_ اللهمّ صلّ وسلّم وبارك علىٰ سيدِنا محمدٍ ﷺ وعلىٰ آلِه وصحبِه ومَن تبعَهم بإحسانٍ إلىٰ يومِ الدين.. آمين.!

Channel
رَوْضَةُ أَهْلِ الْحَدِيثِ
@moltqaahlalhadith
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,818subscribers
-909 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001390820419 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moltqaahlalhadith |
| Description | "خَلَتْ الدّيارُ فَسُدتُ غَيْرَ مُسَوَّدِ وَمِن الشّقاءِ تفَرُّدِي بالسّؤدَدِ " رَحمَ اللهُ شيخَنا أبَا إسْحاقَ الحُوينيَّ. _ الإنشاءُ: (١٣رجب١٤٤٢ هـ) (٢٠٢١/٢/٢٥م) |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moltqaahlalhadith |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:56 | 25,818 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:17 | 25,827 | -11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:06 | 25,838 | -31 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:27 | 25,869 | -39 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:29 | 25,908 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:45 | 25,912 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 25,910 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:35 | 25,906 | +12 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 25,894 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:29 | 25,901 | -17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:20 | 25,918 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 25,925 | -22 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 25,947 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 25,960 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 25,968 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 25,981 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 25,987 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 25,997 | -5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 26,002 | -11 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 26,013 | first reading |
Engagement
507 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 138 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.00%
- avg views ÷ 25,818 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 774
- 160 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 161
- of 507 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 507 (13 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 123,827 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 23:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,260
- Videos
- ≈852
- Links
- ≈5,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 30m
- Average length
- 2m 49s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 20 of 161 posts held from the last 30 days (12.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
_ كان ﷺ يقولُ عن أمِّ المؤمنين خديجةَ-رضي الله عنها-.: (إني قد رزقتُ حبَّها) رواه مسلم .
رَوْضَةُ أَهْلِ الْحَدِيثِ pinned «📍نصيحةٌ: لا تفوتكم مجالسُ القناة ياكِرام وإن لم تستطع الحضور عبر البث المباشر فارجع للتسجيلات ماشاءَ الله لا قوة إلا بالله أسأل اللهَ تبارك وتعالى أن يحفظ لنا مشايخَنا بهذه القناةِ التي أسأل اللهَ أن يجعلها مباركةً ويتقبّلها منّا بقبول حسَن.. لا يخلو مجلس…»
📍نصيحةٌ: لا تفوتكم مجالسُ القناة ياكِرام وإن لم تستطع الحضور عبر البث المباشر فارجع للتسجيلات ماشاءَ الله لا قوة إلا بالله أسأل اللهَ تبارك وتعالى أن يحفظ لنا مشايخَنا بهذه القناةِ التي أسأل اللهَ أن يجعلها مباركةً ويتقبّلها منّا بقبول حسَن.. لا يخلو مجلس من فوائد حديثيّة وفقهيّة أو حتى لغويّة وهدفنا الأول والأساسي "الدّراية والعلم" لا مجرد الرواية والإجازات .. المشايخ جميعهم تبارك الله ربّ العالمين أسأل اللهَ ﷻ…
_ #تذكير: مجلس الفقه سيكون على المجموعة التفاعلية- إن شاءَ الله تعالى-، والتذكير سوف يُنشر هناك كذلك فالمهتم ينضم للمجموعة: https://t.me/+8qHZzOirZBgyYjNk
فكيفَ تأمن أنتَ، وأنتَ أنتَ !!
_ روى البخاريُّ ومسلمُ مِن حديثِ عبدالله بنِ عمر أن النبي ﷺ قال: «إنَّ مِنَ الشَّجَرِ لَمَا بَرَكَتُهُ كَبَرَكَةِ المُسْلِمِ» • [ المسلمُ المتمسك بإسلامِه، العامل بشرائِعه وأحكامِه مباركٌ أينما حل، وكل ما كان إسلامُه أتمّ كانت بركتُه أعظمُ وأنفع !]
Photo, posted without a caption
أحاديث معلة ظاهرها الصحة الشيخ مقبل بن هادي الوادعي #كتب_الشيخ_مقبل_الوادعي
#همسة_بلهجة_مصرية : _ سمعت الشيخ: أمجد سمير يقول: «الناس كلها في الدنيا بتدوّر على حاجتين: "مال وبنون" بس سيدنا إبراهيم قال: ولا تخزني يوم يبعثون يوم لا ينفع مال ولا بنون، إلا مَن أتىٰ الله بقلب سليم، يبقى مين هو الفايز يوم القيامة؟ صاحب القلب السليم.. فابذل مجهود في إصلاح قلبك مِن الخبث والظلم والشهوة والرياء والحسد والحقد والشرك، والمكر، عشان تنجو يوم القيامة.»!
_ قال ابنُ الجوزيّ- رحمَه الله- : "لما عرفتُ شرف النكاح، وفضل الأولاد، ختمت ختمة، وسألت الله تعالى أن يرزقني عشرة أولاد، فرزقنيهم، فكانوا: خمسة ذكور، وخمس إناث"!! {صيدُ الخاطر(ص٤٩٩)} ◾️
_ ولنَا في القرآن حياة! ♡ ◾️
Showing the 12 most recent of 507 posts we hold for @moltqaahlalhadith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@moltqaahlalhadith edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 18 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 37 posts on @moltqaahlalhadith as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 18 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 19
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@aletqan23 · 22212 postsسَبِيْلُ الإٍعرَاب
@AriseAndWarn · 6,3492 postsشبكة مشكاة الإسلامية
@almeshkat_net · 17,0552 postsكتب أهل الحديث والمحدِّثين 📚
@Jalbani · 19,8791 post- هدايات الحُفَّاظ ...
