Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الغرباء

Channel

الغرباء

@strangersaemn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,605subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001757634522
TypeChannel
Username@strangersaemn
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/strangersaemn

Growth

7,5517,6137,5827 August 2026 — 7,551 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,557 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,580 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,605 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,602 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,613 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,612 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,607 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,610 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,606 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,603 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,605 subscribers7,6057 August 202610 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,542–7,622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 06:167,605+2
5 Sept 2026, 08:207,603-3
1 Sept 2026, 12:577,606-4
29 Aug 2026, 10:587,610+3
26 Aug 2026, 15:587,607-5
24 Aug 2026, 00:567,612-1
20 Aug 2026, 09:427,613+11
17 Aug 2026, 13:257,602-3
14 Aug 2026, 07:377,605+25
10 Aug 2026, 22:087,580+23
8 Aug 2026, 02:327,557+6
7 Aug 2026, 09:157,551first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 7,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
803
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.596%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held67 (1 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total29,706
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

202 reactions across 33 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12059.4%
👍3617.8%
❤‍🔥199.41%
😢146.93%
💔83.96%
🕊52.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC148 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @manasst_bunyan

https://meet.google.com/eme-sxoq-cpk حياكم الله نبدأ بعد قليل مع الشيخ حفظه الله

Signed عبدالرحمن الحَسَنِي

25 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC571 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @g_0kc900File

File, posted without a caption

Signed أبو أنس

25 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC577 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @shedwanaboalhasan

جزى الله الأخ الحبيب الشيخ علي سويدان المشهداني خيرا على هذا الجهد الذي أسأل الله أن يجعله حجة لنا عنده سبحانه.

Signed أبو أنس

24 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC220 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026

بث المجلس الاول في التعليق على كتاب الاخلاص والنية لابن أبي الدنيا

❤‍🔥2

Signed أبو أنس

24 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC221 viewsread 25 August 2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Dh8zd6gAJ/

Signed أبو أنس

24 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC770 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

عن ابن طاوس، عن أبيه، قال: "من السنة أن يوقر، أربعة: العالم،وذو الشيبة، والسلطان، والوالد". [الفقيه والمتفقه للخطيب البغدادي ٢/ ٣٨٠].

2👍2

Signed أبو أنس

23 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC765 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

قال الحافظ ابن رجب رحمه الله: "فالأيام خزائن للناس ممتلئة بما خزنوه فيها من خير وشر، وفي يوم القيامة تفتح هذه الخزائن لأهلها؛ فالمتقون يجدون في خزائنهم العز والكرامة، والمذنبون يجدون في خزائنهم الحسرة والندامة" لطائف المعارف ص١٩٦.

5👍1

Signed أبو أنس

23 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC825 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026

بازٌ عُثَيْمِينٌ وناصرُ سُنَّةٍ إيمانُهم أمنٌ، أمانٌ يُؤملُ

👍6❤‍🔥21

Signed أبو أنس

23 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC882 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

قال مالك بن دينار: "إن العبد إذا طلب العلم للعمل كسره علمه، وإذا طلبه لغير ذلك ازداد به فجوراً أو فخراً". [رواه الخطيب في اقتضاء العلم العمل(٣١)]. قال الذهبي-رحمه الله-(ت: ٧٤٨ ه): "إِن من طلب العلم للآخرة كَسره علمه، وخشع قلبه، واستكانت نفسه، وكان على نفسه بالمرصاد، فلا يفتر عنه! بل يحاسبها كل وقت، ويتفقدها فَإِن غفل عنها جمحت عن الطَّريق المُستقيم وأهلكته". [الكبائر، ص٧٨].

😢32💔1

Signed أبو أنس

23 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC789 viewsread 28 August 2026

نشرت طبقة مجالس البارحة 👆🏻

Signed أبو أنس

23 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjzzdpLNMCcFEOd_RCpsKRzw5-22-C96w&si=A1H7KWvSZxFrh1ro قائمة تشغيل 👆🏻 تم بحمد الله نشر جميع صوتيات شرح شيخنا الفاضل أبو المنار العلمي حفظه الله على كتابه: القول المبارك في رسالة الليث إلى الامام مالك.

Signed أبو أنس

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @strangersaemn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دريد ابراهيم الموصلي
@kotobduraid · 46,545
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
قناة الجهني العلمية
@khaledalgohany · 33,058
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
قناة الشيخ وحيد بالي
@wahidbaly · 32,080
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
فوائد علمية للشيخ د. عبد المحسن القاسم
@FawaidAlQasim · 76,576
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
مُسليات اليحيى
@moslyati_yhya · 36,724
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
إذاعة طلاب العلم الشرعي
@Ida3t_taleb_al3elme · 53,855
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
أكاديمية الفرقان للثقافة الإسلامية
@forqanacademy · 73,040
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
أكاديمية البلدة الطيبة العلمية
@BALDATAYIBA · 58,881
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
معهد العلامة ابن عثيمين وطلابه - القناة العامة
@Uthaimeen_Institute · 42,020
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الغرباء” (@strangersaemn), 7,605 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strangersaemn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.