Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Друзья Tyler Durden

Channel

Друзья Tyler Durden

@TD3108

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

25,747subscribers

+21,335 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004299305238
TypeChannel
Username@TD3108
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TD3108

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

63.6 average views per post against 30,851 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.206%. Across the 23,718 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.44% and 21.5%, with a median of 11.0%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (12 August 2026 11 September 2026)
Posts measured56 of 56 published in the window (56 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,564
Mature posts only0.212% over 54 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers30,851 measured 9 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,718 channels · p10 2.79% · p25 5.44% · p50 11.0% · p75 21.5% · p90 38.5%
Position in cohort0.531th percentile · 1/53 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.094% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 11 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

3,81578,89041,352.57 August 2026 — 4,412 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,384 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,150 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,971 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,815 subscribers20 August 2026 — 78,890 subscribers21 August 2026 — 77,881 subscribers22 August 2026 — 68,204 subscribers24 August 2026 — 67,431 subscribers25 August 2026 — 65,004 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,480 subscribers27 August 2026 — 57,732 subscribers28 August 2026 — 57,367 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,783 subscribers30 August 2026 — 48,537 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,591 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,053 subscribers2 September 2026 — 33,008 subscribers4 September 2026 — 32,999 subscribers6 September 2026 — 31,754 subscribers9 September 2026 — 30,851 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,083 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,681 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,747 subscribers25,7477 August 202615 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 39 days, net +21,335. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 08:1625,747-3,934
13 Sept 2026, 16:2129,681-402
12 Sept 2026, 01:0130,083-768
9 Sept 2026, 19:1830,851-903
6 Sept 2026, 13:4131,754-1,245
4 Sept 2026, 01:1932,999-9
2 Sept 2026, 17:5733,008-45
1 Sept 2026, 14:1233,053-538
31 Aug 2026, 15:2433,591-14,946
30 Aug 2026, 18:4548,537-246
29 Aug 2026, 18:5448,783-8,584
28 Aug 2026, 19:2457,367-365
27 Aug 2026, 16:0957,732-2,748
26 Aug 2026, 17:5360,480-4,524
25 Aug 2026, 14:1865,004-2,427
24 Aug 2026, 16:0367,431-773
22 Aug 2026, 23:0968,204-9,677
21 Aug 2026, 11:5877,881-1,009
20 Aug 2026, 09:4778,890+75,075
17 Aug 2026, 12:553,815first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.217%
avg views ÷ 25,747 subscribers
Avg views / post
55.9
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held78 (31 July 20267 September 2026)
Views total2,461
Reactions total431
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 13:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

756 reactions across 78 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍22229.4%
🔥16321.6%
15620.6%
😁486.35%
💯476.22%
👏263.44%
❤‍🔥212.78%
🥰151.98%
🏆91.19%
👀91.19%
👌70.926%
😱70.926%
🐳50.661%
🤯50.661%
🕊40.529%
🤩40.529%
30.397%
🤔20.265%
🤣20.265%
😎10.132%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 756 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,076
across the posts below
Posts paid on
47
of 78 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
1,000
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TD3108. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🔴 У каждого криптопроекта своя дорожная карта. Harmony спустя 7 лет сворачивает свою сеть, переносит ONE в Ethereum и уходит в AI-видео. Router Protocol закрывается 30 сентября, сжигает 303 млн ROUTE и начинает делистинг с бирж. А когда-то всё начиналось одинаково: Экосистема. Децентрализация. Масштабирование. Будущее финансов. Теперь дорожная карта стала короче: Harmony → AI. Router → выход. Холдер → держать мешо

3

6 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC19 views10 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

📣Реальность жизни В телефоне может быть тысяча контактов. Но если ночью случится настоящая проблема, список внезапно сокращается до нескольких человек. Вот именно это число и стоит считать настоящим количеством контактов. - - - - - - - #TylerDurden

