Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шалом!️

Channel

Шалом!️

@tapalkycombo

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28,661subscribers

+24,460 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002255688409
TypeChannel
Username@tapalkycombo
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tapalkycombo

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

45.9 average views per post against 36,214 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.127%. Across the 8,451 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,988 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.06% and 21.1%, with a median of 10.4%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (12 August 2026 11 September 2026)
Posts measured16 of 16 published in the window (16 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled734
Mature posts only0.127% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers36,214 measured 9 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,451 channels · p10 2.48% · p25 5.06% · p50 10.4% · p75 21.1% · p90 35.4%
Position in cohort0.331th percentile · 1/83 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 11 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

4,14297,84750,994.57 August 2026 — 4,201 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,201 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,197 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,173 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,164 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,142 subscribers20 August 2026 — 97,847 subscribers21 August 2026 — 97,279 subscribers22 August 2026 — 94,002 subscribers24 August 2026 — 86,270 subscribers25 August 2026 — 86,107 subscribers26 August 2026 — 70,386 subscribers27 August 2026 — 68,104 subscribers28 August 2026 — 67,204 subscribers29 August 2026 — 64,477 subscribers30 August 2026 — 57,750 subscribers31 August 2026 — 45,423 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,106 subscribers2 September 2026 — 43,923 subscribers4 September 2026 — 43,885 subscribers6 September 2026 — 43,156 subscribers9 September 2026 — 36,214 subscribers12 September 2026 — 32,395 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,296 subscribers15 September 2026 — 28,661 subscribers28,6617 August 202615 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 39 days, net +24,460. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 08:4028,661-635
13 Sept 2026, 16:4029,296-3,099
12 Sept 2026, 01:0032,395-3,819
9 Sept 2026, 16:3936,214-6,942
6 Sept 2026, 05:3843,156-729
4 Sept 2026, 00:5743,885-38
2 Sept 2026, 12:5343,923-183
1 Sept 2026, 15:1344,106-1,317
31 Aug 2026, 13:2845,423-12,327
30 Aug 2026, 10:5757,750-6,727
29 Aug 2026, 09:4764,477-2,727
28 Aug 2026, 10:2467,204-900
27 Aug 2026, 09:2768,104-2,282
26 Aug 2026, 07:1670,386-15,721
25 Aug 2026, 04:3986,107-163
24 Aug 2026, 05:0986,270-7,732
22 Aug 2026, 10:0594,002-3,277
21 Aug 2026, 02:4397,279-568
20 Aug 2026, 04:4897,847+93,705
17 Aug 2026, 11:384,142first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.16%
avg views ÷ 28,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
45.9
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.667%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held36 (25 June 20267 September 2026)
Views total734
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC18 viewsread 10 September 2026

🦄 Я завел монстрика с уникальным характером и внешностью! Он общается со мной и майнит $LUMIS (и да, это имеет реальную ценность). 🥚 Дарю бесплатное Древнее яйцо первым, кто перейдет по моей ссылке. Поспеши забрать и вырастить его! Будет весело 👇 https://t.me/monsterland_bot?start=ref_RRLDkG4 Музрнчик пиятный.. Яйца надо?

6 Sept 2026, 18:16 UTC19 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

https://t.me/AbraVpnBot?start=ref--tL11PzERZeM0inAw Это моя реферальная ссылка на хороший ВПН, которым сама пользуюсь.

6 Sept 2026, 18:14 UTC17 viewsread 10 September 2026

https://t.me/AbraVpnBot?start=ref--tL11PzERZeM0inAw Это моя реферальная ссылка на хороший ВПН, которым сама пользуюсь.

4 Sept 2026, 16:18 UTC28 viewsread 10 September 2026

Игра с эльфами t.me/fomo_fighters_game_bot/game?startapp=s2_ref586e44bcde0c6efae6f63858e0a07cb2 🔥Играй со мной, строй свой замок и зарабатывай. 💸 Получи большой бонус по ссылке.

3 Sept 2026, 19:43 UTC27 viewsread 10 September 2026
Video

Привет, дружище! Посмотри на @Bums! Присоединяйся сейчас и поднимись с уровня бомжа до короля улиц!

1 Sept 2026, 15:14 UTC30 viewsread 10 September 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/XkauqcuPWCs?si=716duT5Eu3Txvjmh

1 Sept 2026, 09:44 UTC37 viewsread 10 September 2026

t.me/fomo_fighters_game_bot/game?startapp=s2_ref586e44bcde0c6efae6f63858e0a07cb2 🔥Играй со мной, строь свой замок и зарабатывай. 💸 Получи большой бонус по ссылке.

29 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC37 viewsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @dnevnikaktivov

Одна коррекция - два совершенно разных вывода Коррекция удивительным образом подтверждает каждому участнику рынка именно то, во что он уже хотел верить. Человек без позиции смотрит на падающие цены и испытывает облегчение: значит, я всё сделал правильно, что не покупал. Долгосрочник смотрит на то же движение и задаёт другой вопрос: если инвестиционная идея сохранилась, могу ли я использовать эти цены, чтобы улучшить

28 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC37 viewsread 10 September 2026

https://t.me/ATF_AIRDROP_bot?start=941567078 Майнит даже в офлайне

24 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC53 viewsread 10 September 2026

Прошу общаться без мата и любого сквернословия.

21 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC61 viewsread 10 September 2026

t.me/fomo_fighters_bot/game?startapp=ref6964f30c2676d9dba558ca907b1538b0 🔥Играй со мной, строй свой замок и зарабатывай. 💸 Получи большой бонус по ссылке.

20 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC57 viewsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @TD3108Photo

Путин подписал закон о регулировании криптовалют в РФ. Ссылка на закон

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @tapalkycombo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шалом!️” (@tapalkycombo), 28,661 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tapalkycombo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.