Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Помогите, телемедицина 🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤444444444444444444

Channel

Помогите, телемедицина 🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤444444444444444444

@teles0s

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,265subscribers

+179 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001087609670
TypeChannel
Username@teles0s
Created28 April 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/teles0s

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,06714,26514,1666 August 2026 — 14,086 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,086 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,085 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,080 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,076 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,073 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,067 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,113 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,119 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,117 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,114 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,110 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,107 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,106 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,127 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,197 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,190 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,176 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,165 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,155 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,163 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,160 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,161 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,169 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,161 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,158 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,153 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,157 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,262 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,265 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 35 days, net +179. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,037–14,295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 08:3514,265+3
7 Sept 2026, 00:2014,262+105
4 Sept 2026, 06:4114,157+4
2 Sept 2026, 21:4514,153-5
1 Sept 2026, 21:1514,158-3
31 Aug 2026, 23:1814,161-8
30 Aug 2026, 20:2514,169+8
28 Aug 2026, 17:4414,161+1
27 Aug 2026, 20:3714,160-3
26 Aug 2026, 17:3914,163+8
25 Aug 2026, 15:4814,155-10
24 Aug 2026, 15:1414,165-11
23 Aug 2026, 00:2814,176-14
21 Aug 2026, 17:2714,190-7
20 Aug 2026, 17:1414,197+70
19 Aug 2026, 16:0414,127+21
18 Aug 2026, 12:3714,106-1
17 Aug 2026, 10:2414,107-3
15 Aug 2026, 20:2714,110-4
14 Aug 2026, 13:0814,114first reading

Engagement

684 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.33%
avg views ÷ 14,265 subscribers
Avg views / post
618
529 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
531
of 684 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 498 of 529 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held684 (5 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total326,880
Reactions total6,481
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 29m
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 159 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,044 reactions across 623 posts, in 70 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,78419.7%
1,18413.1%
💯1,01211.2%
🤣5415.98%
🔥3794.19%
🥰3473.84%
👍3143.47%
🍌2032.24%
🫡1982.19%
👏1651.82%
🎉1581.75%
🌚1531.69%
🤡1521.68%
😭1481.64%
😢1461.61%
🤮1321.46%
👌1241.37%
🤔1231.36%
🤝1111.23%
1061.17%
50 further kinds1,56417.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 646 of the 684 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,364 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 684 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:10 UTC232 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁42🗿1

2 Sept 2026, 18:02 UTC260 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

6🤡3👍2🔥1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 684 posts we hold for @teles0s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTCAnonymous Poll168 voters

Что вам больше всего нравилось делать в школе

  1. Изучать глубины своего сознания в туалете на перемене27%
  2. Травить омег13%
  3. Удивлять училок интеллектом (цитирование ницше, быстрые факты, "топ 5 самых больших рыб" и т.п.)38%
  4. Объяснять историку почему коммунизм/анархизм/фашизм топ идеология, как быть вне системы (по шевцову)14%
  5. Кидаться едой в столовке «Спасибо нашим поварам, варили свиньям - дали нам!»9%
  6. Играть в вышибалы/баскетбол/футбол и потом в раздевалке сравнивать себя с Роналдо9%
  7. Демонстративно быть нетакусей: читать книги в коридоре, фыркать когда все смеются с "пошлятины"36%
  8. Срывать уроки, троллить училок, угорать с кентами30%

The shares total 176%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 684 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Немедицина
@ybody · 40,894
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 29 August 2026
Патология 💉🩸
@PATologiamedic · 29,532
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Помогите, телемедицина 🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤🐤444444444444444444” (@teles0s), 14,265 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teles0s.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.