Channel
@storyverynice
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
815subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001245994103 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @storyverynice |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/storyverynice |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @storyverynice/2817 · this entry1 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC | @heammm8/6239271 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @storyverynice/2818 · this entry2 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC | @heammm8/6240012 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @heammm8 | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (17–0) |
| @qasas2 | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (14–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @storyverynice — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 815 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 821 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 826 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 821 | +16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 805 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 804 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 804 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 805 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
39 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 92.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.instagram.com/rabttabaladbyt?igsh=bDhrbDBwYjl3N21q فضلًا، تابعوا وشاركوا الحساب الرسمي لـ رابطة إب الأدبية على منصة إنستغرام؛ المساحة التي تحتضن أدباء محافظة إب، وتواكب إبداعاتهم، وتنقل أنشطتهم ومنجزاتهم الأدبية والثقافية. دعمكم ومتابعتكم امتدادٌ للكلمة، وإسهامٌ في وصولها إلى فضاءٍ أوسع.
Signed زايد الشامي
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Signed زايد الشامي
القوى الخفية. سلسلة نضال الجزء الثاني. الحلقة الرابعة عشر . " ما الذي صَنَعَتْهُ الماسونية بالشباب؟! " لم أكن أتوقع أنَّ العربَ بهذا الغباء! (قالها عبد الحميد وهو مستلقٍ على سريره). كان نضال جالسًا على مكتبته يقرأ كتابًا يتحدث عن النوادي الماسونية، بينما باغت كلام عبد الحميد مسامعه، فتفاجأ من هذا الكلام! - نضال: ما الذي حدث حتى تكلَّمت بهذا الكلام؟! -منذ أيام وأنا أفكَّر، ما هذا الغباء الذي يسيطر على العرب؟!…
❤1
Signed زايد الشامي
ما أشد وقع جراحك عليّ، وما أخف وقع جراحي عليك. زايد الشامي.
❤4
Signed زايد الشامي
القوى الخفية. سلسلة نضال الجزء الثاني. الحلقة الثالثة عشر. " الماسونية تستهدف الحجاب " بعد مرور ثلاثة أيام من الموقف الذي حدث بين نضال وإليزابيث، اتصل نضالٌ بوالده في مصر، وتكلَّم معه، فكان والده متفاجئًا جدًا من طباع الناس وعاداتهم في مصر، فأخبر نضال عن مصر، وعن العادات والتقاليد المصرية. - نضال لوالده: ليست مصر يا أبي فحسب، بل معظم البلاد العربية أصبحت بهذه الطباع. هل أستطيع أن أكلَّم عمتي رقية الآن يا أبي…
Signed زايد الشامي
القوى الخفية. سلسلة نضال الجزء الثاني. الحلقة الثانية عشر. "اللهَ اللهَ في مشاعر الناس" في اليوم الثاني جلس نضال مع عبد الحميد، كان نضال حائرًا بعض الشيء، لاحظ ذلك عبد الحميد، فقال: - مررتُ بالأمس بجانبك أنت وإليزابيث، فتعجبتُ كثيرًا من ارتداء إليزابيث للملابس الطويلة، وقيامها بتغطية رأسها بشيءٍ كالحجاب، ما الأمر يا صديقي؟! هل أنت من أقنعتها بارتداء هذه الملابس؟ - كلا، لم أتكلم معها ولم أقنعها أبدًا بارتداء م…
❤1
Signed زايد الشامي
القوى الخفية سلسلة نضال الجزء الثاني الحلقة الحادي عشر. " دار العجزة والمسنين " لم ينسَ نضال موعده مع إليزابيث، فقد ذهب اليوم الثاني للمكان المعروف وفي التوقيت المحدد.. انتظر قليلاً حتى جاءت إليزابيث. - مرحبًا، لقد سبقتني هذه المرة. - أهلًا بك، تفضلي، يمكنكِ الجلوس. - شكرًا، لم نكمل حديثنا بالأمس، أين وصلنا؟ لقد ذكرتَ لي بعض الأشياء التي تحث الإنسان على البر بوالديه من كتابكم المقدس (القرآن). - هذا صحيح، هناك آيات…
❤1
Signed زايد الشامي
- كيف يزيِّفون تاريخهم؟! لم أفهم. -لا بد أن أكثرنا يعرف العالم الفيزيائي الكبير (إسحق نيوتن). في الحقيقة أن هذا العالم كان موحدًا يؤمن بوجود الله ( ). - ما الذي تقوله؟ نيوتن كان موحدًا! - نعم، ولكن غزاة التاريخ صوَّروا لنا نيوتن أنه كان ملحِدًا لا يؤمن بوجود إله، وأيضًا هناك عالم كيميائي آخر كان موحدًا، وعلى دين الأريسيين، ويكفر بألوهية الثالوث، هذا العالم هو (جوزيف بريستلي) الذي اكتشف الأكسجين بعد عزله من حالته الغا…
👍2❤1
Signed زايد الشامي
القوى الخفية سلسلة نضال الجزء الثاني. الحلقة العاشرة. " الحضارة الطبِّيَة وعلماء الإسلام " بعد أن عاد نضال إلى السكن حاول الاتصال بأبيه ولكن دون جدوى، فهاتف والدهِ خارج التغطية. فقال (في نفسه مازحًا): هل يريد أبي أن يفعل بي كما فعلتُ به؟ ولكني لم أكن أعلم بأنه سيتصل، فعادةً ما أكون أنا المتصل، سأُكرِّر الاتصال حتى يفتح هاتفه، لأكون أنا المتصل له. مرَّت ثلاث ساعات وهو مازال يحاول الاتصال بأبيه، فجاء عبد الحميد…
❤1
Signed زايد الشامي
File, posted without a caption
Signed زايد الشامي
القوى الخفية سلسلة نضال الجزء الثاني الحلقة التاسعة " البـــر بالوالديــن " بعد مرور ساعة من لقاء نضال وإليزابيث وما دار بينهما من حوار، قال نضال: - ما الموضوع الذي تريدين أن نتناقش فِيه؟ - نريد التحدث عن أمر الوالدين، كيف هي وجهة نظر مجتمعكم إليهما؟ وكيف تكون معاملتكم لهما؟ -الوالدان! لا أعرف كيف أبدأ لكِ النقاش في هذا الموضوع، ولكن أقول: فضلُ الوالدين ومكانتهما أمرٌ عظيمٌ، وأخاف إن تكلمت عنهما ألا أفيهما …
❤1
Signed زايد الشامي
القوى الخفية سلسلة نضال الجزء الثاني الحلقة الثامنة "عــــادات وتقــاليــد" في اليوم التالي نهض نضال باكرًا؛ كي يذهب لملاقاة إليزابيث.. كالعادة وصل في الوقت المحدد، والمكان المعروف، محل قهوة لندن المزدحم بالناس؛ حتى لا يجلس معها بمفردهما. - إليزابيث: مرحبًا نضال، تفضل. - أهلاً بك، شكرًا جزيلاً. - هل تعرف يا نضال لقد أحببتُ قصصك الممتعة، والحقائق التي تكشفها لي عن نساء وفتيات العرب، وقد ازددتُ تعلقًا وشغفًا إل…
❤2
Signed زايد الشامي
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @storyverynice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جيل سنوار .” (@storyverynice), 815 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/storyverynice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.