Channel
@strategyclose
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,653subscribers
+5,699 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001965352562 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @strategyclose |
| Description | 🔴سیستمی که ۶ ساله درآمد میسازه را آموزش میدم،این سیستم چند صد میلیون تومن درآمد داشته. حتی با نت ملی هم کار میکنه ❌👨🏻💻 برای شرکت در کلاس رایگان از طریق لینک زیر ثبت نام کنید 👇 https://api.ac.sinazre.ir/r/mr14t پشتیبانی👇 @Forexwithsina |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/strategyclose |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @sinatrade1/27645 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC | @strategyclose/19622 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @sinatrade1/27655 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC | @strategyclose/19623 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @strategyclose/19624 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC | @sinatrade1/27665 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @strategyclose/19625 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC | @sinatrade1/27675 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @strategyclose/19629 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC | @sinatrade1/27716 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @strategyclose/19631 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC | @sinatrade1/27736 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @sinatrade1 | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (11–4) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @sinatrade1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 29,653 | -81 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 29,734 | -79 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 29,813 | -66 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:45 | 29,879 | -60 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 29,939 | -73 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 30,012 | -78 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 30,090 | -59 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 30,149 | -58 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 30,207 | -279 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 30,486 | -68 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 15:40 | 30,554 | -39 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 30,593 | -607 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 31,200 | -205 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 31,405 | -151 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 31,556 | -237 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 31,793 | -309 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 32,102 | -449 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 32,551 | +525 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 32,026 | +944 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 31,082 | first reading |
515 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 103 of 167 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 515 (5 August 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 106,995 |
| Reactions total | 340 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 05:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,237 reactions across 350 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,827 | 87.3% | |
| 👍 | 159 | 4.91% | |
| 👏 | 95 | 2.93% | |
| 🔥 | 59 | 1.82% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 0.711% | |
| 👀 | 15 | 0.463% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 0.432% | |
| 👾 | 10 | 0.309% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 0.278% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 0.247% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 0.124% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.124% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.093% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.093% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.062% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.031% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.031% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 360 of the 515 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 515 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
داخل این جلسه وبینار چه اتفاقی میوفته ⁉️⁉️ یک هفته زمان گذاشتم تا وبیناری طراحی کنم که یه فرد ۱۶ تا ۶۰ ساله رو بتونه توی یک هفته به درآمد دلاری برسونه ✅ یه بخشی از مطالب وبینار را داخل ویس گفتم با دقت گوش بدید ⚠️👆 ویس یک 📍
روزتون بخیر 🌞☀️ امروز راس ساعت ۱۲:۰۰ جلسه ی اول وبینار” آموزش درآمددلاری از ترید” هستش 🔥🔥 اگه تا الان ثبت نام نکردید همین الان بزنید روی لینک زیر و تا فرصت هست ثبت نامتونو انجام بدید⬇️‼️ بریم بهتون بگم قراره چه چیزهایی از جلسه ی امروز یاد بگیرید💎
سود یک روزشون بیشتر از ۱ ماه اداره کار هست این نتایج رو ببینید رفقا سود پشت سود😍🔥 تمامی این سود ها و درآمد فقط با یک گوشی و کمتر از روزانه۱_۲ ساعت زمان بدست اومده✅ با کدوم شغل و سیستم دیگه ای میتونی اینطوری پول در بیاری ⁉️
فرمولی که من داشتم برام درآمد دلاری میساخت ❗️ به همین خاطر به هر چی میخواستم سریع میرسیدم 🌱 آخه ایران اینجوریه، ریال مثل یخ میمونه هر روز کوچیکتر میشه 🟥 و برعکسش دلار هر روز بزرگتر میشه 🟩😉
❤1
من نه سرمایه داشتم نه استعداد خاصی داشتم نه چیزی بیشتر از شما داشتم ❌❌ من دقیقاً مثل خود شما هستم ❗️ توی ایران با همین تورم سرسام آور دارم زندگی میکنم ولی یه فرمولی دارم که توی ایران جواب میده و پول زیادی میسازه 💪⚠️
❤3
من از یه انباری بدون سرمایه اولیه بدون پشتوانه مالی بدون اینکه پدر پولداری داشته باشم رسیدم به هر چیزی که میخوام 🙌❤️ و همه اینارو از یه فرمول بدست آوردم
📌اگر حتی فقط یکی از این سؤالها تو ذهنت هست، وبینار امروز برای توعه ✅👇 - از کجا و چطور درآمد دلاری را شروع کنم ؟ - چه راه هایی برای رسیدن به درآمد دلاری وجود داره ؟ - کدوم مسیر راحت تر و سریعتر به درآمد میرسه ؟ - کدوم مسیر سرمایه کمتری میخواد؟ - کدوم مسیر درآمد بیشتری داره ؟ برای پیدا کردن جواب این سوال ها فقط کافیه امروز راس ساعت ۱۲ توی وبینار شرکت کنی✅📲
اینجوری بهتون یاد میدم چطور از ایران به درآمد دلاری بالا برسید🇮🇷💸 راس ساعت ۱۲:۰۰ تو جلسه میبینمتون💎✨
یکی از راه هایی که تو وبینار امروز میخوام بهتون آموزش بدم اینجوری بهتون سود روزانه میده🔥⬆️ فقط هم با روزی ۲،۳ ساعت زمان گذاشتن و با یک گوشی موبایل📲 راس ساعت ۱۲:۰۰ حضور داشته باشید چون جلسه آنلاین برگذار میشه و ضبط نمیشه تکرار هم نداره❌
🔴 چطوری توی همین شرایط پول دربیاریم؟! چطوری توی ایران میشه به درآمد زیاد رسید ؟! داخل جلسه اول وبینار چه اتفاقی میوفته⁉️⁉️ داخل وبینار ساعت 12 چی گفتم که اینقدر دارم روش تاکید میکنم❤️ ویس یک 📍
❤3
ببینین خود من از کجا شروع کردم و به کجا رسیدم👆✨ نه خانواده ی پولدار داشتم نه ابزار و امکانات 🤷🏻♂️ولی الان ماهی +۲۰۰۰ دلار درآمد دارم امروز تو وبینار بهتون راهی که این درآمد رو هر ماه مستمر دارم هم بهتون نشون میدم کیف کنید💎😎 اگه هنوز تو وبینار ثبت نام نکردید بزنید رو لینک زیر تا فرصت هست👇🏼
❤4
روزتون بخیر☀️⛅️ امروز راس ساعت ۱۲:۰۰ وبینار آموزشی “ ۵ راه درآمد دلاری در ایران” شروع میشه🔥🔥 بهتون میگم دقیقا قراره چه اتفاقی تو آموزش امروز بیوفته دقت کنید♥️👇🏼
Showing the 12 most recent of 515 posts we hold for @strategyclose. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@strategyclose edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
همه نظرسنجی شرکت کنید رفقا ⁉️
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 515 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“درآمددلاری |سیستمSTZ✌️🚀” (@strategyclose), 29,653 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strategyclose.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.