Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дарья Насонова

Channel

Дарья Насонова

@taumos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,534subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001138288960
TypeChannel
Username@taumos
Created30 June 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/taumos

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,5346,5746,5546 August 2026 — 6,564 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,568 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,570 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,569 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,556 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,547 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,550 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,574 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,569 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,542 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,537 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,534 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,528–6,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 13:576,534-3
8 Sept 2026, 04:176,537-5
2 Sept 2026, 22:166,542-27
30 Aug 2026, 23:026,569-5
25 Aug 2026, 03:486,574+24
21 Aug 2026, 11:186,550+3
18 Aug 2026, 10:436,547-9
15 Aug 2026, 13:536,556-13
12 Aug 2026, 10:156,569-1
9 Aug 2026, 20:356,570+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:306,568+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:346,564first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,720 reactions across 33 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
57633.5%
custom 547423768623345137621312.4%
🔥1347.79%
🤡1166.74%
💯1056.10%
😁1056.10%
👍1015.87%
custom 5424837444841260388995.76%
🍓301.74%
custom 6188011317538851461241.40%
custom 5861886341855316756211.22%
🗿201.16%
🤯201.16%
🙏170.988%
❤‍🔥160.93%
💔150.872%
😡140.814%
🤣140.814%
🙈100.581%
👎70.407%
19 further kinds633.66%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,009 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 38 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @taumos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC747 views64 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Все, персона официально в отпуске.

🍓30🔥199❤‍🔥4👍2

11 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,370 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Это неплохо.

👍82🤡2🤝1🥴1

11 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,310 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lyudmil_ogurchenkoPhoto

Теперь наш официальный мерч, созданный совместно с BOOOMERANGS, можно приобрести тут

8👍2

10 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,710 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostorozhno_moskvaVideo

Верховный суд снял партию «Яблоко» с выборов. Судья пробыл в совещательной комнате почти час, само заседание длилось около девяти часов. Истцом выступила партия «Родина», которая обвинила «Яблоко» в нарушении авторских прав, в том числе в агитационных материалах. В ходе заседания прокурор поддержал иск. После оглашения решения сторонники «Яблока» у здания суда начали скандировать: «Позор!» Из-за блокировок мы в MA

🤡42😡14🎉4🏆1🤣1

10 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,980 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А почему моя бывшая блять коллега, А НЕ Я.

custom 586188634185531675618😁3

10 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,730 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @krylikryliVideo

Loc - Dog, Крыли — Отвечаю 21.08 Как вам?😎 За самый ✨креативный✨комментарий подарю два билета на сольник!!!

🙈10🔥5👎2🤩1🤮1

9 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC≈2,050 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @white_squawPhoto

Дочитала. Абсолютный балдеж.

28🤡2

9 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC≈2,170 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вкусно пахну ;)

🔥27custom 547423768623345137618😁4🤡2👍1

9 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈2,140 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я объелась, любимые подписчики.

35custom 54248374448412603888custom 61880113175388514614🥰1

8 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈2,400 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я сошла с ума. https://t.me/listva_books_msk/17847

😁2111🤡2🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 02:42 UTC≈2,420 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мы почти всегда всё понимаем сразу. Но не всегда сразу хотим верить в то, что поняли.

25💔15🔥3💯1🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC≈2,450 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Щас бы бутер с маслом на белом хлебе в натуре.

32❤‍🔥6🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @taumos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Русская барыня
@russkaya_barynya · 43,270
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
Караван Ахуительных Историй
@karavanahuitelnyhistoriy · 48,915
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
КРАСОТА ТРЕБУЕТ КЭШ
@beautycash · 57,038
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Лиза Лазерсон
@znachit_net · 30,077
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
ХАЙЛАЙТЕР
@goshakartsevcalling · 40,244
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
Дача | Строительство | Интерьер
@vseprosto_dacha · 30,278
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 7 September 2026
БОГЕМА ПИТЕРСКАЯ (светский вестник Москвы)
@bogemasranaya · 30,779
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
Скромное Обаяние Пацана
@kukan_sportif · 38,212
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Русский шаффл
@rushuffle · 44,134
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
НЕПРОЗАМУЖ
@mortalbeauty · 46,614
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Мужчина, вы куда?
@crisisman · 44,643
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
КАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,533
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
Медиавойны
@mediavoyni · 39,438
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
Не туда
@netudasmm · 41,501
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дарья Насонова” (@taumos), 6,534 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taumos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.