فکر نمیکنم فعلا جنگ بزرگی در کار باشه🟠🔴 اما حتما تو اوربیت ترید کنید👍🌟 ➡امنیت بالا ➡کارمزد کم ➡پشتیبانی فارسی و قوی https://www.ourbit.com/register?inviteCode=YJJJRD

Channel
کریپتو با امیرسام | CBA
@amirsambtc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
110,983subscribers
-12,471 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001772755231 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amirsambtc |
| Description | امیرسام | CBA 📈📊 🗓 فعالیت از April 2019 تیم بزرگ امیرسام اینجاست تا شما رو از هرگونه ضرر، به دور نگه داره😉🤟 تمام خدمات این کانال در راستای حمایت از هموطنان عزیز، رایگان هست 🇮🇷 عضویت رایگان CIP 👇 @amirsam_btc |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amirsambtc |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 110,983 | +4,863 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 106,120 | -4,931 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 111,051 | +5,090 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 105,961 | -5,673 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 111,634 | -7,882 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 119,516 | -4,670 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 124,186 | +3,504 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 120,682 | -165 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:12 | 120,847 | -1,769 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:35 | 122,616 | +8,371 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 114,245 | -869 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 115,114 | -2,063 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 117,177 | -1,492 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 118,669 | +2,754 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 115,915 | +1,300 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 114,615 | -1,209 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 115,824 | -1,362 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 117,186 | +8,355 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 108,831 | -2,933 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 111,764 | first reading |
Engagement
534 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.35%
- avg views ÷ 110,983 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,050
- 283 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 283
- of 534 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 534 (5 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,994,397 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 02:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,290
- Videos
- ≈45
- Links
- ≈332
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 28s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🌟میدونی تو جنگ قبلی اوربیت با تلاش های خودش ی کاری کرد که بتونی با نت ملی هم ترید کنی 💪الان هم اگر دغدغه اینه، حتما تو اوربیت حساب باز کن تا به راحتی و با هر اینترنتی بتونی فعالی کنی https://www.ourbit.com/register?inviteCode=YJJJRD
این دعا ها برام خیلی شیرین تر از پوله💎 تو هم میتونی رایگان عضو کانال سیگنال من بشی ✅ فقط بنویس 🔠🔠🔠 @amirsam_btc
#AVAX تو هفته اخیر پامپ ۱۰۰ درصدی داشته مقاومت فعلی روی ۱۱.۵ دلار هست ✅ @amirsambtc
حتما جوین بدین ، شانستونو امتحان کنین شاید برنده 200$ تو باشی ❤️🔥
به سه نفر اولی که جوین چنل زیر بشه 200$ هدیه گذاشتیم 💸 زود جوین شو وا شانس خودتو امتحان کن ❤️ 📌https://t.me/+M7AW6UA5hVY2MjY0
#CHZ از سقف کانال صعودی عبور کرده و پامپ شده فعلا برای خرید ریسکی هست ✅ @amirsambtc
#JASMY الگوی سر و شانه معکوس دیده میشه میتونه همچین روندی داشته باشه ✅ @amirsambtc
#OP رو ۱۴ سنت مقاومت سنگینی داره احتمال اصلاح هست ✅ @amirsambtc
#LTC ارز خوبی هست برای خرید میان مدتی بررسی کنید ✅ @amirsambtc
#TOTAL2 شاخص آلت کوین ها در تایم فریم هفتگی به مقاومت رسیده اما همچنان در میان مدتی صعودی به نظر میرسه ✅ @amirsambtc
⚠️احتمال درگیری و جنگ بالارفته و اگه جنگ بشه احتمال قطعی اینترنت وجود داره! 📶اما توی قطعی اینترنت چجوری ترید کنیم⁉️ 🟢 پیشنهاد من صرافی OURBIT که میتونی با نت ملی و بدون نیاز به فیلترشکن باهاش ترید کنی. 🌟 با لینک ما ثبت نام کنید تا کارمزد پایینتری پرداخت کنی، تا هر موردی داشتی برات پیگیری کنیم. https://www.ourbit.com/register?inviteCode=YJJJRD
Showing the 12 most recent of 534 posts we hold for @amirsambtc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@amirsambtc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 6 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC · 83,397#1
@GOLDVSBTC1 · 44,133#2
@CryptoMarket_BitBoy · 22,570#3
@Caspian_Crypto · 84,695#4
@Cryptoo_neews · 21,342#5
