Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СУПЕР СТАС (тут любят еду )

Channel

СУПЕР СТАС (тут любят еду )

@supestas1

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

394,887subscribers

-24,553 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001445715382
TypeChannel
Username@supestas1
DescriptionБлогер , любитель еды! Сотрудничество: @KsenuaEgorova https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=677d145e4e740947be133ca8&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created16 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/supestas1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

394,887419,440407,163.56 August 2026 — 419,440 subscribers6 August 2026 — 419,440 subscribers6 August 2026 — 419,308 subscribers7 August 2026 — 419,141 subscribers8 August 2026 — 418,956 subscribers9 August 2026 — 418,606 subscribers10 August 2026 — 418,376 subscribers11 August 2026 — 418,139 subscribers12 August 2026 — 417,937 subscribers13 August 2026 — 417,765 subscribers15 August 2026 — 417,461 subscribers16 August 2026 — 417,032 subscribers17 August 2026 — 416,782 subscribers18 August 2026 — 416,484 subscribers19 August 2026 — 416,177 subscribers20 August 2026 — 415,807 subscribers22 August 2026 — 415,466 subscribers24 August 2026 — 414,987 subscribers25 August 2026 — 414,711 subscribers26 August 2026 — 414,301 subscribers27 August 2026 — 414,095 subscribers28 August 2026 — 413,863 subscribers29 August 2026 — 413,605 subscribers30 August 2026 — 413,223 subscribers31 August 2026 — 412,942 subscribers1 September 2026 — 412,659 subscribers2 September 2026 — 412,279 subscribers3 September 2026 — 411,832 subscribers5 September 2026 — 411,452 subscribers8 September 2026 — 410,535 subscribers11 September 2026 — 409,635 subscribers13 September 2026 — 409,074 subscribers15 September 2026 — 408,422 subscribers17 September 2026 — 407,921 subscribers19 September 2026 — 407,304 subscribers26 September 2026 — 405,620 subscribers4 October 2026 — 403,582 subscribers9 October 2026 — 402,482 subscribers13 October 2026 — 401,402 subscribers14 October 2026 — 400,908 subscribers15 October 2026 — 400,533 subscribers16 October 2026 — 400,236 subscribers17 October 2026 — 400,065 subscribers18 October 2026 — 399,785 subscribers19 October 2026 — 399,474 subscribers20 October 2026 — 399,178 subscribers22 October 2026 — 398,946 subscribers23 October 2026 — 398,618 subscribers24 October 2026 — 398,227 subscribers25 October 2026 — 397,674 subscribers26 October 2026 — 397,287 subscribers27 October 2026 — 396,965 subscribers28 October 2026 — 396,669 subscribers29 October 2026 — 396,314 subscribers30 October 2026 — 396,025 subscribers31 October 2026 — 395,783 subscribers1 November 2026 — 395,563 subscribers2 November 2026 — 395,290 subscribers4 November 2026 — 395,083 subscribers5 November 2026 — 394,887 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -24,553. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 391,204–423,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 02:16394,887-196
4 Nov 2026, 00:16395,083-207
2 Nov 2026, 21:16395,290-273
1 Nov 2026, 17:47395,563-220
31 Oct 2026, 15:36395,783-242
30 Oct 2026, 14:16396,025-289
29 Oct 2026, 14:00396,314-355
28 Oct 2026, 11:06396,669-296
27 Oct 2026, 10:08396,965-322
26 Oct 2026, 09:19397,287-387
25 Oct 2026, 06:50397,674-553
24 Oct 2026, 05:45398,227-391
23 Oct 2026, 02:35398,618-328
22 Oct 2026, 02:38398,946-232
20 Oct 2026, 20:46399,178-296
19 Oct 2026, 18:09399,474-311
18 Oct 2026, 15:07399,785-280
17 Oct 2026, 15:47400,065-171
16 Oct 2026, 19:20400,236-297
15 Oct 2026, 19:07400,533first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 188 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.6%
avg views ÷ 394,887 subscribers
Avg views / post
73,400
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held85 (2 July 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total2,203,200
Reactions total22,618
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,210
Videos
≈145
Links
≈763

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

99,346 reactions across 85 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤80,19280.7%
🔥11,47611.6%
😁3,1313.15%
😍2,5442.56%
😱2,0032.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99,346 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
332
across the posts below
Posts paid on
45
of 85 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
202
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @supestas1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 30 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (3.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

30 Oct 2026, 05:56 UTC≈64,400 views854 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Решил утро начать с ЧР - чилловая раскайфовка.

❤727🔥86😁36😱4😍1

29 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC≈67,000 views502 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤407🔥56😍30😱9

29 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC≈67,000 views905 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Почему они такие смешные😂😂😂 кидайте смешные фотки ваших питомцев

❤784🔥76😁43😱2

28 Oct 2026, 10:24 UTC≈69,800 views946 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Кто куда а я в Дубае на падел😂 (угадай с кем ролик снимаю 30 числа)

❤773🔥111😁48😱14

26 Oct 2026, 13:57 UTC≈72,400 views1,091 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

Ролик отсняли 🔥

❤894🔥164😁25😍4😱4

25 Oct 2026, 13:27 UTC≈74,300 views957 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Найти белёвскую пастилу в Дубае - вот это я точно не ожидал! 😂😂 В последнее время я подсел на неё.

❤791🔥98😁63😱5

24 Oct 2026, 20:50 UTC≈75,100 views511 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Ну че кто Мовсар или Волк?

❤429🔥57😍22😱3

24 Oct 2026, 20:43 UTC≈72,300 views407 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Ну что вернусь в Москву делать розыгрыш?)

