Channel
@tarbi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,230subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001052275652 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tarbi |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tarbi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:25 | 8,230 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 8,236 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 8,229 | +15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 8,214 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 8,211 | +19 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 8,192 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 8,196 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 8,199 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 8,202 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 8,210 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 8,210 | first reading |
75 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (29 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,845 |
| Reactions total | 93 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109 reactions across 43 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 84.4% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 10.1% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.83% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.83% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 اگه دانشجویی، این فولدر رو نبینـی ضرر کردی! 😍 📚 صدها فایل و منبع کاربردی در یک جا: 🧠 روانشناسی 🇬🇧 زبان انگلیسی 📖 مقاله و جزوه 🎬 فیلم آموزشی 📝 منابع کنکوری 💼 فرصتهای شغلی 🍀ادبیات و مطالب ادبی دیگه لازم نیست برای پیدا کردن هر فایل، ساعتها توی تلگرام بگردی! 🔥 📌 فولدر رو به تلگرامت اضافه کن و هر وقت لازم داشتی ازش استفاده کن: 👇👇 https://t.me/addlist/Si6g_cYXB880M2Jk ⚡️ فقط روی لینک بزن و ADD رو بزن! 🌱…
📱 یک اشتباه رایج درباره فضای مجازی مشکل فقط این نیست که کودک چند ساعت آنلاین است؛ مهمتر این است که آن زمان چه چیزی را میبیند و چه چیزهایی را از زندگی واقعی کنار میزند. اگر فضای مجازی جای خواب، فعالیت بدنی، بازی، ارتباط خانوادگی یا دوستی واقعی را بگیرد، احتمال آسیب بیشتر میشود. آکادمی اطفال آمریکا نیز در توصیههای جدید بر محتوا، کیفیت تجربه، خواب، ارتباط خانوادگی و تعادل فعالیتهای آنلاین و آفلاین تأکید دارد، نه…
🎯 «توجه مثبت» را با تشویقِ توخالی اشتباه نگیریم بهجای اینکه مرتب به کودک بگوییم: ❌ «آفرین، تو خیلی خوبی!» رفتار مشخصش را ببینیم: ✅ «دیدم وقتی دوستت ناراحت شد، رفتی کنارش.» ✅ «متوجه شدم خودت وسایلت رو جمع کردی.» پژوهشهای جدید نشان میدهند والدگری مثبت و رابطه نزدیک والد–کودک با تنظیم هیجان بهتر و رفتارهای مشکلزای کمتر در کودکان ارتباط دارد. 🔑 کودک وقتی دقیقاً میفهمد چه رفتاری ارزشمند بوده، بهتر میتواند همان…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎯 «توجه مثبت» را با تشویقِ توخالی اشتباه نگیریم بهجای اینکه مرتب به کودک بگوییم: ❌ «آفرین، تو خیلی خوبی!» رفتار مشخصش را ببینیم: ✅ «دیدم وقتی دوستت ناراحت شد، رفتی کنارش.» ✅ «متوجه شدم خودت وسایلت رو جمع کردی.» پژوهشهای جدید نشان میدهند والدگری مثبت و رابطه نزدیک والد–کودک با تنظیم هیجان بهتر و رفتارهای مشکلزای کمتر در کودکان ارتباط دارد. 🔑 کودک وقتی دقیقاً میفهمد چه رفتاری ارزشمند بوده، بهتر میتواند همان رفتا…
