Channel
@strongyogasamara
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,148subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001702462852 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @strongyogasamara |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/strongyogasamara |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 2,148 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 2,150 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 2,151 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:26 | 2,145 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 2,146 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 2,148 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 2,149 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 2,146 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 2,148 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
197 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 90 | 45.7% | |
| ❤ | 63 | 32.0% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 6.60% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 3.55% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 3.05% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 2.54% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.03% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.508% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.508% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я кстати напоминаю, да, что на повторное прохождение курса «Практика» работает скидка в 50% от полной стоимости тарифа. Т.е если вы проходили курс, можно зайти на базовый тариф по стоимости 10.500 👌 Если это ваш случай, то напишите мне в личку - я выставлю вам ссылку на оплату 🤓 Ну и сегодня запишу подробное голосовое о том, что мы вообще там будем делать.
🔥1
Я снова хочу вписаться 🤗
Частая история: на секунду захожу в Бакасану, но баланс толком не держится 🤔Вроде и силы есть, но почему-то ничего не работает. Что есть смысл проверить? Чаще всего, многие мелкие усилия в Бакасане прирастают автоматически на фоне в целом комплексной практики. Но обратить внимание можно на: 📌 работу ладоней, вообще их постановку и распределение веса 📌 сгибание бедра и скругление спины, которые дают более плотную г…
❤12🔥3
Зайду с ноги😅 вообще сам по себе прогресс в практике асан вообще не обязателен, если вы в эту сторону не работаете, и вам не интересно. Но работа с физическим телом накладывает серьезный эффект на работу психики, поэтому лично я считаю, что работать с телом - важно. Так что по прогрессу? 🤔 Ко мне часто обращаются практики конкретно с этим запросом - нет прогресса где-то, делать просто как раньше - невозможно, потом…
❤17👍4🔥4🥰1
Продолжаем разговор про знакомые асаны, где всегда есть вопросы🤓 а Лоласану ещё и никто не любит 🤣 Чего реально может не хватить - сгибания бедра, сгибания позвоночника, сгибания в коленном суставе. Т.е того, что существенно может повлиять на вашу группировку и сделать её плотнее. Да, тут можно ещё упомянуть про разведение (протракцию) лопаток в стороны, но как показывает практика, многие работают на слегка недодел…
🔥19❤6❤🔥1👍1
Я фсё🤪 Старт был вчера в 21:40. Температура в районе 12-13 градусов. Я сомневалась, но в итоге бежала в шортах и футболке - и правильно сделала! Как прошло? Первые 3 км держали 5:25-5:35. Потом после затяжного подъема в километр примерно меня слегка подубило, снизили темп, тут ещё одна горка. Из носа льет, дышать неудобно. В общем первый круг закончился, и второй круг так же: сначала подъем вверх, потом небольшой …
🔥33❤11🎉7👏6🦄1
Что там по этим связкам и откуда (по моему мнению) может расти вообще вся эта история
❤13🔥6💯4🦄1
На днях получила такой вот коммент в ВКонтакте под видео про Навасану 😅 И два скрина с реакцией коллег🤪 Щас запишу голосовое - свое мнение на эту тему, если у вас до сих пор есть сомнения кипятить или не кипятить тянуть или не тянуть
🤣13
И ещё новости про мою стопу - топаю от подолога ☝️
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥8😁3🤝2
После Баддха Конасаны логично спросили - а можно про Упавишту? Нужно 😁 В основе те же направления: сгибание бедра, отведение и внешняя ротация, но степень усилий отличается. Что бы я проверяла? 📌 отдельно работу таза - наклоны таза, всякие круги и тд. На согнутых коленях все эти движения даются проще. И чем больше угол между корпусом и бедром - тем тоже проще, поэтому и ставим руки за таз. Сначала отстройте все дв…
🔥16❤4
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @strongyogasamara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Йога в Самаре | StrongYoga c Соней Кутумовой” (@strongyogasamara), 2,148 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strongyogasamara.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.