2 measurements taken within a single day, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51–58 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Oct 2026, 13:48
57
+5
29 Oct 2026, 10:22
52
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 6 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
197.2%
avg views ÷ 57 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026
Posts held
16 (6 October 2026 – 29 October 2026)
Views total
1,461
Reactions total
165
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
165 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
76
46.1%
👍
28
17.0%
🔥
24
14.5%
custom 5312194531569993868
18
10.9%
💘
7
4.24%
😢
5
3.03%
custom 5312218561912014938
3
1.82%
👏
2
1.21%
😍
2
1.21%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 13 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ternoved. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 October 2026 to 29 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вчера был очень плотный по заказам день, я отдала 12 посылок. Обычно у меня есть небольшой запас в наличии, но иногда приходится экстренно дошивать вам вещички. Пошив в потоке мне не в тягость: последние годы я работала на швейных производствах, где дни, когда нужно было сделать 20 пар джинсов или 5 классических пиджаков, это был не подвиг, а стандартный рабочий день. 😺
Сейчас я планирую дальше выпускать свои задумк…
Увидела шарфик на пинтересте, решила повторить. На референсе дополнительно есть что-то жесткое внутри крыла, что помогает держать форму. У меня уже есть идея, как воплотить это, заказала нужный материал. Когда приедет, закончу работу и крыло станет подвижным и управляемым, можно будет загибать в любую сторону и фиксировать так, как захочется 😺
Терноведь | Мастерская аксессуаров pinned «〰️〰️ Добро пожаловать в мою маленькую мастерскую 〰️〰️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ НАВИГАЦИЯ: Посмотреть и заказать товары из наличия можно на: АВИТО | ВБ Ресейл Видео и процесс работы: TikTok | YouTube 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️»
Ни дня без приколов, то Авито порежет просмотры под бустом, то тикток без каких-либо уведомлений ограничит аккаунт. Разбирательств никаких после уведомления от поддержки не последовало, и я без понятия как вообще до них дописаться, избегая ответов ИИ-шки. Всецело, мне конечно вести видео-формат совсем не хотелось, я даже подумывала найти кого-нибудь, кто будет помогать снимать контент. Пока решила заливать шортсы на …
Кажется, в рукокрылой коллекции намечается пополнение 🤍
Сейчас дополнительно разрабатываю корсетный пояс.
Хочется, чтобы его можно было носить с любым фасоном, меняя силуэт и настроение всего образа.
Пока работаю над формой и посадкой.
Думаю, вместе с рубашкой они будут смотреться особенно хорошо 🖤
Макет понемногу отшивается, но уже уверенно могу сказать - ткань я выбрала просто нереальную... На ощупь она настолько нежная, мягкая и бархатная, сидит как вторая кожа, невесомо облегая силуэт. Цвет и фактура - чистая роскошь!
🤩 Чуть позже покажу готовый вариант в мастерской, а дальше последует фотосессия, на которой постараюсь представить все элементы вампирско-крылатой коллекции 🤩
🤩 АНОНС! ВАМПИРСКИМ ГОТИЧЕСКИМ РУБАШКАМ БЫТЬ! 🤩
Воротнички есть, а с чем носить? Теперь будет!
Получила от вас очень много классных отзывов! Спасибо каждому, кто делился новым образом! 🦇
Однако, даже на личном опыте, стилизовать фигурный воротник бывает сложно: обычный рубашечный предательски выползает из-под крыльев, топорщится и портит всю драму! Решение не заставило себя долго ждать: перебрав все кровавые оттенк…
Незаслуженно обделенная вниманием модель! Самая сложная и самая любимая в изготовлении. Бантовые складки собираются вручную, а край обрабатывается тонким двойным швом. Мне очень нравятся такие заморочки...🌹
❤6👍4custom 53121945315699938682
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ternoved. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Терноведь | Мастерская аксессуаров” (@ternoved), 57 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ternoved.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