❤1
🚨 چرا بعضی بچهها بیشتر دروغ میگویند؟ گاهی مشکل از «دروغگو بودن کودک» نیست؛ از واکنش ما به حقیقت است. ۳ رفتار والدین که میتواند کودک را به سمت پنهانکاری ببرد: ❌ ترساندن از تنبیه: وقتی کودک مطمئن باشد با گفتن حقیقت تنبیه میشود، ممکن است دروغ را راهی برای فرار بداند. ❌ تحقیر و برچسب زدن: جملههایی مثل «تو دروغگویی» کودک را به جای اصلاح رفتار، درگیر تصویری منفی از خودش میکند. ❌ بازجویی و فشار زیاد: گاهی کودک از …
گاهی یک جمله ساده میتواند سالها در ذهن کودک بماند... ❌ «تو هیچوقت درست کاری نمیکنی!» ❌ «ازت ناامیدم!» ❌ «ببین بچههای دیگه چقدر بهتر از تو هستن!» این جملهها شاید در لحظه باعث توقف رفتار کودک شوند، اما میتوانند به اعتمادبهنفس او آسیب بزنند. 🌱 کودک به جای مقایسه و تحقیر، به فرصتِ یادگیری و احساس امنیت نیاز دارد. اگر این نکته برایت مفید بود، برای یک پدر یا مادر دیگر هم بفرست. ❤️ برای نکات کاربردی تربیت فرزند، پیج…
🧠 کودک همیشه با حرف شما آرام نمیشود؛ با «الگوی آرامش شما» یاد میگیرد. پژوهشهای جدید ۲۰۲۶ نشان میدهند تنظیم هیجان کودک با فرایندهای تنظیم هیجان والدین ارتباط دارد؛ یعنی کودک فقط از توصیههای ما یاد نمیگیرد، بلکه نحوه برخورد ما با استرس و عصبانیت را هم مشاهده و تجربه میکند. پس وقتی عصبانی هستید، بهجای اینکه فقط تلاش کنید عصبانیتتان را پنهان کنید، گاهی با صدای آرام بگویید: «الان عصبانیام؛ چند نفس میکشم تا آروم…
🧠 «برعکس نوشتن» همیشه نشانه اختلال یادگیری نیست! اگر کودک در سالهای ابتدایی مدرسه بعضی حروف یا اعداد را برعکس مینویسد، بهتنهایی نمیتوان آن را نشانه دیسلکسیا دانست. نگرانی زمانی جدیتر میشود که مشکل در خواندن، هجیکردن و تشخیص دقیق کلمات پایدار باشد و با وجود آموزش مناسب ادامه پیدا کند. دیسلکسیا با هوش پایین یکی نیست و با حمایت آموزشی مناسب میتوان مهارتهای خواندن را بهبود داد. 🌱 قبل از برچسب زدن، الگوی مشکل را …
اختلالات یادگیری 📚 کودکی که در خواندن مشکل دارد، لزوماً کمهوش نیست. اگر کودکی با وجود آموزش مناسب، برای مدت قابلتوجهی در خواندن دقیق، روانخوانی یا درک کلمات مشکل دارد، نباید فوراً او را «تنبل» یا «کمهوش» بدانیم. یکی از احتمالها میتواند اختلال یادگیری خواندن (دیسلکسیا) باشد؛ اختلالی که با هوش پایین یکی نیست و نیاز به ارزیابی تخصصی دارد. 🔹 به جای مقایسه با همکلاسیها بگوییم: «بیا ببینیم کدام روش یادگیری برای…
🧠 «کودک چرا وسط کار رهایش میکند؟» گاهی کودک تکلیف، بازی یا کاری را شروع میکند اما خیلی زود رهایش میکند. این رفتار همیشه نشانه تنبلی یا بیعلاقگی نیست؛ ممکن است به مهارتهای اجرایی مثل حفظ هدف، کنترل حواسپرتی و ادامهدادن کار مربوط باشد. این مهارتها در کودکی و نوجوانی هنوز در حال رشدند. 🔹 به جای اینکه بگوییم: ❌ «تو هیچوقت کارت رو کامل نمیکنی!» بگوییم: ✅ «بیا کار رو به دو قسمت تقسیم کنیم؛ اول این قسمت رو تموم…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @tarbi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 637,312 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tarbi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تربیت فرزند” (@tarbi), 8,230 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarbi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.