Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Conscious Resistance

Channel

The Conscious Resistance

@theconsciousresistance

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,168subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001465141739
TypeChannel
Username@theconsciousresistance
Created24 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/theconsciousresistance

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@dbrozenews/1762530 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC@theconsciousresistance/5144 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 21:34 UTC1.004.1 hours
@dbrozenews/1762831 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC@theconsciousresistance/5146 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC1.0010 minutes
@dbrozenews/176361 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC@theconsciousresistance/5150 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 00:23 UTC1.001.9 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@dbrozenews7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minutes@dbrozenews (4–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 23 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @dbrozenews. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,1686,2606,2146 August 2026 — 6,260 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,260 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,254 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,244 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,239 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,238 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,231 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,228 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,220 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,215 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,202 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,188 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,180 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,173 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,168 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,154–6,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:376,168-5
15 Sept 2026, 13:196,173-7
12 Sept 2026, 07:396,180-8
8 Sept 2026, 10:406,188-14
3 Sept 2026, 09:456,202-13
31 Aug 2026, 08:376,215-5
28 Aug 2026, 08:136,220-8
25 Aug 2026, 02:566,228-3
21 Aug 2026, 23:496,231-7
19 Aug 2026, 04:486,238-1
15 Aug 2026, 19:566,239-5
12 Aug 2026, 01:336,244-10
9 Aug 2026, 10:076,254-6
6 Aug 2026, 09:316,260no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:236,260first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 09s
Average length
3m 03s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2945.3%
❤2437.5%
❤‍🔥57.81%
🔥46.25%
💯11.56%
🙉11.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026

NEW: Bringing Liberation 2030 to Life - The 2026 Activation Tour - NYC Journalist Derrick Broze recently completed the 26-city Activation Tour, traveling across the United States and spreading his message of Exit & Build strategy, and Liberation 2030. Watch the presentation in full from the New York City Activation. TCRN: https://theconsciousresistance.com/liberation2030-nyc/ Odysee: https://odysee.com/@theconscio…

11 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

THROWBACK to August 2021: Derrick Broze Exposes 5G Dangers to Houston City Council (2018-2020) From October 2018 to January 2020, Derrick Broze spoke at Houston City Council several times attempting to inform them of the dangers of 5g technology. In 2019, Derrick ran for Mayor of Houston seeking to halt the rollout of 5g in Houston. WATCH: https://theconsciousresistance.com/derrick-broze-exposes-5g-dangers-to-houst…

❤1

11 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC270 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

The Importance Of In-person Events And Taking Active Steps Towards Liberation In this clip, journalist Derrick Broze discusses why it is so important to become active and involved in community groups aiming to exit and build. Watching podcasts and being informed simply isn't enough, it is vital to network locally with like-minded people actively working on building solutions towards liberation. Watch the whole show…

❤1❤‍🔥1👍1

10 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC385 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Step Up, Take Action. It's Time To Get Reactivated! In this clip, journalist Derrick Broze discusses the fact that so many groups that were active during the immediate threats of Covid-1984 have slowly become inactive, and why it is necessary to once again find the motivation to take action against the encroachments of technocracy. Watch the whole show: Lessons From The Road – Get Up and Get Activated! ⏩ @TheConsc…

❤‍🔥1👍1

10 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC158 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

THROWBACK to April 2024: AI Surveillance, The Next Step In Excessive Policing? The use of artificial intelligence in law enforcement presents growing concerns with the expansion of mass surveillance. READ: https://theconsciousresistance.com/ai-surveillance-policing/ ⏩ @TheConsciousResistance

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC660 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Manifesting Liberation 2030 In this clip, journalist Derrick Broze discusses the importance of envisioning and putting effort into our Liberation efforts, outlining one's goals and how consistency and determination can make those goals a reality. Watch the whole show: Lessons From The Road – Get Up and Get Activated! ⏩ @TheConsciousResistance

❤7👍1

7 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC234 viewsread 12 August 2026

NEW: Lessons From The Road – Get Up and Get Activated! Derrick Broze checks in to share some lessons and experiences from his 2026 Activation Tour. Don’t miss these important insights and reminders about why we must gather in person as we focus on our Exit & Build, and Liberation 2030 goals! WATCH: https://theconsciousresistance.com/lessons-get-activated/ ⏩ @TheConsciousResistance

6 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC674 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

NEW: Lessons From The Road – Get Up and Get Activated! Derrick Broze checks in to share some lessons and experiences from his 2026 Activation Tour. Don’t miss these important insights and reminders about why we must gather in person as we focus on our Exit & Build, and Liberation 2030 goals! TCRN: https://theconsciousresistance.com/lessons-get-activated/ Odysee: https://odysee.com/@theconsciousresistance:7/lessons…

❤4

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC228 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

THROWBACK to December 2023: Keys to Creating and Sustaining a Successful Intentional Community With the world becoming more chaotic, increasing numbers of people are seeking to exit current structures in society and build parallel systems. As this happens, many people are deciding it would be beneficial and rewarding to live and share resources with a like-minded group of people in an “intentional community.” READ:…

🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC198 viewsread 12 August 2026

ICYMI: How to Communicate with the Land (Miriam Gomez -Rise & Vibes 2026) From Miriam Gomez: “Miriam is weaving together storytelling, prayers handed down through generations, and different simple practices to help guide us in cultivating our own unique approach to connecting with the land. Through opening our hearts and getting curious, we will explore how to have a real tangible, conscious, loving reciprocal con…

6 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTC194 viewsread 12 August 2026

THROWBACK to December 2020: Who is Fusus and SignalFrame? #SurveillanceState Derrick Broze breaks down recent reports indicating that the all pervasive Technocratic Surveillance State is almost complete. WATCH: https://theconsciousresistance.com/fusus-signalframe/ ⏩ @TheConsciousResistance

6 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC205 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Do you think content creators, journalists, activists, etc should be transparent about whether or not they use AI in the creation of their content? And, if they do use it, should they disclose how? Would you value those who offer transparency more than those who don't? The reason I ask this is because the Independent Media Alliance is preparing to release our AI Transparency Pledge calling on other content creators…

👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @theconsciousresistance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

COVID-19 Up
@COVID19Up · 26,101
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
Wide Awake Media - Official Channel
@realwideawakemedia · 37,273
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Independent Medical Alliance
@IMA_Health · 31,741
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
World Council for Health
@wch_org · 34,705
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
GreenMedInfo
@sayeregengmi · 27,942
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Children’s Health Defense
@childrenshd · 53,485
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Health Nut News/Erin Elizabeth
@erinhealthnutnews · 20,973
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Conscious Resistance” (@theconsciousresistance), 6,168 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theconsciousresistance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.