Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for tribe by tN1R

Channel

tribe by tN1R

@tN1Rcs

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

55,962subscribers

+3,076 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001580830429
TypeChannel
Username@tN1Rcs
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/tN1Rcs

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

43,700 average views per post against 55,887 subscribers — an engagement rate of 78.2%. Across the 8,271 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,975 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.04% and 20.7%, with a median of 10.4%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (24 September 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Posts measured10 of 10 published in the window (0 exact, 10 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled437,200
Mature posts only87.7% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers55,887 measured 23 October 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,271 channels · p10 2.56% · p25 5.04% · p50 10.4% · p75 20.7% · p90 35.3%
Position in cohort99.311th percentile · 7.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.02% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

52,56655,96254,2646 August 2026 — 52,886 subscribers6 August 2026 — 52,886 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,880 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,866 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,838 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,821 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,781 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,763 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,729 subscribers14 August 2026 — 52,742 subscribers16 August 2026 — 52,716 subscribers17 August 2026 — 52,684 subscribers18 August 2026 — 52,661 subscribers19 August 2026 — 52,621 subscribers20 August 2026 — 52,589 subscribers21 August 2026 — 52,566 subscribers22 August 2026 — 53,196 subscribers24 August 2026 — 54,484 subscribers25 August 2026 — 54,607 subscribers26 August 2026 — 54,637 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54,653 subscribers28 August 2026 — 54,657 subscribers30 August 2026 — 54,639 subscribers31 August 2026 — 54,633 subscribers1 September 2026 — 54,669 subscribers2 September 2026 — 54,681 subscribers3 September 2026 — 54,670 subscribers6 September 2026 — 54,643 subscribers9 September 2026 — 55,241 subscribers11 September 2026 — 55,240 subscribers13 September 2026 — 55,402 subscribers15 September 2026 — 55,455 subscribers17 September 2026 — 55,495 subscribers24 September 2026 — 55,402 subscribers3 October 2026 — 55,214 subscribers8 October 2026 — 55,539 subscribers12 October 2026 — 55,932 subscribers14 October 2026 — 55,933 subscribers15 October 2026 — 55,925 subscribers16 October 2026 — 55,881 subscribers17 October 2026 — 55,870 subscribers18 October 2026 — 55,845 subscribers19 October 2026 — 55,814 subscribers20 October 2026 — 55,795 subscribers21 October 2026 — 55,765 subscribers22 October 2026 — 55,773 subscribers23 October 2026 — 55,887 subscribers24 October 2026 — 55,962 subscribers6 August 202624 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 80 days, net +3,076. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,057–56,471 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 17:4655,962+75
23 Oct 2026, 19:1155,887+114
22 Oct 2026, 21:0055,773+8
21 Oct 2026, 15:1455,765-30
20 Oct 2026, 14:3955,795-19
19 Oct 2026, 12:4655,814-31
18 Oct 2026, 12:4655,845-25
17 Oct 2026, 13:3855,870-11
16 Oct 2026, 14:0655,881-44
15 Oct 2026, 11:5955,925-8
14 Oct 2026, 11:3055,933+1
12 Oct 2026, 19:5655,932+393
8 Oct 2026, 08:3655,539+325
3 Oct 2026, 17:2055,214-188
24 Sept 2026, 23:3755,402-93
17 Sept 2026, 03:5555,495+40
15 Sept 2026, 07:1555,455+53
13 Sept 2026, 16:4155,402+162
11 Sept 2026, 18:5755,240-1
9 Sept 2026, 08:3755,241first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 159 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.1%
avg views ÷ 55,962 subscribers
Avg views / post
43,700
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held53 (28 June 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total437,200
Reactions total22,061
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 09:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

116,880 reactions across 52 posts, in 58 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤86,33273.9%
❤‍🔥6,1815.29%
🔥5,4554.67%
😭3,4242.93%
😢3,4072.91%
💘2,3382.00%
😁1,8371.57%
🤣1,6151.38%
👍1,4561.25%
🤡8130.696%
🥰7940.679%
💋3620.31%
🍾3410.292%
👎2540.217%
⚡2300.197%
👏2010.172%
👀1540.132%
😈1190.102%
💔1120.096%
💯1120.096%
38 further kinds1,3431.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116,880 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
563
across the posts below
Posts paid on
41
of 52 we hold a reading for · 79%
Most on one post
82
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tN1Rcs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Oct 2026, 15:19 UTC≈4,500 views434 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

📼📼📼 TEAM SPIRIT: СЛЕПОЙ, ГЛУХОЙ, НЕМОЙ КУКИНГ 🧑‍🍳 В новом видео magixx, sh1ro и tN1R будут готовить в необычных условиях: один не видит, второй не слышит, а третий не может говорить. Справятся ли парни с челленджем и какую оценку их блюду поставит секретный гость? 👇 ❤❤❤❤ — титульный партнер Team Spirit. До 10 000 новым пользователям ❤ 😀 Okko 🎞 YouTube

