Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,351–10,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 06:56
10,416
-16
7 Sept 2026, 01:22
10,432
-24
4 Sept 2026, 07:01
10,456
-15
2 Sept 2026, 16:34
10,471
-8
1 Sept 2026, 14:44
10,479
-21
31 Aug 2026, 15:27
10,500
-24
30 Aug 2026, 12:57
10,524
-21
29 Aug 2026, 14:25
10,545
-6
28 Aug 2026, 17:42
10,551
-13
27 Aug 2026, 17:58
10,564
-29
26 Aug 2026, 20:25
10,593
-14
25 Aug 2026, 18:26
10,607
+18
24 Aug 2026, 15:42
10,589
+6
22 Aug 2026, 23:06
10,583
+72
21 Aug 2026, 09:14
10,511
+26
20 Aug 2026, 10:58
10,485
+13
19 Aug 2026, 12:38
10,472
+52
18 Aug 2026, 15:08
10,420
+36
17 Aug 2026, 14:18
10,384
-9
16 Aug 2026, 08:07
10,393
first reading
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 10,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
58 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
35,821
Reactions total
2,583
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,546 reactions across 50 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,927
54.3%
🔥
807
22.8%
💅
372
10.5%
💯
115
3.24%
🍓
106
2.99%
😁
68
1.92%
🍾
47
1.33%
👍
35
0.987%
😍
18
0.508%
❤🔥
13
0.367%
🤪
13
0.367%
⚡
9
0.254%
🥰
8
0.226%
custom 5262554476383858158
6
0.169%
🤓
2
0.056%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,762 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С платьем я определилась быстро, мне нужен был совершенно конкретный образ. А аксессуары вокруг него сложились сами собой, потому что наряд был близок к стилю, который я выбираю в обычной жизни. База и умеренная женственность: драпировки, красивые разрезы, длина макси, акцент на талию.
Мне самой очень понравился образ, который получился. И у меня на это 5 причин:
1. Платье с вырезом на груди, значит, надо бахнуть ц…
Супруг роскошный в полном образе от HENDERSON
Часто вижу, что нарядцам невесты уделяют кратно больше внимания, чем образу жениха. Вот вы, например, видели хоть одного мужчину, который переоделся бы на собственной свадьбе?
Искренне считаю, что впечатление создают обе половинки и нужно все детально продумать, чтобы эффект был вау! И главное — обязательно посадить костюм по фигуре. Ну не бывает так, чтоб шили прямо на…
Штош, свадебное платье после всех приключений выглядит так, будто я хорошенько так вымыла подолом пол в ресторане, в студии, а заодно и в окрестностях. А ещё немножко приняла на грудь (буквально) игристое. Спасибо, что не красненькое))
Что вы делали со своими платьями? Храните дома, выбросили в мусорку тёмной ночью, удачно продали на Авито? Расскажите, а?
В школу в конце лета меня не тянет, но вот чему-то поучиться — да! Из последних идей: латина, скалолазание, макияж и причёски 👀
Чему учиться? — это слоган коллекции Back to school бренда ECRU. Бунтарский стилёк с гранжевыми, азиатскими и женственными элементами мне прям очень зашёл.
Классно, что «школьная» коллекция у ребят получилась не ностальгической — с фартучками и белыми рубашками со стоячими воротничками, пр…
Неделю хожу с камуфляжем на ногтях, уже хочу обратно к своим голышам и прозрачному лаку. У Вики ещё пост про домашний маникюр нашла — список самого нужного, чтобы делать маникюр дома.
Там и про годные пилки, и про кутикулу, и про лаки. Хотелось бы быть экономной, но не в этой жизни, подавайте 50 оттенков прозрачного лака!
Чууууть не упустила классное летнее сочетание: голубой + шоколад.
И почему только к концу лета понимаешь, сколько потенциальных луков не ношены??
🔥42❤32💅6💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @sumochka_bye_bye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Blue Unicorn @blueunicorn_ru · 33,348 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
Визуальная манка @storiesMKramer · 28,665 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
Субъективная мода @didi_pro_ali · 31,903 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 5 September 2026
жопа луковичкой @dash_kupi_garazh · 30,925 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Встала и пошла! @vstalaipohla · 33,337 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Ирина | Зауютить 🕯 @casacozy · 30,778 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
Привет, эстет! @helloesthete · 28,221 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Дизигн интерьера @desingokey · 35,242 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
Унесённые дизайном @interior_aesthetics · 27,695 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сумочка, мы уходим!” (@sumochka_bye_bye), 10,416 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sumochka_bye_bye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.