Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
27,900 average views per post against 8,865 subscribers — an engagement rate of 314.8%. Across the 5,759 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,203–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
20 of 20 published in the window (4 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
558,128
Mature posts only
314.8% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 94 days, net +7,848. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 20:38
8,807
-58
4 Nov 2026, 11:39
8,865
-41
1 Nov 2026, 21:37
8,906
-36
30 Oct 2026, 04:51
8,942
-70
27 Oct 2026, 10:18
9,012
-63
24 Oct 2026, 09:25
9,075
-70
21 Oct 2026, 10:19
9,145
-72
18 Oct 2026, 13:32
9,217
-47
15 Oct 2026, 02:58
9,264
-72
11 Oct 2026, 17:56
9,336
-346
5 Oct 2026, 00:40
9,682
-391
27 Sept 2026, 22:37
10,073
-908
17 Sept 2026, 18:01
10,981
-199
15 Sept 2026, 12:16
11,180
-142
13 Sept 2026, 22:21
11,322
-169
12 Sept 2026, 03:37
11,491
-271
9 Sept 2026, 21:58
11,762
-455
6 Sept 2026, 14:38
12,217
-509
4 Sept 2026, 02:54
12,726
-279
2 Sept 2026, 18:09
13,005
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
304.4%
avg views ÷ 8,807 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,800
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.031%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
59 (29 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
563,032
Reactions total
172
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 23:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
247
Videos
29
Links
335
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
349 reactions across 53 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
208
59.6%
👍
50
14.3%
👏
21
6.02%
🔥
12
3.44%
👌
11
3.15%
🤯
11
3.15%
😢
8
2.29%
🖕
6
1.72%
🤔
5
1.43%
🙏
4
1.15%
👎
3
0.86%
💯
3
0.86%
🤮
3
0.86%
😍
2
0.573%
🤝
1
0.287%
🥱
1
0.287%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
گلدمن ساکس پیشبینی انس طلا را ۵۰۰ دلار کاهش داد🟠
📊بانک گلدمن ساکس پیشبینی قیمت انس طلا برای پایان ۲۰۲۶ را از ۴۶۵۰ به ۴۱۵۰ دلار و برای پایان ۲۰۲۷ از ۵۴۰۰ به ۴۸۰۰ دلار کاهش داد. انس هم در آخرین معاملات روی ۴۰۶۹٫۶۳ دلار بسته شد. یعنی پیشبینی جدید این بانک تنها حدود ۲ درصد بالاتر از قیمت پایانی طلا است.
گلدمن ساکس انتظار دارد نرخ بهره آمریکا دوباره افزایش پیدا کند. این اتفاق به نفع دلار و به ضرر طلا است. گرانی نفت ه…
انس طلا در انتظار انتخابات آمریکا و سرنوشت مذاکرات🟠
📊امروز انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا برگزار میشود. انس طلا طی یک هفته بعد از انتخابات ۲۰۱۴ و ۲۰۱۸ بهترتیب ۰.۶ و ۲.۵ درصد افت کرد، ولی در سال ۲۰۲۲ حدود ۵.۷ درصد رشد داشت. واکنش طلا به نتیجه انتخابات بیشتر به تغییرات دلار، نرخ بهره و سیاستهای اقتصادی آمریکا بستگی دارد.
همزمان، امید به توافق ایران و آمریکا باعث شد نفت برنت روز دوشنبه بیش از ۷ درصد ارزان شود. بااین…
بازگشت انس طلا به ۳۹۰۰ دلار؛ صعود ادامه دارد؟🟠
📊انس طلا امروز به ۳۹۱۴ دلار رسید. افت بیش از ۳ درصدی نفت پس از مذاکرات ایران و آمریکا در دوحه، نگرانیها درباره تورم را کاهش داد و به رشد طلا کمک کرد.
ولی ریزش سهام شرکتهای فناوری باعث شد برخی سرمایهگذاران برای جبران زیان معاملات خود، طلا بفروشند. با وجود بازگشت خریداران، هنوز نمیتوان گفت روند نزولی طلا به پایان رسیده است.
معاملهگران احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره آمریکا …
نتیجه انتخابات آمریکا مسیر انس طلا را تغییر میدهد؟ 🟠
📊انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا سهشنبه ۱۲ آبان برگزار میشود. در این انتخابات، ترکیب جدید کنگره مشخص خواهد شد و نتیجه آن بر انتظارات بازار طلا اثر میگذارد. سرمایهگذاران بیشتر از نتیجه رایگیری، به تغییر سیاستهای اقتصادی، بودجه و تجارت آمریکا توجه دارند.
شورای جهانی طلا میگوید انتخابات بهتنهایی مسیر مشخصی برای قیمت طلا تعیین نمیکند. اگر نتیجه انتخابات نگرانی…
انس طلا در انتظار پنج رویداد مهم هفته 🟠
📊قیمت انس بعد از ریزش شدید روز جمعه به محدوده ۳۸۷۵ دلار رسید. اولین حمایت طلا در محدوده ۳۸۷۰ دلار قرار دارد. اگر قیمت از این سطح پایینتر برود، احتمال افت تا ۳۸۵۰ و سپس ۳۸۰۰ دلار بیشتر میشود. برای شروع روند صعودی هم انس باید ابتدا از مقاومت ۳۹۰۰ دلار و بعد از آن ۳۹۵۰ دلار عبور کند.