❤349😁45🍾21❤‍🔥7⚡3💘3💋2🔥2

23 Oct 2026, 14:23 UTC≈40,800 views1,184 reactions15 Starsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤939🔥115👍68💘19🐳11👾11💋11👎3

10 Oct 2026, 20:55 UTC≈36,900 views3,666 reactions49 Starsread 24 October 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😭2,930❤378😢172💔73❤‍🔥31👎29🫡23😘11

9 Oct 2026, 19:11 UTC≈44,000 views3,907 reactions4 Starsread 24 October 2026

Ну и нубчики , хоть Анубис не закинули ⚠️

❤3,060😁472🔥201🤡94👍17💘17💋13😡11

7 Oct 2026, 20:14 UTC≈46,800 views2,654 reactions13 Starsread 24 October 2026

3-2

❤2,070🔥298🥰124🍾51🤣35❤‍🔥20👍16👾16

6 Oct 2026, 13:56 UTC≈51,200 views2,903 reactions5 Starsread 24 October 2026

2-2

😢2,220❤268👎114🤡112🖕55💘50🤯31😨30

5 Oct 2026, 16:18 UTC≈48,900 views2,192 reactionsread 24 October 2026

2-1 Ресет 🗿

❤1,390😢528😭145💔39🗿37🤮17😨13🕊10

5 Oct 2026, 12:14 UTC≈30,500 views632 reactions1 Starread 24 October 2026
Forwarded from @TSpiritCSPhoto

📼📼📼 TEAM SPIRIT: КТО ИЗ ВАС? 🤔 Сегодня наши парни расскажут интересные факты друг о друге! Кто забиндил декой для tN1R прямо во время турнира? Кто убедительнее всех врёт? Ответы на эти и другие вопросы — в новом видео 👇 ❤️❤️❤️❤️ — титульный партнер Team Spirit. До 10 000 новым пользователям ❤️ 🎞 YouTube

❤521❤‍🔥54🔥39💘5😁4👍3🤩3👎2

4 Oct 2026, 12:03 UTC≈91,100 views2,429 reactions38 Starsread 24 October 2026

2-0 Минус стрик на аншенте 💥

❤1,710😢478😭151❤‍🔥30💘24🕊12🏆8💯6

3 Oct 2026, 15:12 UTC≈42,500 views2,060 reactions6 Starsread 24 October 2026

1-0 Пока разгоняемся 🤫

❤1,760🔥174💯78❤‍🔥19💘11🤡5🥰5🤩3

23 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC≈62,100 views3,878 reactions8 Starsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤2,720🤣891👍125❤‍🔥57😁33🌚16💘11👀10

17 Sept 2026, 14:25 UTC≈47,700 views717 reactions2 Starsread 24 October 2026
Forwarded from @TSpiritCSPhoto

📼📼📼 TEAM SPIRIT: EWC 2026 TEAMSPEAK 💬 А вот и долгожданные тимспики с #EsportsWorldCup! Возвращаемся к турниру, чтобы ещё раз прожить наш путь к победе изнутри команды 👇 🎞 YouTube Монтаж ibuymovie YT: https://www.youtube.com/@ibuymoviecom #EWC26

❤593❤‍🔥52💘39🔥11🤩6🥰5👍4⚡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @tN1Rcs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

