Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kanal Sturmzeichen

Channel

Kanal Sturmzeichen

@sturmzeichen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,883subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001229050702
TypeChannel
Username@sturmzeichen
Created4 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sturmzeichen

Growth

6,8716,8926,881.56 August 2026 — 6,886 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,887 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,885 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,888 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,886 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,884 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,877 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,871 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,892 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,883 subscribers6,8836 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,868–6,895 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 11:366,883-9
27 Aug 2026, 20:046,892+21
25 Aug 2026, 03:426,871-6
21 Aug 2026, 11:436,877-7
18 Aug 2026, 02:116,884-2
15 Aug 2026, 07:136,886-2
12 Aug 2026, 07:136,888+3
9 Aug 2026, 08:026,885-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:446,887+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:326,886first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 6,883 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,230
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held44 (31 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total44,276
Reactions total825
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 18s
Average length
2m 18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

907 reactions across 40 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍39043.0%
27129.9%
👏525.73%
🔥353.86%
🤣272.98%
🫡212.32%
🤡141.54%
😁131.43%
🙏121.32%
🤬111.21%
🤯111.21%
🤮101.10%
🙈90.992%
60.662%
❤‍🔥50.551%
👎40.441%
💯30.331%
🤷‍♂30.331%
😈20.221%
🤔20.221%
6 further kinds60.662%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,016 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC684 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🚢 Wenn der Atem stockt – Ceuta und das Erwachen von Raspails „Heerlager der Heiligen“ von Patrick Tannert, für nsheute.com Die spanische Exklave Ceuta an der nordafrikanischen Küste wurde im Juli zum Brennpunkt und Brennglas der europäischen Migrationskrise. Zehntausende Menschen, die wie eine Flutwelle die mit Natodraht und modernster Sensorik aufgerüsteten Grenzanlagen stürmen oder über das offene Meer die Sperrwe

👍11💯2🌚1

19 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC653 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🧳 Es geht eine N.S. Heute auf Reisen 🚂 Grüße aus Erfurt, Mühlhausen (Thüringen), Bitterfeld, Dessau und Berlin-Wannsee Vielen Dank an unseren Leser für die Zusendung! 🌊 KANAL STURMZEICHEN - @sturmzeichen

👍10

18 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC961 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📚 Christian Illner - Die Tiefe Rechte Christian Illner schreibt, an Heidegger geschult, über die Notwendigkeit einer Gefährtenschaft, deren Kern er Tiefe Rechte nennt. Er beschreibt in seinen Überlegungen eine Arbeitsteilung mit fließenden Übergängen von einer rechten Oberfläche über eine vermittelnde Struktur zu dem, was als tiefe Rechte versöhnend, bündelnd, einnehmend wirken kann und muss. Wichtig und interessan

👍13🤮4🤡3🤣21🍌1🤷‍♂1

18 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC933 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @horizont_telegramPhoto

Mainstream-Medien haben kein Interesse an Diversität auf Symbolfotos bei solchen Artikeln. Absolute Realsatire >>>

9🙈9👍5🤯2🔥1🖕1

18 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC989 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Das Fanal von Zeitz – Vor 50 Jahren verbrannte sich der Pfarrer Oskar Brüsewitz von Gastautor Benedikt Marktl Es war der Vormittag des 18. August 1976, als das beschauliche Zeitz, eine Mittelstadt südlich von Leipzig, zum Schauplatz einer aufsehenerregenden Protestaktion wurde. Die rund 300 Menschen auf dem Zeitzer Marktplatz sahen an diesem Tag einen Kombi des Herstellers Wartburg vor der Michaeliskirche vorfahre

