Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TechRocks

Channel

TechRocks

@techrocks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,984subscribers

-59 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001120614562
TypeChannel
Username@techrocks
DescriptionОфициальный телеграм-канал сайта techrocks.ru По вопросам рекламы: @aldrson РКН: https://clck.ru/3R3tTP
Created11 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/techrocks

Growth

12,98413,04313,013.56 August 2026 — 13,043 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,043 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,040 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,034 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,033 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,029 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,025 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,022 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,017 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,014 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,001 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,998 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,993 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,990 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,984 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,975–13,052 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 23:3812,984-6
20 Aug 2026, 18:3512,990-3
18 Aug 2026, 14:3312,993-5
17 Aug 2026, 11:2312,998-3
16 Aug 2026, 02:0413,001-13
14 Aug 2026, 14:2813,014-3
13 Aug 2026, 05:3313,017-5
12 Aug 2026, 07:5713,022-3
11 Aug 2026, 07:1813,025-4
10 Aug 2026, 05:1513,029-4
9 Aug 2026, 05:0713,033-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:1713,034-6
7 Aug 2026, 02:0013,040-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:3213,043no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:2513,043first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.14%
avg views ÷ 12,984 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.458%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held25 (26 May 202616 August 2026)
Views total6,338
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
769
Videos
15
Links
2,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4851.1%
1010.6%
👍99.57%
🔥66.38%
💯55.32%
🤔44.26%
🤣44.26%
🙏33.19%
👏11.06%
💩11.06%
😢11.06%
🤡11.06%
🤪11.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.00%
1 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,460
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,530
over 24 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJJ3D6q116 June 202616 June 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 16 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC626 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

ThingsProgrammesDO Сообщество айтишников похоже на отдельную нацию со своей культурой и конечно же юмором. Не каждый может понять их необычный юмор. Но те, кто смогут — имеют предрасположенность к изучению языков программирования. Проверить это поможет ThingsProgrammesDO. Залетай на канал. Как минимум, хорошо проведешь время, как максимум — это может стать первым шагом ко входу в айти. // ThingsProgrammesDO

👏1🤪1

14 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC774 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

👀 Лучшие CLI-инструменты для разработчиков Терминал давно перестал быть просто черным окном с командами. Современные CLI-инструменты помогают быстрее искать файлы, анализировать данные и автоматизировать рутинные задачи. ⚙️ eza Современная замена классическому ls. Показывает файлы более наглядно, умеет отображать дерево каталогов, права доступа и информацию из Git. ⚙️ bat Улучшенная версия cat с подсветкой синт

1

14 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC758 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня ИТ — это уже не отдельные технологии, а связанные между собой процессы. Поэтому и обсуждать их по отдельности становится все сложнее Изменения в корпоративных ИТ принесли новые инженерные вызовы — от миграции с зарубежных решений до обеспечения устойчивости и безопасности инфраструктуры. Именно этим вопросам посвящена IT Elements — конференция для архитекторов, инженеров, SRE, спецов по ИБ, инфраструктурщико

👍2🤔21

14 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,260 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Фронтендеры: Это ошибки бэкенда. Бэкендеры: На нашей стороне нет ошибок, ищите у себя. Тем временем где-то в серверной:

😁4🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,210 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🟢 Операторы в Python 1️⃣ Приоритет операторов Python. Статья в популярной форме, на простых примерах поясняет разницу в приоритетах операторов and и or. 2️⃣ Моржовый оператор в Python. После добавления этого оператора в обычно спокойном мире Python возникли споры, и его использование до сих пор относительно ограничено. Тем не менее, выражение присваивания теперь является частью Python, и оно может быть полезным в н

1

27 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,710 views15 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁11🤣4

20 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,840 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

📊 Инструменты для анализа логов и мониторинга Когда что-то ломается в продакшене, именно логи и мониторинг помогают понять, что произошло. Эти инструменты значительно упрощают поиск проблем и расследование инцидентов. 🔍 Grafana Одна из самых популярных платформ для визуализации метрик. Позволяет собирать данные из разных источников и строить удобные дашборды. 🔍 Prometheus Стандарт де-факто для сбора и хранения м

👍1

16 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Подборка книг по Go на русском языке. Скачивайте и читайте. Программирование на языке Go Автор: Саммерфильд Марк Go. Рецепты программирования Автор: Аарон Торрес Black Hat Go Автор: Том Стил Linux: эффективная многопроцессорность Используем Go Автор: Олег Цилюрик Облачный Go Автор: Титмус М. А. Практический Go Автор: Амит Саха Golang для профи Автор: Михалис Цукалос

16 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,390 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Оффер редко приходит сам. Обычно между «без работы» и «оффер получен» стоят десятки откликов, доработок резюме и часов поиска. Talanto.work помогает пройти этот путь быстрее: 🟠 50 000+ IT-вакансий с разных сайтов 🟠 Telegram-бот с уведомлениями по вашим фильтрам 🟠 Проверка резюме и рекомендации по улучшению 🟠 Проверка соответствия резюме конкретной вакансии 🟠 Генератор персональных сопроводительных писем Ищите р

👍1💩1

1 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 22 August 2026
Poll

А сколько вы проработали на своей первой (программистской) работе?

  1. Еще нисколько20%
  2. До года19%
  3. Год8%
  4. До двух лет9%
  5. Два года7%
  6. Больше 2 лет9%
  7. 3-5 лет15%
  8. Больше 5 лет12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jun 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,940 views0 reactionsread 22 August 2026

@rabotadlaqa - чат для поиска работы тестировщиков. HR менеджеры - welcome

25 Jun 2026, 13:58 UTC≈1,930 views10 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁8🔥1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @techrocks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTCAnonymous Poll287 voters

А сколько вы проработали на своей первой (программистской) работе?

  1. Еще нисколько20%
  2. До года19%
  3. Год8%
  4. До двух лет9%
  5. Два года7%
  6. Больше 2 лет9%
  7. 3-5 лет15%
  8. Больше 5 лет12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jun 2026, 06:44 UTCAnonymous Poll103 voters

А давайте обсудим подработки. Вы как? Подрабатываете?

  1. Нет, мне хватает и занятости по работе, и денег60%
  2. Да, та же разработка, только на фрилансе17%
  3. Да, менторством5%
  4. Да, создаю контент для программистов (курсы, видео) и монетизирую его2%
  5. Да, но моя подработка вообще не связана с программированием16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2026, 06:46 UTCAnonymous Poll169 voters

На каком этапе вы сейчас находитесь?

  1. Школьник, студент - изучаю программирование8%
  2. Переквалифицируюсь на программирование4%
  3. Работаю 0-1 год1%
  4. Работаю 1-3 года8%
  5. Работаю больше 3 лет61%
  6. Я не по программированию (сисадмин, тестировщик и т.д.), но интересуюсь19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2026, 06:45 UTCAnonymous Poll94 voters

А как вы относитесь к тестовым? Это лучше, чем решение задач на доске/онлайн, или хуже?

  1. Лучше возьмусь за тестовое60%
  2. Лучше задачу решу40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,476,015 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Взгляд изнутри на IT
@iznytri · 80,698
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TechRocks” (@techrocks), 12,984 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techrocks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.