Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net -3,583. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,326–54,983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 03:45
50,863
-43
5 Nov 2026, 02:28
50,906
-55
4 Nov 2026, 00:30
50,961
-19
3 Nov 2026, 02:49
50,980
-30
2 Nov 2026, 02:29
51,010
-32
1 Nov 2026, 01:08
51,042
-35
30 Oct 2026, 22:41
51,077
-44
30 Oct 2026, 00:29
51,121
-37
28 Oct 2026, 23:48
51,158
-49
27 Oct 2026, 22:19
51,207
-26
26 Oct 2026, 23:40
51,233
-34
26 Oct 2026, 01:36
51,267
-22
25 Oct 2026, 04:48
51,289
-10
24 Oct 2026, 08:00
51,299
-58
23 Oct 2026, 05:26
51,357
-12
22 Oct 2026, 08:47
51,369
-70
21 Oct 2026, 02:05
51,439
-13
20 Oct 2026, 03:56
51,452
-39
19 Oct 2026, 02:00
51,491
-28
18 Oct 2026, 04:30
51,519
first reading
Engagement
294 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 50,863 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,510
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.936%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 294 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 October 2026
Posts held
294 (6 August 2026 – 10 October 2026)
Views total
11,010
Reactions total
103
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 03:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
77
Links
40
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,655 reactions across 291 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
3,182
56.3%
❤
987
17.5%
👏
303
5.36%
🥰
295
5.22%
🎉
288
5.09%
👍
141
2.49%
🙏
90
1.59%
🏆
86
1.52%
🤩
64
1.13%
💯
51
0.902%
😍
34
0.601%
🤓
29
0.513%
👌
22
0.389%
⚡
20
0.354%
🕊
18
0.318%
🙈
10
0.177%
💘
7
0.124%
😎
6
0.106%
🫡
6
0.106%
☃
5
0.088%
5 further kinds
11
0.195%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 291 of the 294 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 294 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Slots are full. 🔒
We have stopped enrollment for all membership.
Thank you so much for showing your interest and support.
We have limited slots, so unfortunately, we can’t accommodate everyone.
See you next time! 😊✨
Till then…
Seekhte raho, paisa banate raho. ...
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
BREAKING: SEBI may partly reverse its CAS rules
DETAILS INCLUDE:
Derivatives settlement expected to shift to last 30-minute VWAP
CAS for Derivatives may be stopped for at least 1 year
CAS may continue for less-liquid stocks
Changes could start by the end of Oct
What we have done in VIP group 👆
Total 3 trades
1st Cash segment Trade :- more than 5% ROI running 🔥
2nd Trade Persistent:- momentum was super fast not able to book profits on-Time , booked 51 points loss
3rd Trade Sensex :- Captured more than 100 Points 💯
Overall, a good profitable day 💚🟢
Slots are full. 🔒
No more enrollments for now.
Thank you so much for showing your interest and support.
We have limited slots, so unfortunately, we can’t accommodate everyone.
See you next year! 😊✨
Till then…
Seekhte raho, paisa banate raho. ...
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
September Performance 📊
Considering a minimum investment of ₹30–40K or 1 lot in options.
These are the trades we executed during September. Some trades are still open for bigger targets.
40+ trades executed in September, out of which 5 hit SL / ended in loss.
The above image shows the trades we took, along with entry, SL, target and booked price.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Trade with pro…
NIFTY50
Since our last posted levels, NIFTY has reached the levels we discussed in the above post 👆
Now, if we break this week’s levels, we need to look at the historical data.
Back in 2023, there was a gap around 20,350–20,600.
NIFTY could potentially come down to fill that gap, so that no major gap is left behind …and from there, a fresh rally could begin.
Simple example: Bahut badi building banani hai, usse p…
The whole social media , influencers, news media ....
Now i can see everyone getting bearish.
retailers will start building shorts at these levels...
Building new shorts at such levels will be super risky!
No preoccupied mindeset for Monday
We will do what our charts / data shows ...
Upar jayenge to bi bdiya...
niche aayenge to aur bdiya 😊
Apna Intraday PNL 💚 hona chahiye bss 🧿🤞
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥14❤2🎉2👏2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 294 posts we hold for @themausamnagpal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@themausamnagpal edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 18 posts on @themausamnagpal as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
16 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 294 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
VKS Trading @VkstradingOfficial · 34,763 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Vipul Singh Rana @vipulsinghranaa · 22,547 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 September 2026
Skillsiya @Skillsiya · 27,421 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 10 September 2026
Akash Soni @OfficialAasma · 58,960 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
IndiaBharti.in : Job Updates @indiabharti · 57,416 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 22 August 2026
Karishmatic Marketer @karishmaticmarketer · 51,384 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
Jobs for commerce Private @seekerascommerce · 124,387 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Find Jobs Vacancy @findjobsvacancy · 23,102 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 September 2026
Sibanand Pattnaik Official @SibanandPattnaik · 35,017 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 September 2026
JobSkull - MNC & Work From Home Job Updates @jobskull · 51,163 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Investor Kazi @investorkazi0 · 33,853 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
All One Day Exam's GK/GS/CA™ @All_One_Day_Exams · 88,433 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 August 2026
📣 𝗝𝗼𝗯𝘀 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 💼 @jobsstation_official · 107,090 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Jobsgovind Govt & Private Job Updates @jobsgovind · 279,022 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Stock Market Adviser @stockmarketadviser91 · 27,762 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Work From Home JOBS with Foundthejob @seekeraswfh · 88,150 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.