Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CARAT | TON MASON

Channel

CARAT | TON MASON

@tonmason

3 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,568subscribers

-483 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001731345488
TypeChannel
Usernames@masonton @ton_mason @tonmason
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tonmason

Growth

2,5683,0512,809.56 August 2026 — 3,051 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,050 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,051 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,049 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,034 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,020 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,020 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,980 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,943 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,929 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,871 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,833 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,819 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,745 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,736 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,695 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,695 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,689 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,675 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,672 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,652 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,644 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,644 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,630 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,618 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,618 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,609 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,603 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,602 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,597 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,593 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,587 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,579 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,579 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,568 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 33 days, net -483. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,496–3,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 20:192,568-11
5 Sept 2026, 00:192,579no change
4 Sept 2026, 18:422,579-8
2 Sept 2026, 10:222,587-6
1 Sept 2026, 11:172,593-4
31 Aug 2026, 23:382,597-5
30 Aug 2026, 02:252,602-1
29 Aug 2026, 21:032,603-6
28 Aug 2026, 17:132,609-9
27 Aug 2026, 00:322,618no change
26 Aug 2026, 18:482,618-12
25 Aug 2026, 14:532,630-14
23 Aug 2026, 17:442,644no change
23 Aug 2026, 15:052,644-8
22 Aug 2026, 18:582,652-20
20 Aug 2026, 10:032,672-3
20 Aug 2026, 06:122,675-14
19 Aug 2026, 03:452,689-6
17 Aug 2026, 11:142,695no change
17 Aug 2026, 10:182,695first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 18 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

311 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53483304021236374357323.5%
🔥4815.4%
👍4514.5%
3812.2%
3812.2%
🙏185.79%
custom 5456598478887075332154.82%
😁134.18%
🏆113.54%
🕊51.61%
🎉41.29%
🤨30.965%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
221
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 16 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
155
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonmason. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 December 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 05:14 UTC143 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо всем за содействие 🙏 На GetGems метаданные обновились, теперь картина такая:

🙏43custom 53483304021236374353👍1

25 Jul 2026, 04:29 UTC174 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

По какой-то неизвестной причине, метаданные медленно и плохо обновляются. В частности на GetGems Будет здорово, если вы нам поможете вручную их обновить (инструкция на картинках). Просто нужно перейти на любой NFT с «неопределенными атрибутами» и нажать “refresh metadata” (обновить метаданные) Ссылка: https://getgems.io/collection/EQCFttZHA0tsLteL-w8ymLH3Wa7YeB74CDyVBUB1UtTTKAwG

4👍3🙏3🕊1

10 Jul 2026, 06:49 UTC690 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

REMELTING v.2. Переплавка перстней состоялась ✅ Теперь в дефляторе лежит 1000 обновленных колец 💍😱🤩😲, на которых представлены : — Gram ☺️☺️ — Pixel 🔳 — Jetton 😃 — Telegram 📱 — Blum 🤑 — FollowDragons 🐊 — Arbuz 🤫 — Foxtails 🦊 — Dfc 💲 — Carat 👍 — Notcoin ☺️ — StonFi😊 — Aqua 🐟 — StormTrade ⚡️ — Durev 🙎‍♂️ — Catizen 🪙 — MarketApp🛒 — Hamster🐹 — Major⭐ — PlushPepe 🎁и многие другие…. Вы спросите : «а где же swap.coffee, @P

🔥12custom 53483304021236374359custom 54565984788870753326👍3🤨1

8 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC486 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Remelting 2.0. 👊😎 #remelting #intonwetrust #tonmason

🔥6custom 54565984788870753324custom 534833040212363743531

1 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC568 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔥 «Remelting» Part 2 🔥 🙌👁️🔜✅ Во всеуслышание сообщаем 🙀 — приближается долгожданная ВТОРАЯ БОЛЬШАЯ ПЕРЕПЛАВКА! 🪨🔥💍 Это означает, что блокчейн TON 💎 совсем скоро узрит: 🥇1028 УНИКАЛЬНЫХ NFT-ПЕРСТНЕЙ TON MASON 💍🤩🙌💰 ✨ Что вас ждёт: • Все атрибуты перстней были тщательно продуманы, отобраны и воплощены в жизнь 💫благодаря стараниям нескольких художниц 🖼 • Над проектом также работали сторонние разработчики и волонтёр

🔥8custom 53483304021236374355👍3custom 54565984788870753321

10 Apr 2026, 10:16 UTC991 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Жалкая копия: MTONGA Неповторимый оригинал: #INTONWETRUST🤑 😏😉😎

custom 53483304021236374359custom 54565984788870753324😁3🤨1

1 Mar 2026, 03:46 UTC≈1,370 views22 reactions155 Starsread 8 August 2026

Команда @tonmason совместно с очень опытным TON-разработчиком прямо сейчас трудится над важным смарт-контрактом для блокчейна TON ☺️ Мы обсуждали и продумывали эту идею более трёх лет и наконец приняли решение приступить к реализации. Также этот разработчик поможет нам завершить долгожданную вторую переплавку NFT (изображения уже готовы — осталась только техническая часть). К сожалению, всё упирается в ресурсы, вер

custom 5348330402123637435125🙏5

25 Jan 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,340 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

116👍5🏆2🔥1

15 Jan 2026, 02:01 UTC≈1,400 views27 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рост биткойна ☺️ за последние недели, скорее всего, не на пустом месте. Есть ощущение, что часть движения обеспечена деньгами из стран под жёсткими санкциями — в первую очередь Иран 🇮🇷 Не исключено, что там же крутятся венесуэльские и кубинские деньги. Очень удобно вывести миллиарды на флешке или в смартфоне — технологичный побег капитала из собственных стран🏃🏻‍♂️💵 Параллельно заметно оживились финансовые хабы: ОАЭ

👍127😁61🤨1

3 Jan 2026, 01:36 UTC980 views18 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

$CARAT ⏳ DeDust.io • CARAT EQD5cOofGH1LpZbkqxW2iF-VCE5SzKgP1K3ABxdnx6TOg1u1 🪙 Цена: 0.0₆206 🪙 ($0.0₆375) 📈 FDV: $14.38K • 💧 LP: $2.89K 🔓 LP Лок: ❌ 👑 Отказ от владения: ✅ Ⓜ️ CoinMarketCap • 🦅DexScreener ⭐️Смотреть Курс⭐️КУПИТЬ CARAT

🔥8👍54custom 53483304021236374351

2 Jan 2026, 06:17 UTC943 views21 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Привет 🤝 друзья! Нам нужна ваша помощь, чтобы увеличить шанс на получение верификации токена CARAT 👍на CoinMarketCap 🪙 Для этого : 1. Скачайте приложение CoinMarketCap (если этого ещё не сделали). 2. Затем перейдите по ссылке и Добавьте токен CARAT в «Избранные» (нужно нажать на звездочку в правом верхнем углу) Как вы понимаете, верификация пойдёт на пользу токену и его держателям, ведь CARAT увидят пользователи CM

custom 534833040212363743511👍5🕊41

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tonmason. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Welcome to $FTON
@welcometoFTON · 64,607
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CARAT | TON MASON” (@tonmason), 2,568 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonmason.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.