این هفته چه رویدادهایی در راه است؟
✅دوشنبه (۱۱ آبان): انتشار آمار فعالیت کارخانههای آمریکا
…
انس طلا زیر فشار تورم و نرخ بهره آمریکا🟠
📊فدرال رزرو آمریکا با رای ۱۰ به ۲، نرخ بهره را بین ۳.۷۵ تا ۴ درصد ثابت نگه داشت. دو عضو با این تصمیم مخالف بودند و خواستار افزایش نرخ بهره شدند. این اختلاف نشان میدهد نگرانی از تورم هنوز جدی است و احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره در دسامبر وجود دارد.
از طرفی گزارش امروز آمریکا نشان داد تورم سالانه به ۳.۶ درصد و تورم هسته به ۳.۱ درصد رسیده است. هر دو عدد بالاتر از هدف ۲ درصدی فدرال رز…
🎙 وبینار «سرمایهگذاری مطمئن در بازار طلا؛ از اصول تا روشها»
طلا یکی از محبوبترین گزینهها برای حفظ ارزش سرمایه است؛ اما هر روش سرمایهگذاری در طلا لزوماً انتخابی مطمئن و سودآور نیست.
در این وبینار با اصول سرمایهگذاری در بازار طلا آشنا میشویم و روشهای مختلف، از طلای فیزیکی تا پلتفرمهای آنلاین و صندوقهای طلا را بررسی و مقایسه میکنیم.
🔹چه عواملی بر قیمت طلا اثر میگذارند؟
🔹چطور ریسک سرمایهگذاری در طلا را کا…
تصمیم سرنوشتساز امشب برای انس طلا 🔹
📊فدرال رزرو امشب ساعت ۲۱:۳۰ درباره نرخ بهره تصمیم میگیرد. انتظار بازار، ثابت ماندن نرخ در محدوده ۳.۷۵ تا ۴ درصد است، ولی صحبتهای رئیس بانک مرکزی درباره نشست دسامبر میتواند مسیر طلا را تغییر دهد.
افزایش قیمت نفت نگرانی از تورم را بیشتر کرده و انس طلا در محدوده ۴۰۳۰ دلار قرار گرفته است. معاملهگران احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره در دسامبر را ۸۴ درصد ارزیابی میکنند. تحلیلهای تکنیکال ه…
انس طلا دوباره زیر ۴۰۰۰ دلار رفت! 🔹
📊انس جهانی طلا امروز به ۳۹۹۸.۱۹۰ دلار رسید و دوباره به زیر ۴۰۰۰ دلار برگشت. دلار آمریکا نزدیک بالاترین قیمت دو هفته اخیر مانده و فشار فروش طلا همچنان ادامه دارد. طلا هفته گذشته حدود ۴ درصد ارزان شد و جمعه تا ۳۹۷۵ دلار پایین آمد که کمترین قیمت آن از ماه ژوئیه بود.
قیمت نفت کاهش پیدا کرد و نگرانی از تورم آمریکا کمتر شد، ولی این اتفاق نتوانست جلوی ریزش طلا را بگیرد. معاملهگران احتم…
انس طلا ۴۰۰۰ دلار را پس گرفت؛ ریزش تمام شده؟🔹
📊انس جهانی طلا بعد از افت حدود ۴ درصدی هفته گذشته، دوباره رشد کرد و به ۴۰۱۴ دلار رسید. کاهش حدود ۲ درصدی نفت برنت به محدوده ۱۱۴ دلار، نگرانی از تورم آمریکا را کمتر کرد. ضعیفشدن دلار هم به رشد طلا کمک کرده است.
بااینحال، خطر ریزش هنوز وجود دارد. احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره در نشست ۶ آبان فدرال رزرو ۱۰ درصد و برای دسامبر حدود ۸۰ درصد برآورد میشود. تنشهای خاورمیانه و احتمال…
اشباع فروش هم انس طلا را نجات نداد! 🔹
📊انس جهانی طلا به زیر ۴۰۰۰ دلار رسید و شاخص RSI آن تا ۲۹.۶ پایین آمد. این یعنی فشار فروش زیاد شده و احتمال دارد قیمت دوباره کمی بالا برود. ولی هنوز نشانه مشخصی از پایان ریزش دیده نمیشود.
کاهش خرید معاملهگران بزرگ، احتمال تقویت دلار و ادامه فروش طلا میتوانند این هفته قیمت را بیشتر پایین ببرند. از هفت گروه شاخص تکنیکال، چهار گروه همچنان روند نزولی را نشان میدهند. تا زمانی که …
❤2🤯2👏1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @talasea_mag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“طلاسی | پلتفرم خرید و فروش آنلاین طلا” (@talasea_mag), 8,807 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talasea_mag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.