@hdaaayat · 31,6111 postروْضَةُ أهْلِ العِلمِ
@jsdbgdj · 7011 postقناة عبد الله الطويل: منظومات وفوائد
@nazim_eltaaweel · 1,3211 postمُذَكِّر
@zain050 · 9,8271 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@RuHuLLBeYaN · 8,163#1
@mjalis_mohdsadiqkhan · 12,782#2
@ahl_alhadith_walathar · 8,496#3
@tuue5ue458igr · 4,160#4
@rawasekh1 · 5,289#5
@ImamBukhariCentre · 14,656#6
@tahelhadethe · 20,430#7
@Ejazah_mjalismsadiqkhan · 7,863#8
@asaaneed · 6,559#9
@YamanKhalilAlMuflehAlDoumi · 7,143#10
@Madrasat_Alhadith_Almisria · 6,214#11
@ibnadbar · 2,825#12
@Ethafalkhalaf · 4,204#13
@strangersaemn · 7,606#14
@AshameaSchool · 5,354#15
@daralkadiriya · 4,101#16
@SunahALHbib · 6,606#17
@omarabdelaziz4 · 6,130#18
@estelahhadeth · 5,978#19
@Almajeedye · 10,579#20
@Rawdetahlalhadeeth · 3,050#21
@magalesnaaltayeba · 5,498#22
@dar_shikhalislam · 5,409#23
@Shekh_Abdulrahman · 3,186#24
@Dr_Maher_Alfahl · 15,888#25
@S9nnah · 4,978#26
@nibrasel3ilm · 1,108#27
@darolhadeeth · 1,952#28
@alazharskul · 2,516#29
@dar_hadith_atharia · 2,148#30
@tahelhadethemubtadi · 8,103#31
@almaktaba7adeeth · 7,515#32
@madrasattssselllhadethwaolomea · 3,947#33
@hagrAAH · 3,017#34
@takhreg · 6,720#35
@Jalbani · 19,879#36
@Alimam_Al_Dhahabi_School · 3,035#37
@la6aef1 · 7,615#38
@allalhdeth · 4,187#39
@taasisousoli · 13,377#40
@lmam_Bukharischool · 6,334#41
@alhadithalf · 2,057#42
@daewa2021 · 5,581#43
@salaf1445 · 2,577#44
@mecalis · 1,346#45
@athar135 · 1,407#46
@almajem · 7,824#47
@AHL7DETH · 5,315#48
@mergebooks · 31,394#49
@Drakramnemrawi · 5,752#50
@ijazat_m7ather · 2,013#51
@alrubania · 3,920#52
@AlnabilAlsobky · 1,580#53
@algrabb · 1,306#54
@drmohamadismail21 · 927#55
@faqeh77 · 20,879#56
@azharhades · 5,091#57
@DrAlanees · 4,032#58
@Qarafi_School · 7,694#59
@hayatelgolob · 1,442#60
@ketab1437 · 2,449#61
@dr_nabilbelhi21 · 23,020#62
@dar_baghdadea · 2,112#63
@elsarmani_official · 1,406#64
@aaltalabanty · 22,173#65
@sssamm4 · 1,286#66
@alasned · 2,184#67
@basata25 · 2,949#68
@hassan12zkjs · 2,258#69
@academy_eqraa · 16,638#70
@salaftime · 31,777#71
@mashyakhaba · 2,987#72
@FawaidAlQasim · 79,920#73
@Alhanabla · 12,116#74
@ibrahim_almdehesh · 23,067#75
@DrAboSalahM · 12,979#76
@dzhadith · 703#77
@Iraqi_Hadith_school · 5,153#78
@multaka_alisnad · 2,961#79
@Algoayme · 45,957#80
@madrasataltaasil1445 · 862#81
@elkifaya_fi_erriwaya · 1,421#82
@HADETHE_NET · 2,872#83
@Al_eilm · 18,379#84
@mjalis_books_msadiqkhan · 3,303#85
@algoharyahmad · 39,131#86
@koutobi · 75,957#87
@Meeraath1443 · 13,426#88
@ahlullhadith · 6,067#89
@tibaqat_mjalissadiqkhan · 1,287#90
@mjals7 · 4,343#91
@AZ09ZAGH90 · 1,174#92
@alsuhaji · 1,640#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@alazhryahmedali12445 · 49,431
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@tahelhadethe · 20,430
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
@algohany10101 · 24,273
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
@isaonlinenet · 39,864
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
@arabicpdfs1 · 59,661
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
@khaledalgohany · 32,879
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
@wahidbaly · 32,645
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
@kotobduraid · 47,652
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
@Quran_j · 163,296
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@nawsany · 83,238
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026
@xcvbnggjkkkkkqwer · 146,168
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026
@fastabi9oual5ayrat · 129,740
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 13 August 2026
@CoursesIslam · 54,911
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
@Alqari_alsaghir · 21,113
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
@dr_nabilbelhi21 · 23,020
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 September 2026
@BALDATAYIBA · 57,772
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
@annahoalmuyser · 38,138
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رَوْضَةُ أَهْلِ الْحَدِيثِ” (@moltqaahlalhadith), 25,818 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moltqaahlalhadith.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.