Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
49 measurements spanning 79 days, net -3,238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,739–44,949 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Oct 2026, 05:09
41,225
-32
24 Oct 2026, 08:19
41,257
-29
23 Oct 2026, 08:40
41,286
-24
22 Oct 2026, 10:29
41,310
-49
21 Oct 2026, 02:30
41,359
-34
20 Oct 2026, 04:17
41,393
-37
19 Oct 2026, 01:16
41,430
-51
17 Oct 2026, 22:29
41,481
-25
16 Oct 2026, 20:59
41,506
-33
15 Oct 2026, 18:49
41,539
-33
14 Oct 2026, 20:38
41,572
-52
13 Oct 2026, 15:59
41,624
-132
9 Oct 2026, 19:56
41,756
-195
5 Oct 2026, 11:21
41,951
-260
29 Sept 2026, 11:36
42,211
-499
17 Sept 2026, 21:59
42,710
-117
15 Sept 2026, 19:01
42,827
-49
14 Sept 2026, 05:19
42,876
-65
12 Sept 2026, 12:01
42,941
-110
10 Sept 2026, 10:16
43,051
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 153 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.18%
avg views ÷ 41,225 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.377%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held
38 (31 May 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total
6,560
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 05:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,940
Videos
≈469
Links
≈1,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
47s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
207 reactions across 31 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
141
68.1%
🔥
35
16.9%
👍
20
9.66%
🤔
4
1.93%
😱
3
1.45%
😁
2
0.966%
👏
1
0.483%
😢
1
0.483%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 38 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptocrownofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2026 to 15 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨 BITCOIN BELOW $81K — HOT US CPI INCREASES FED RATE HIKE CONCERNS! 📉
Bitcoin has dropped toward $81,000 following hotter-than-expected US inflation data.
🇺🇸 What happened?
• Headline CPI rose to 3.7% year-on-year, up from 3.4%.
• Core CPI increased to 2.6%, above the 2.5% forecast.
• Markets are now pricing in a higher possibility of further Fed rate hikes.
📉 Why is this bearish for Bitcoin?
Higher inflation could f…
📊 BITCOIN MARKET UPDATE & TRADING PLAN
Bitcoin is currently consolidating around a major supply zone, where selling pressure could push the price lower. Based on the current market structure, the probability favors a continuation of the downtrend from this area.
⚠️ However, US CPI data is scheduled for release today at 6:00 PM IST, which could trigger significant volatility in the crypto market.
🎯 Our Trading Plan…
🚨 BITCOIN WHALE MOVES $378 MILLION AFTER 6 YEARS! 🐳
📊 A dormant Bitcoin wallet has transferred 4,582 BTC worth approximately $377.6 million to five different addresses after holding the coins since March 2020.
🔍 WHY DOES THIS MATTER?
🔴 Potential selling pressure: If the BTC is sent to exchanges and sold, it could add pressure to the market.
⚠️ But no confirmed sale yet: The receiving wallets have not been confirmed a…
🚨 CRYPTO MARKET ALERT: $693 MILLION IN LONGS LIQUIDATED!
📉 More than $693 million in leveraged long positions were liquidated across the crypto market in the past 24 hours, according to Traders Union.
🔴 What does this mean?
• Bullish traders betting on higher prices were forced out of their positions.
• Forced liquidations can intensify short-term selling pressure.
• However, clearing excessive leverage can also crea…
🟠 BTC LONGS vs SHORTS — MARKET UPDATE
📊 24H Futures Positioning:
🟢 Long volume: $24.41B (47.72%)
🔴 Short volume: $26.75B (52.28%)
Shorts are slightly higher, while BTC is approaching a major resistance area.
What I’m watching 👇
• Multiple Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) are visible on the Bitcoin chart.
• The recent move higher came amid the SEC’s Innovation Exemption for certain tokenized-stock trading venues.
• The CLA…
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @cryptocrownofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
I’M BACK! 🚀
I know I’ve been inactive here for a while due to some personal issues. Now I’m back and want to make this channel valuable for you again. ❤️ What content do you want most? 👇
Only Crypto News Updates and Major Crypto Events42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 15 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Money @cryptoairdropcrown · 46,937 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
tradingcopter @tradingcopter · 17 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
IITian In Crypto @IITian_incrypto · 38,117 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
Navjot Brar @NAVJOTBRAR911 · 211,020 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
iPapkorn @iPapkorn · 1,840,142 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 August 2026
Tek Baaz @TekBaaz · 23,436 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
Dheeraj Mehra @dheerajmehra1 · 32,543 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
MoC Airdrop💰 @MoC_Airdrop · 28,264 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
everything hindi @everythingajay · 43,749 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
Sujal Jethwani @Sujaljethwani · 19,676 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 September 2026
Vishal Techzone @vishaltechzone · 30,182 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 5 September 2026
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋 @next10xgem1 · 324,932 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Universe @shivamcryptouniverse · 57,268 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Faizan Haroon @faizanharoontelegram · 49,707 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
PushpendraSinghOfficial @pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,684 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
CRYPTO TALKS @CryptoTalksBudhil · 86,215 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
Master of Crypto @mastercryptohq · 260,360 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
SMC KAPIL DEV @smc_Kapil_Dev · 378,526 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto With Bhavesh @cryptowithbhavesh · 24,613 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Crypto.kiran @cryptowithkiran · 35,958 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
Tech Ranjan Official @techranjanofficial · 46,619 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto King Keyur @CryptoKingKeyur · 619,754 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto With Khan @startfromzerofamily · 43,275 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 66 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Crown” (@cryptocrownofficial), 41,225 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptocrownofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.