Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Такора | шаман Бездны ✨

Channel

Такора | шаман Бездны ✨

@takoraway

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,895subscribers

+90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002062057520
TypeChannel
Username@takoraway
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/takoraway

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@takoraway/2188 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC@darkstarroad/31828 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC1.0072 seconds
@darkstarroad/32028 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC@takoraway/2190 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC1.0043 minutes
@takoraway/2192 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC@darkstarroad/32130 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC1.0072 seconds
@takoraway/2195 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC@darkstarroad/32331 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC1.0072 seconds
@takoraway/2204 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC@darkstarroad/3244 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC1.002 minutes
@darkstarroad/3275 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC@takoraway/2206 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC1.003 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@darkstarroad6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (42)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @takoraway — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,8041,9001,8527 August 2026 — 1,805 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,804 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,808 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,811 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,847 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,857 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,854 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,865 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,881 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,887 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,897 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,900 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,894 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,895 subscribers1,8957 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,790–1,914 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:561,895+1
14 Sept 2026, 02:001,894-6
10 Sept 2026, 01:361,900+3
4 Sept 2026, 20:001,897+10
1 Sept 2026, 03:261,887+6
28 Aug 2026, 19:541,881+16
25 Aug 2026, 12:271,865+11
22 Aug 2026, 20:581,854-3
19 Aug 2026, 05:521,857+10
16 Aug 2026, 14:561,847+36
13 Aug 2026, 05:371,811+3
10 Aug 2026, 13:241,808+4
7 Aug 2026, 07:581,804-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:481,805first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

688 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥23734.4%
14420.9%
💔8512.4%
custom 53053803726813418097911.5%
❤‍🔥639.16%
🥰446.40%
👻162.33%
😐91.31%
💯40.581%
20.291%
👍20.291%
💊10.145%
🤝10.145%
🤡10.145%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @takoraway. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTCviews —

Такора | шаман Бездны ✨ pinned «🔥 Ритуал Бунтующего Пламени Групповой онлайн ритуал для погружения в огненные энергии Люцифера. Мы соберемся вместе, в одном ритуальном пространстве, но каждый со своим алтарем. Общее поле усиливает эффект. Мы будем призывать энергии Люцифера в пространство…»

5 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC232 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Ритуал Бунтующего Пламени Групповой онлайн ритуал для погружения в огненные энергии Люцифера. Мы соберемся вместе, в одном ритуальном пространстве, но каждый со своим алтарем. Общее поле усиливает эффект. Мы будем призывать энергии Люцифера в пространство своего алтаря и своей жизни, в свое тело. Будем чиститься ими и наполняться силами. Общаться с Ним, славить и благодарить. Можно если вы новичок. Можно - если

9🔥8custom 53053803726813418094

4 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC309 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁨Читала исследование о том, как психические отклонения влияют на практику. Там написано, что у каждого практикующего человека психика так или иначе повреждена, могут иметься легкие акцентуации (тревожность, мнительность и тд), но при этом это важно отличать от настоящего клинического расстройства, которое может оказывать пагубное действие на практику (к примеру, ОКР, тревожно-депрессивные расстройства, нарциссическое

custom 530538037268134180933🔥10🥰10👻432💯1🤝1

4 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC300 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Записывала для Тиктока, но принесу вам сюда. Важное. Про демонические силы, про богов и мое служение им. Первое предложение в аудио - кликбейт, не обращайте внимания.

🔥20❤‍🔥10👻51custom 53053803726813418091

1 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC433 views108 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ламмас сегодня у меня прошел так…

🔥60🥰2215custom 53053803726813418099👍2

1 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC411 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кто камлал в ночи посреди кукурузного поля - тот я. 😎✨

24🔥10custom 53053803726813418096

1 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC424 views65 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Очень долго моя работа имела чисто мысленный и энергетический характер. Медитации, тексты, пропускание энергий через себя. И как же сейчас приятно заниматься живой ритуальной работой! Вымешивать и печь своей рукой хлеб в подношение духам, нюхать собранную пижму и подсолнухи. Нарезать круги по полям, выбирая самое шикарное для шаманских камланий а потом с разбегу плюхаться в речку с жары. Ни на что это не променяю

42🔥12custom 530538037268134180911

31 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC508 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁨Обязательно ли взаимодействовать с демонами и ангелами через техники и призму ЗМТ?⁩ Нет. Не обязательно. Есть как минимум два подхода: демонолатрический и шаманский. 👉 Шаманский подход: ангелы и демоны воспринимаются как большие темные и большие светлые Духи. Как духи же они и призываются. Метод работы: призыв в состоянии транса, при помощи бубна, варгана, погремушек и других шаманских инструментов. 👉 Демонолатр

🔥30🥰12👻53

31 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC461 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Где и как вам удобнее читать о моих постоянных услугах?

  1. Пост в этом канале с подборкой76%
  2. Отдельный канал с услугами28%
  3. Сайт18%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8

30 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTCviews —

Такора | шаман Бездны ✨ pinned «🔥 Ритуал Ламмаса. Богатство и щедрость земли. Обращение к Маммону. Маммона знают как демона жадности и богатства. Но в прошлых моих к нему обращениях он показал себя не как демон. А как большой дух, который имеет отношение к плодородию и щедрости земли.…»

30 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC538 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Ритуал Ламмаса. Богатство и щедрость земли. Обращение к Маммону. Маммона знают как демона жадности и богатства. Но в прошлых моих к нему обращениях он показал себя не как демон. А как большой дух, который имеет отношение к плодородию и щедрости земли. Он - золотые залежи в недрах гор и тучные стада, стаи рыбы в реке и золотистые колосья. Я хочу вернуть ему этот кусок его силы. Чтобы он вспомнил себя таким. Взамен

28🔥7

29 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC502 views178 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я больше не оправдываю мудаков… Несколько дней думала, рассказать ли эту историю. Расскажу. ‼️ тригер ворнинг: педофелия … … Очень долго я была подписана на одного блогера в жанре “секспросвет”. Образованный человек, сексолог, бдсм-щик, полиамор, суррогатный партнер. Кто понял - тот понял о ком говорю. Я читала этого человека годами. Потому что в его блоге правда были интересные, дельные мысли. Я даже думала, не

💔85🔥50❤‍🔥23😐96💯3💊1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @takoraway. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTCAnonymous Poll101 voters

Где и как вам удобнее читать о моих постоянных услугах?

  1. Пост в этом канале с подборкой76%
  2. Отдельный канал с услугами28%
  3. Сайт18%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Inquizitor Library. Книги по магии и эзотерике.
@Inquizitor_Library · 42,089
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Такора | шаман Бездны ✨” (@takoraway), 1,895 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/takoraway.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.