SELLTER
@selltertg · 3,218
#1
Coming soon ⌛️
@gun5esports · 59,831
#2
r3salt x payk
@r3saltg · 7,907
#3
FL4MUS
@fl4mus92 · 12,357
#4
harumi
@haruminews · 31,129
#5
Lack1Don
@lack1 · 3,813
#6
KENSi & LIFE
@kensilife · 8,217
#7
m0NESY NEWS
@m0NESYGG · 123,635
#8
FinigaN
@finigannn · 470
#9
Ретейк
@retakenews · 250,631
#10
xiELO-
@x1EL0 · 7,862
#11
kyotostxr
@kyotostxr · 1,972
#12
zoner and CO
@mechanogun · 58,686
#13
ЭРИК СУКА ШОКОВ
@shoke · 94,612
#14
hooch CS2
@hoochcs2 · 23,208
#15
AUNKERE
@aunkeretg · 170,874
#16
seized 🍉
@seizedofficial · 8,086
#17
🥺🤔😏😁
@norwi1 · 1,517
#18
alpha
@alphaddv · 8,106
#19
M0NESY LIFE
@m0NESY13 · 253,256
#20
fostar
@fostarxluv · 6,596
#21
emberJESUS LOUNGE
@emberJESUSofficial · 300
#22
Тетрадка с Фишками CS2
@FISHKACS2 · 27,775
#23
зортик :)
@zortelad · 4,739
#24
Dr.Jerry
@Jerry2strong · 39,550
#25
tried 🤡
@hypetried · 29,505
#26
lollipop21k 🍭
@lollipop21kpage · 6,760
#27
🚹Sdaim
@Sdaimik · 4,417
#28
Бустероид 🥋🥊
@busteroid3000 · 461,855
#29
Sashacheer
@sashacheer · 44,382
#30
shalfey house
@shalfeycsgo · 2,195
#31
Cloud9 Counter-Strike 2
@Cloud9_CS_Official · 4,980
#32
d1Ledez контент из петушков
@d1Ledezlife · 5,183
#33
clax
@justaclaxie · 1,141
#34
BELCHONOKK 🖤
@BELCHONOKKtg · 5,372
#35
Колесница киберспорта | Серега из Авроры
@chariotgo · 2,680
#36
EVELONE 1️⃣9️⃣2️⃣
@evelone192gg · 1,090,441
#37
Кальянная у n0rb3r7’а
@n0rb3r7tg · 9,407
#38
HeavyGoD
@heavygodcs · 5,223
#39
Nafnya
@nafnya · 6,571
#40
Крадиславная
@kradcsgo · 2,165
#41
interz squad
@interzsquad · 3,943
#42
solutioN00
@solutioN00page · 2,413
#43
Sergey "Ax1Le" Rykhtorov
@ax1lecs2 · 7,018
#44
Xant3r page
@Xant3rcs · 1,730
#45
Ликс
@dmlixxx · 361,339
#46
секретный тг шадоукека
@shadowkekw · 598,174
#47
kartash0v
@kartash0v · 4,183
#48
ГЛОШИНГ
@glowiingcs · 1,096
#49
Инсулиновые дебри
@InsilioCS · 10,511
#50
офис hurtslxrd'a
@hurtslxrdsociety · 606
#51
СТАВОЧНАЯ АУНКЕРА 🤑
@aunkereEZ · 91,088
#52
ArtFr0st†
@artfr0st21 · 3,645
#53
SL4M & Counter-Strike
@sl4mtv · 81,096
#54
Мысли F_1N’а
@f_1ncsgo · 7,779
#55
Закулисье CS2
@cs2valve2 · 87,601
#56
mds party
@mdsparty · 1,090
#57
ct0m
@ct0m · 209,657
#58
Aurora CS2
@AuroraTeam · 200,141
#59
CS2NEWS | Counter-Strike 2
@newcsgo · 581,666
#60
deko_O
@dekocsoff · 227,971
#61
OverDrive | 20 ЛЕТ В АРКАДЕ
@ihuntnoobs · 203,651
#62
Подвал CS | Все о ТИР-2 сцене
@tier2cs · 31,124
#63
НАШ КС | CIS NEWS
@cscis · 41,295
#64
CYBERSHOKE Esports | CS2
@team_cybershoke · 17,663
#65
sstiNiX page?
@sstiNiX · 941
#66
ТРУСЫ РАЙЗА
@raiznews · 509,771
#67
Утюг Алмазера
@almazer322 · 6,792
#68
lkb-
@lkb163 · 1,812
#69
handy
@broadcasterhandy · 2,265
#70
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,231,709
#71
CYBERSHOKE
@cybershoke · 232,181
#72
harumijez
@harumijezz · 2,763
#73
Nemiga Gaming
@nemigagg · 18,978
#74
9Pandas CS2
@ninepandascs · 12,309
#75
SlapNews • Новости CS2
@Slap_News · 8,702
#76
donk
@donk1221 · 290,935
#77
sugarcs2
@sugarcs2 · 2
#78
dyyou
@dyy0u · 8,365
#79
РАЙЗ ЛАВ Ю
@raiz · 306,786
#80
Team Spirit CS2
@TSpiritCS · 225,453
#81
Patsi l Путь пацанчика
@patsiuuu · 1,636
#82
dmrr | аналитик BETBOOM TEAM
@dmrranalyst · 4,458
#83
The MongolZ | CS2
@mongolzcs2 · 105,186
#84
DEGSTER
@degsterof · 47,380
#85
Counter-Strike по полочкам
@innersh1necs · 2,527
#86
zweihAHAHA
@zweihaha · 28,250
#87
sh1ro
@sh1rocs2 · 71,756
#88
modjoo
@modjoocs · 1,092
#89
Дневник Симпла
@s1mplegod123 · 243,582
#90
gr1ks
@gr1kscs · 2,950
#91
В сети | Новости CS 2
@csvseti · 9,556
#92
Magnojez
@magnojezking · 3,969
#93
NEWS:GO
@NEWSG0 · 1,735
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Coming soon ⌛️
@gun5esports · 59,831
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
GOGA • WorldEdit
@WorldEditlol · 22,334
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
Dr.Jerry
@Jerry2strong · 39,550
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
tried 🤡
@hypetried · 29,505
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
Nemiga Gaming
@nemigagg · 18,978
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
hooch CS2
@hoochcs2 · 23,208
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
harumi
@haruminews · 31,129
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
GameSport: МИР КИБЕРСПОРТА В CS2
@GameSportNews · 32,848
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
zweihAHAHA
@zweihaha · 28,250
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
CS.MONEY
@csmoney_trade · 77,097
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
PARIVISION
@parivision · 39,560
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
DEGSTER
@degsterof · 47,380
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“tribe by tN1R” (@tN1Rcs), 55,962 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tN1Rcs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.