👀450.998%
🎉360.799%
13 further kinds1643.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 158 of the 180 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,508 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 180 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 180 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @StarRailLeaks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 180 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,470 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Continuation Pearl Ult Extra turn actually has weaker priority and works differently from other extra turns. E.g. You can cast Yaoguang Ult after Queueing the Extra turn, and Yao's instant will go before the Extra turn does. You can cast Ultimates during the extra turn (Very good for Eva and SW). If you end the wave during this extra turn with an ability that doesn't end the turn, for example Eva's Ult or E2 SW's

Signed Dima

2 Sept 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,150 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026

tbh elite enemies on moc 1 have 100k hp, while on moc 9 they have 200k....it's such a negligible difference to the point they could just remove the stages alltogether. with current % as a new player 100k diff on a dps is like 1 trace and maybe 10 level diffs🕊

🕊171

Signed Dima

2 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈2,150 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026

they've done this some more times in the past as well apparently but no one cares enough about early moc to check

😭15🤣8💩2😁1

Signed Dima

2 Sept 2026, 12:59 UTC≈2,280 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

this is actually so funny😭

😭19🤣61

Signed Dima

2 Sept 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,650 views46 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Seele_Leaks

「HSR Joke」 最新一期忘却之庭里,米哈游直接将 1–4 层的敌人原样复制到 6–9 层,敌人生命值和等级完全没有改动(大家现在进游戏就能验证)。如此一来,前九层中第 5 层的敌人血量反而是最高的。这个明显的漏洞直到几天前才被发现。这是否说明《崩坏:星穹铁道》已经吸引不到新玩家了? In the latest Memory of Chaos, HoYoverse copied the enemies from Floors 1–4 straight to Floors 6–9 without changing their HP or levels at all (you can verify this in‑game right now). As a result, Floor 5 has the highest HP values among the first nine floors. This glaring mi

😭30🤣8👏4💩3😁1

Signed Dima

2 Sept 2026, 07:43 UTC≈2,900 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Actual V2 Change Pearl Extra Turn Priority Reduced. Pearl Ult -> SW Ult for example will let you Enter her Ult State before the Extra Turn is forced. You still NEED enough Punchline to use SW Ult before Pearl Ult because Pearl's Ult Punchline is only given at the start of the Extra turn. This means the Extra Turn has less priority than a standard FUA now (Should be the same priority as other extra turns as well).

17💩8😢2

Signed Dima

1 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC≈3,110 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

even more pet icons: SpaceZooIconExchange PetIconBoxChange PetIconPlus2 PetIconHome seems to be a decently big feature

4

Signed Dima

1 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈2,310 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Seele_Leaks

「HSR 4.6」 血脑屏障&真实伤害机制解析: 屏障会阻止追踪型真实伤害效果记录自身受到的伤害,但不会阻止真实伤害生效。 真实伤害机制需要预先储存伤害记录,之后再结算百分比伤害;直接击打屏障产生的伤害无法存入该记录。 昔涟与 RMC 的真实伤害对屏障完全无效。 特莉比以及斐恩 6 命的真实伤害会在普通敌人身上完成命中记录,并可能将效果转移至屏障,因此可以正常起效。 知更鸟・夏沫蕾托 1 命无法在屏障上登记伤害,但其真实伤害依旧能够生效。 Blood‑Brain Barrier & true damage breakdown: The barrier stops damage taken by itself from being logged by track‑based true‑damage effects, without blocking true damage application. Some true damag

10

Signed Dima

1 Sept 2026, 13:14 UTC≈2,070 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Seele_Leaks

不少人想要进一步说明。这里需要指出,从v1开始该数值就固定为 75%,从未改动。你看到的其他任何数值均为不实信息。 A few wanted further clarification. I should note that it has consistently been 75% starting from v1, with zero adjustments. Any other figures you may have come across are misinformation.

2

Signed Dima

1 Sept 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,870 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Seele_Leaks

「HSR 4.6」 新 Boss 机制:血脑屏障。对所有非欢愉伤害获得 75% 减伤。网传的80或者85或者88或者90都是错的。 New boss mechanic: Blood‑Brain Barrier. 75% damage reduction against all non‑Elation damage. The rumored values of 80, 85, 88 and 90 are all incorrect.

🤮244💩3

Signed Dima

1 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC≈2,180 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @sakurahaven

[HSR] Character Kit For the next little while any kits posted by us are being posted for preservation/record keeping purposes. Any notes will be attached to the characters as we deem necessary. Kuchiba | Fire Elation Note: This Character seems much more barebones compared to others, with no Elation Skill even being added yet Basic Deals Fire DMG equal to X% of Kuchiba's ATK to one designated enemy. Skill Deals F

🔥182💩1

Signed Dima

1 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC≈3,050 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026

I don't have v2 yet, so i'm NOT 100% sure, but seems like Yabuli's shield went down from 65%->45% hp (idk what's the value the shield strenght is being calced onto), but the dmg reduction went up from 80% to 88%.. IN THEORY, this means the effective dmg your non elation team has to deal went up by +0.5 from 3.25x to 3.75x, but since her minions deal a fixed amount of dmg to her, and since the true dmg passes through

17

Signed Dima

Showing the 12 most recent of 180 posts we hold for @StarRailLeaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Sakura Haven
@sakurahaven · 43,485
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 2 September 2026
HXG’s Channel
@HXG_Channel · 54,918
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 2 September 2026
Fortnite ITALY 🇮🇹
@fortniteitalynews · 84,147
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 26 August 2026
MeroMero
@merlin_impact · 42,827
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Honkai: Star Rail Italia - Leaks 🇮🇹” (@StarRailLeaks), 12,839 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StarRailLeaks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.