Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,692–6,937 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 07:42
6,720
-11
12 Sept 2026, 07:16
6,731
-19
7 Sept 2026, 18:16
6,750
-13
2 Sept 2026, 21:28
6,763
-11
31 Aug 2026, 02:54
6,774
-14
27 Aug 2026, 23:28
6,788
-17
24 Aug 2026, 15:24
6,805
-20
21 Aug 2026, 00:54
6,825
-12
17 Aug 2026, 21:23
6,837
-18
14 Aug 2026, 12:15
6,855
-20
11 Aug 2026, 02:03
6,875
-26
8 Aug 2026, 05:02
6,901
-8
7 Aug 2026, 07:01
6,909
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 43 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,796 reactions across 41 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,196
66.6%
🔥
184
10.2%
🙏
178
9.91%
❤🔥
101
5.62%
👍
56
3.12%
💯
32
1.78%
custom 5463289097336405244
26
1.45%
🥰
7
0.39%
custom 5789410873269292841
5
0.278%
custom 5789477419492576770
5
0.278%
😍
3
0.167%
🤔
2
0.111%
💘
1
0.056%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,796 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 41 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sveta_rotan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Суждение - это категория ума и суда (гордыни)
Может ли человек иметь какое либо суждение?
Дает ли суждение нам опору? Или это является очередной иллюзий и концептом ума?
Есть прекрасное слово - принцип. Да, оно не русское. По русски - кон.
Мы жили по кону. То есть по своду определенных устоев. В устоях нет суждений, и уж тем более категоричности. Это были столпы, о которые опирался дух. Это понятия за пределами чел…
Вчера кино смотрела «Святой Отец» про жизнь святого Нектария.
Там был эпизод:
Он директор школы и к нему пришли спорящие между собой ученики. Он, выслушав, берет для себя аскезу на три дня голода.
Вот в действии формула: «Я причина всего…»
Любое снаружи, есть отражение того, что внутри
Чтобы поменять снаружи, надо поменять внутри.
Так святые целили. Собой.
Светлана, подскажите, пожалуйста, как быть женщине, если рядом сейчас нет мужчины, на которого можно опереться? Возможно, я пока не готова к отношениям или в чём-то ещё закрыта от мужчин. Но при этом жизнь требует от меня быть сильной, самостоятельно зарабатывать, принимать решения и поднимать детей. Как в такой ситуации идти по женскому пути, если мужской опоры пока нет?
Имя дает сначала в ум понимание кто я есть, какой и зачем.
Потом, проживая опыт, у нас появляется знание о себе. Не просто информация, а вера в теле, потому что информация подтверждается опытом, ситуациями и обстоятельствами.
Далее мы приходим к тому, чтобы увидеть точки расширения себя, усложнения и/или упрощения.
Но в базе у нас стоит пол.
В одном из девяти базовых законах родовых систем, есть "Закон половой прин…
Проголосуйте про какое имя на этой неделе интересно
Светлана17%
Ирина27%
Ольга37%
Дарья21%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
«И остави нам долги наши
Яко же мы оставляем должником нашим» из молитвы «Отче наш»
Сегодня крутится эта фраза на повторе
В переводе ее трактуют
«И прости нам долги наши, как мы прощаем должникам нашим»…
И тут прям корежит
Есть формула, когда делаем разделение при слиянии или растворении, и там фраза
«И я оставляю тебе твое, а себе свое»
И тут как будто тоже история каждому остаться при своем, а не простить и б…
Карта-ресурс
Неделя 17 августа - 23 августа
Интуитивно выбери одну из карт, твоя подсказка куда обратить внимание на этой неделе 🌿
Краткая расшифровка в комментариях
Духовное развитие по-женски.
Что такое духовное развитие?
Это процесс познания самого себя.
Что значит познание женской сути и природы?
Это способность проводить, проявлять, материализовывать любовь.
Основной ипостасью женской любви является смирение
Второй - душевность, мягкость (строгость)
Духовное развитие женщины - это процесс приращения смирения и любви к своей семье, людям, миру и природе.
Сейчас женщины д…
❤61👍10💯10🙏7
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @sveta_rotan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Проголосуйте про какое имя на этой неделе интересно
Светлана17%
Ирина27%
Ольга37%
Дарья21%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Zarina del Mar/Про Тебя @WhatevaCircle · 114,007 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Светлана Ускова про имена” (@sveta_rotan), 6,720 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sveta_rotan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
