Channel
@this_misty_garden
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,282subscribers
+274 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001650856876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @this_misty_garden |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/this_misty_garden |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 4,282 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 4,291 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 4,298 | -11 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 4,309 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:35 | 4,323 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 4,329 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 4,351 | -38 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 4,389 | +30 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 4,359 | +356 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 4,003 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 4,008 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 4,008 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
92 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 43.5% | |
| custom 5408871496623859133 | 18 | 19.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5467890746772183990 | 13 | 14.1% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.17% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📖 мені приїхав подарунок до дня народження від Юлії ☘️ безмежно вдячна ❤️ і оскільки ще діє акція Віват на secret book мені випала ще одна книжка — поезія «Сонце та її квіти» 🫣 я досі в шоці від розміру «Обителі помаранчевого дерева»
custom 54088714966238591339❤🔥6custom 54678907467721839903❤1
• не так я хотіла розповісти цю історію, не за таких обставин ☘️ у світі неймовірної кількості контенту та сотень книжкових рубрик КнигоЛенд помітили мою «надкушену книжку» й запропонували співпрацю ✨ 📖 особливо тепло було чути, що вони цінують мою ідею, тому для співпраці ми трішки змінили слова, але не концепцію а потім їхній склад згорів з усіма книжками 💔 ✍🏻 я надіслала свої відео, які збирала для блогу, але з…
❤21custom 54678907467721839905custom 54088714966238591333💔2😢2
{ 9 синіх книжок липня } ✍🏻 я зазначу, що більшість — дочитувала, а не починала з 0 📖 моєю єдиною помилкою було читати дві історії за мотивами Аїда та Персефони поспіль, важко було налаштуватись, бо історії різні, але тема одна • про кожну розповіла на фото ⚓️ «Донька короля піратів» • відгук 🐚 «Одеса степом і морем розказана історія» • відгук ☕️ «Пісні світанку» 👑 «Неонові боги» 🕯️ «Чоловіки без жінок та інші опо…
❤12custom 54678907467721839903custom 54088714966238591332
«Чоловіки без жінок та інші оповідання» Ернест Гемінґвей @starlev видання охоплює твори написані у 1923–1927 роках 📖 Особливість творів Гемінґвея — він часто не говорить про головне прямо, а залишає сильні образи, дії героїв, події, що викликають емоції й показують читачу більше, ніж могли б сухі надруковані літери, бо читач проживає історію, а не просто бачить висновки автора. ✍🏻 Про оповідання можна багато розпо…
❤🔥11❤6custom 54088714966238591334custom 54678907467721839902
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @this_misty_garden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“цей туманний сад” (@this_misty_garden), 4,282 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/this_misty_garden.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.