❤363😱31🔥9😍4

24 Oct 2026, 20:31 UTC≈71,700 views544 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026

Заслуженная победа Петра Яна💪💪 просто легенда

❤443🔥64😁34😱3

24 Oct 2026, 20:09 UTC≈71,900 views455 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Что за бой, что за эмоции 🤯🤯🤯! Вживую это просто что-то нереальное.

❤395🔥48😱12

24 Oct 2026, 19:40 UTC≈71,700 views373 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤316🔥46😱9😍2

24 Oct 2026, 18:20 UTC≈70,300 views704 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

Пробрался к октагону 😂😂

❤601🔥68😁32😱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @supestas1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@supestas1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @supestas1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
11 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
42 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Никита Сударь ТГК
@sudarchnl · 62,157
#1
Алексей Столяров блогер
@Stolyaric · 272,184
#2
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 732,701
#3
ЭМИЛЬ И ЕГО СЕМЬЯ
@emiltelegramm · 141,561
#4
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,439,513
#5
ДАНИЛА ГОРИЛЛА 🦍
@danila_gorilla · 633,724
#6
ШАСТУН
@shastoonchannel · 230,365
#7
дипинс 🤢
@deepinstv · 504,019
#8
EDISON FAMILY
@edisonfamilia · 766,929
#9
Кукояка
@kukoyaka · 89,159
#10
ГАБАР
@hardgabar · 352,009
#11
Полина печатает…
@savekinaofficial · 7,406
#12
Глент 🚀
@vladglenttg · 568,713
#13
Кукояка на связи♥️
@Panarinka · 77,902
#14
ЖИЗНЬ МОНТАЖНАЯ
@artem_editor · 893 (as read 10 August 2026)
#15
Милс Кел (Play)
@meels_kel · 330,350
#16
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,107,105
#17
Даник и Тайная комната
@dikiidanik · 386,052
#18
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 675,547
#19
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,227,923
#20
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 219,029
#21
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,046,676
#22
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,391,668
#23
DILARA
@dilalara753 · 267,327
#24
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 189,825
#25
ХАЗЯЕВА В МОМЕНТЕ
@xazayeva · 373,040
#26
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,093,467
#27
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 606,513
#28
GENSYXA
@gensyka · 273,114
#29
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,814,162
#30
Pozov Live
@pozov · 250,950
#31
STOPBAN OFFICIAL
@stopbaba · 183,144
#32
Ekatze007💙🌸🐱
@ekatze007 · 58,096
#33
каечка
@bykae4ka · 212,513
#34
ИМПРОВИЗАТОРЫ
@theimprovisatorsshow · 235,287
#35
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,535,796
#36
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 3,900,305
#37
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 926,828
#38
СЕРГЕЙ МАТВИЕНКО
@yamamatvienko · 143,217
#39
Lovv66
@lovvdoublesix · 153,835
#40
Вишенка 🍒
@mamavisshenka · 120,515
#41
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 241,896
#42
Маша и Роберт (Герберы)
@thegerberslive · 623,711
#43
люблю
@love_thxs · 437,016
#44
GB FAMILY
@GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 94,185
#45
Влад Бумага A4
@A4omg · 439,506
#46
Гаврилина зе бест :3
@Gavril1nna · 137,326
#47
BUDA +
@budaog · 359,369
#48
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 143,363
#49
Пеппер Поттс на минималках | Арина Тучина
@rinatuchina · 1,848
#50
Москва Live
@msk_live · 2,388
#51
НМШ
@nmshhub · 673,756
#52
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,693,403
#53
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 374,098
#54
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 906,174
#55
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 385,016
#56
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 415,094
#57
Первый Московский
@mosguru · 3,410,337
#58
Джарахов Эльдар Казанфарович крутой рэпер офигенный тиктокер и вообще очень талантливый человек
@dzharakhov1 · 94,834
#59

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Никита Сударь ТГК
@sudarchnl · 62,157
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
Алексей Столяров блогер
@Stolyaric · 272,184
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
ГАБАР
@hardgabar · 352,009
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 August 2026
MAX NATCORN
@maxnatcorn · 114,790
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
ЭМИЛЬ И ЕГО СЕМЬЯ
@emiltelegramm · 141,561
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
Даник и Тайная комната
@dikiidanik · 386,052
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 August 2026
Дюшес
@duchess_official · 274,829
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
НИКИТОС
@NIKITOSTEAM · 314,698
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
Lorenzo.Bagnati 🇮🇹
@Lorenzobagnati · 60,344
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
ЧЕРНЕЦ
@chernetsa · 210,505
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
Яна Зенина/Яяна
@yanazenina · 213,296
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 September 2026
САНЯ МОНТАЖНИК
@sanyamontajnik · 176,278
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 21 August 2026
Вера Бонд 🖤
@vera_bond007 · 87,578
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 675,547
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 August 2026
NEMIFIST
@Nemifist · 79,717
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,107,105
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 August 2026
Ведущий Фуд-блогер
@foodblogger · 62,336
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
KROSSNEWS
@krossnewsss · 114,374
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
КОБЯКОВ
@vladkobyakovv · 81,946
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
AkStar 🎸
@akstar1music · 133,857
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
Награда за еду (медиа о гастрономии)
@nagradazaedu · 21,364
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
Шоу Воли
@volyashow · 54,976
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

youtu.be4 posts · 3 July 2026 – 5 August 2026 · example post
vkvideo.ru2 posts · 14 July 2026 – 28 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СУПЕР СТАС (тут любят еду )” (@supestas1), 394,887 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/supestas1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.