🔥10🙏4🤡2

17 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈1,040 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📚 Abdallah Melaouhi - "Ich sah seinen Mördern in die Augen." Die letzten Jahre und der Tod von Rudolf Heß Abdallah Melaouhi ist der Kronzeuge für die Ermordung von Rudolf Heß. In mehreren Fernsehauftritten und zahlreichen Interviews versuchte er 1988/89 mit Wolf Rüdiger Heß, Dr. Alfred Seidl und Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Spann die Weltöffentlichkeit vom Mord an Heß zu überzeugen. In diesem Buch berichtet er von unbekannte

28🫡14

17 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC866 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @harzverteidigen

Sommergewitter 4 / Sambas gegen Vans – Vans gegen Sambas! – Teil 2 Ja, auf dem vor uns liegenden Parkplatz entsteht nach und nach ein Mob mit schwarz Vermummten. Sie strömen auf uns zu, um die 20 Leute. Wir zu elft, in leichter Unterzahl, 3 Berliner und unsere achtköpfige Busbesatzung. Karsten sagt laut und bestimmt: „Stefanie, ab ins Auto, fahrt Richtung Auffahrt, wartet da!“ Die Mädels verschwinden im Auto und

👍8

17 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC947 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🧳 Es geht eine N.S. Heute auf Reisen Grüße aus Weimar: Bahnhofsgebäude, Gauforum, Neues Museum, Goethe-Schiller-Denkmal und Haus der Weimarer Republik. Vielen Dank an unseren Leser für die Zusendung! 🌊 KANAL STURMZEICHEN - @sturmzeichen

13

17 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC962 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @harzverteidigenPhoto

Sommergewitter 4 / Sambas gegen Vans – Vans gegen Sambas! – Teil 1 Die Scheibenwischer des 9-Sitzers haben Mühe, den Starkregen zu verdrängen. Zum wiederholten Male brettert ein Sommergewitter über uns hinweg. So schnell, wie es kam, ging es auch. Ich setze den Blinker und fahre die Ausfahrt zum Rastplatz runter. Neben mir sitzt Bockwurst, der Strippenzieher und Vernetzer. Bockwurst deshalb, weil er es an einem Dem

👍63

16 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC≈1,030 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @harzverteidigen

⬆️⬆️⬆️ Karsten trägt ebenfalls eine weiße Armbinde. Ist so ungefähr 1 1/2 Köpfe größer als ich, blond, blauäugig, ein Ochse. Trägt Zimmermannshose, weißes Hemd und Sambas. Karsten ist ein Völkischer. „Willste nochmal auf die Zwölf? Vielleicht hilft das, is irgendwat in deiner Birne nicht richtig? Träumer!“, antwortet er lachend. Er zuckt mit den Schultern und sagt: „Keine Ahnung, ob das August war? Könnte sein!“ D

👍125

16 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC952 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @harzverteidigenPhoto

Sommergewitter 3 / Bayerisches Städtchen Wir stehen auf einer breiten Straße inmitten einer kleinen bayerischen Stadt. Es dürfte August sein, irgendwann in der ersten Dekade der 2000er. Es riecht nach frischem Regen, ein Sommergewitter ergoss sich vor wenigen Minuten über uns, wir werden von warmen Winden umweht. Verschiedene Blöcke, verschiedene Fahnen, mehrheitlich schwarze. Vor jedem Block ein Transpi, auf unsere

👍115

15 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC≈1,040 views14 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @harzverteidigenPhoto

Sommergewitter 2 / Garten inmitten hoher Mauern Am nächsten Morgen, nach dem letzten Frühstück, antreten, Morgenappell zum Abschied. Die Halstücher sind gebunden. Alle wurden zugewiesen. Die große Betonplatte mit quadratischen Gehwegsteinen in der Mitte des Lagers diente als Ablage für die vielen Gepäckstücke. Meine Reisetasche stellte ich dorthin, wo mit Kreide „MfS“ auf den Boden geschrieben wurde. Karsten kam auc

14

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @sturmzeichen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 17,115 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Freie Sachsen
@freiesachsen · 110,297
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kanal Sturmzeichen” (@sturmzeichen), 6,883 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sturmzeichen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.