Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for toncells

Channel

toncells

@toncells

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

780subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793239244
TypeChannel
Username@toncells
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/toncells

Growth

780787783.56 August 2026 — 787 subscribers6 August 2026 — 787 subscribers14 August 2026 — 786 subscribers23 August 2026 — 783 subscribers30 August 2026 — 782 subscribers7 September 2026 — 780 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 779–788 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 23:35780-2
30 Aug 2026, 16:35782-1
23 Aug 2026, 05:24783-3
14 Aug 2026, 19:16786-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:34787no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:04787first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3841.8%
1617.6%
🔥1213.2%
🤡88.79%
👏44.40%
😁44.40%
🏆22.20%
🙏22.20%
11.10%
❤‍🔥11.10%
👎11.10%
🤔11.10%
🤗11.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2023 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC511 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Looks like a photo loading in the 90s Speed is about the same Fastest blockchain in the world, btw!

👍3👏1

2 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC496 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁2

2 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

UPD Since dton is closed, I decided to migrate the app to TON API Loading in batches of 10 NFTs & refetching if app hits rate limits Check it out on app.toncells.org ps update pushed to github repo thx to claude code he he* all images onchain only front-end app required to fetch all the data

👍2

26 Mar 2025, 22:20 UTC328 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

UPD added warning notes on the page & dton loading logic fix (they changed rate limits & there was a bug in my old code)

24 Mar 2025, 22:01 UTC320 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

!TONCELLS v2 NFTs are SBTs! they always were? v2 nfts cannot be transferred, there is a bug in the contract code. i found it today and fixed it (commit). if you have stuck toncoins on your nft contract you can edit the nft in the application and your stuck toncoins will come back to you. or maybe it’s not a bug — it’s a feature

👍3

22 Feb 2025, 12:20 UTC328 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

updates: * @toncellsbot v2 tg bot deployed with history of the project & TWA link * fix horizontal scrolling & other style issues * fix dton error texts on the page

👍6

22 Dec 2024, 20:50 UTC526 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

31👍1👎1

21 Dec 2024, 13:13 UTC488 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

updates: * toncells.org landing card has been updated, now it contains basic information as well as project history and links * v2 toncells moved to app.toncells.org + fixed some bugs with loading onchain data via dTON * old original v1 toncells moved to old.toncells.org ! toncells v1 was archived ! disabled the ability to connect wallet and buy new v1 nfts. removed the ability to edit v1 cells. disabled backend. f

🔥3🏆2👍1

27 Dec 2023, 14:54 UTC990 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

спасибо ребятам за теплые слова я считаю именно так должен продвигаться проект. активностью от холдеров, а не покупной рекламой

👏3👍21🔥1

18 Dec 2023, 16:31 UTC≈1,030 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

UPD отправил всем, кто минтил тонцелс2 нфт и заполнил форму, тоны обратно на их кошельки! можете посмотреть по последним транзакциям https://tonscan.org/address/EQACELBSnsN24mT_LzaBZQUp78I6Bt9qdVt2R57Crh8TSuLm (учитывай, что транзакции смотреть надо на даты написания поста) исключением являются два кошелька (первый / второй), по котормы у меня возникли вопросы. я прошу их валдельцев отписать мне @sepezho в лс

🔥5🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @toncells. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“toncells” (@toncells), 780 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toncells.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.