💯62🔥2

6 Sept 2026, 04:55 UTC25 views10 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

📣Воскресенье. Сегодня официально разрешается ничего не достигать, никуда не развиваться, не становиться лучшей версией себя. Можно просто поесть, полежать и посмотреть в потолок. Мир как-нибудь переживёт этот день без нашего успеха. 😂 - - - - - - #TylerDurden

👍7🔥21

5 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC29 views10 reactions3 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🧪 ATF. Кажется, эксперимент немного охренел. 😂 Заходил примерно на $60 — чисто посмотреть, что за зверь. Сегодня: 💰 86 060 ATF 📈 +111,6% ⛏ фарм работает ✅ выплаты приходят Я ничего не докупаю. Никуда не бегу. Просто жду 100 000 ATF. А дальше у меня два сценария. ATF вырастет — буду рассказывать всем, что это был холодный расчёт и фундаментальный анализ. 😎 ATF рухнет — скажу, что это был социальный эксперимент. 😂 У

👍5💯2🔥2😁1

4 Sept 2026, 16:05 UTC31 views10 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

🧪 Эксперимент одного поста. День 25. На 25-й день эксперимент наконец дал результат! Мы научились делать вид, что всё идёт по плану. Осталось узнать план. 😂 - - - - - - - - #TylerDurden @monk

👍5🔥3😁2

4 Sept 2026, 12:09 UTC30 views7 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

🗿 Мысли вслух Иногда ничего не происходит. Никаких побед. Никаких катастроф. Никаких великих перемен. Просто обычный день. Но мы почему-то разучились считать это хорошей новостью. - - - - - - - #TylerDurden

5💯2

4 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC28 views7 reactions51 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

👀 Еще о канале У нашего канала сейчас идеальная аудитория 👍 Никто не спорит. Никто не ругается. Никто ничего не требует. Иногда даже кажется, что никого нет. Гармония достигнута. 😂 - - - - - - #TylerDurden

😁5🔥2

3 Sept 2026, 03:05 UTC43 views12 reactions10 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

💖 Наблюдение У канала есть суперспособность. Он умеет оживлять людей только одним словом «розыгрыш». До этого в основном все героически лежат без признаков жизни. 😂 - - - - - - - - #TylerDurden

😁6👍5🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 18:02 UTC43 views11 reactions17 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Иногда вечером ловишь себя на простой мысли. Весь день куда-то спешил, что-то решал, кому-то отвечал, о чём-то переживал. Потом сел, налил чай и думаешь, а нахрена я вообще так нервничал? 😏 Завтра половина сегодняшних проблем уже никому не будет нужна. Так что на сегодня хватит. 😁 Спокойного вечера и ночи! - - - - - - - #TylerDurden

👌53👍2🥰1

2 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC40 views10 reactions26 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🧪 Эксперимент ATF продолжается. Последние дни картина стала заметно жёстче. Цена просела, продажи усилились, а намайненные ATF продолжают выходить на рынок. Главная проблема сейчас , это тонкая ликвидность и проскальзывание. Большой объём невозможно продать по цене на экране. Чем больше продажа, тем сильнее продавец сам роняет курс. Но именно поэтому эксперимент становится интереснее. Я ничего не докупаю и не выхожу

🔥53👀2

1 Sept 2026, 17:16 UTC38 views9 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🏆 Чемпионы начали сливать награды. Вот это я понимаю спортивный дух. 😂 Выиграл кубок. Получил уникальный подарок. Почувствовал себя частью истории и сразу выставил на продажу. Причём один дешевле другого. Чемпионский характер это хорошо, но когда рядом кнопка «Продать», характер начинает немного барахлить. 😏 Теперь ждём следующий этап соревнований, кто быстрее укатает цену собственной награды в пол. Вот там действи

🔥5👍31

1 Sept 2026, 10:57 UTC37 views11 reactions3 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🥚 Tyler Durden vs Система Когда вокруг хаос, не ищи спасителя. Стань тем, за кем пойдут другие. - - - - - - #TylerDurden

👍73🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @TD3108. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@TD3108 edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Друзья Tyler Durden” (@TD3108), 25,747 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TD3108.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.