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 106,677#6
@Signal_Alpha · 167,505#7
@Cryptofa_official · 44,962#8
@crypto_shekar · 14,408#9
@mahdiazimi_classic_patterns · 84,939#10
@traderpasha · 102,110#11
@farhad1356 · 79,336#12
@Radcryptosignal · 95,494#13
@TROON · 1,617,080#14
@AmirCrypttoo · 11,469#15
@YKCRYPTOchanle · 21,207#16
@signallbinance · 13,673#17
@irmemecoin · 19,153#18
@bitfa · 223,347#19
@crypto_ssignal · 22,224#20
@ucn_ir · 161,108#21
@vipbaz_signal · 19,450#22
@mrsignal · 181,569#23
@khancryptoir · 220,481#24
@Nobitexmag · 148,847#25
@tatcoinn · 43,808#26
@SirBitMiner · 772,771#27
@cryptoplusers · 461,457#28
@lordcryptovip · 809,725#29
@nobitexmarket · 319,385#30
@Crypto_Azarmi · 54,516#31
@signalraigancripto · 2,666 (as read 13 August 2026)#32
@crypto_signall_vvip · 13,618#33
@analysis_altcoins · 34,585#34
@Tech_Killa · 5,518#35
@arz_jo · 16,414#36
@analysis_bitcoin · 31,255#37
@bsignal · 441,806#38
@tvtsignal · 4,191#39
@RstCrypto · 393,408#40
@khabarfouri_arzedigital · 30,000#41
@ali_cryptoc · 12,162#42
@Shahryaarrajaeecrypto · 435,486#43
@IRAN_LEAK · 4,469#44
@ccoineres · 20,626#45
@lordcryptovipbot · 25,768#46
@ch_amozshe_sirvan · 6,131#47
@artavip · 6,709#48
@arzdigitalb · 54,783#49
@Signal_Alpha_Futures · 40,245#50
@hajicryptooo · 7,361#51
@MawtinCrypto_vip · 4,961,974#52
@mini_whales1 · 3,445#53
@best_siignal · 33,883#54
@CryptoT248 · 53,692#55
@signnal_free · 9,678#56
@parstrade1 · 1,691#57
@fundora_finance · 6,809#58
@Real_Ayhan · 113,782#59
@Ar3yBiT · 708,843#60
@karaco2022 · 16,659#61
@persianarzanalysis · 5,297#62
@naghdexx · 31#63
@telonews_fa · 86,149#64
@alirezamehrabi_com · 115,250#65
@cloobmali · 107,909#66
@cryptoiranchanel · 18,301#67
@FREEVIP_SIGNALSM · 8,089#68
@amir_ramzali · 113,230#69
@crypto_gorg · 3,967#70
@arzdigital · 108,874#71
@memecoins_news · 9,373#72
@trade_hadi · 447,836#73
@dexcexcrypto · 1,254#74
@RheaCrypto · 2,117#75
@Crypto_Club2 · 3,621#76
@Arzineh_Officials · 32,543#77
@CryptoHaj · 359,371#78
@cryptoo_professor · 1,204#79
@Mr_Haji_Bit · 6,330#80
@nahang_trader · 4,918#81
@mr_hounter · 5,934#82
@CoinYek · 12,449#83
@ChartsPrice · 82,725#84
@plus_sarmayeh · 2,261#85
@future_arkacoin · 29,012#86
@RooyaBitcoiner · 5,537#87
@tradecity_pro · 76,663#88
@varzesh3 · 1,294,925#89
@cryptobyalireza · 37,244#90
@arash_timess · 425,641#91
@ProxyMTProto_tel · 1,240,456#92
@whale_alert_io · 300,889#93
@proxymtproto · 11,940,791#94
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@traderpasha · 102,110
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@mrsignal · 181,569
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@crypto_ssignal · 22,224
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
@z1m2y3 · 36,937
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
@GOLDVSBTC1 · 44,133
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@Caspian_Crypto · 84,695
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
@IranMuskNews_VPN · 21,876
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
@Signal_Alpha · 167,505
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@Signal_Alpha_Futures · 40,245
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@strategyclose · 31,200
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 5 September 2026
@CryptoT248 · 53,692
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
@analysis_altcoins · 34,585
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 106,677
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@TROON · 1,617,080
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
@tatcoinn · 43,808
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
@CryptoMarket_BitBoy · 22,570
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 September 2026
@fxamarket · 45,151
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
@Shahryaarrajaeecrypto · 435,486
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
@Crypto_Azarmi · 54,516
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
@analysis_bitcoin · 31,255
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
@turbo_mtproxy · 67,628
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
@Radcryptosignal · 95,494
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
@crypto_swingsignal · 22,168
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
@mahdiazimi_classic_patterns · 84,939
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کریپتو با امیرسام | CBA” (@amirsambtc), 110,983 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amirsambtc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.