Мы живем в 1984. Я не читал, но мне Кац (иногент) сказал, что там про Россию. Заходишь - идет скан личности.
❤33custom 53032815424228653317custom 52966599784577181745❤🔥2🤣1😐1🙏1

Channel
@topkirill
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,559subscribers
+6,005 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001330051647 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @topkirill |
| Description | - Готовлю к ЕГЭ 16 лет! - Выпустил 100+ стобалльников; - Рецензент учебников истории Мединского; - Эксперт ФИПИ; - Спикер РВИО; ⚡️ 100Б №1 по результатам учеников ⚡️ЗАПИСАТЬСЯ НА ГОДОВОЙ+ 26/27⚡️ https://clck.ru/3Up57j РКН: https://clck.ru/3FTM3C А+ |
| Created | 22 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/topkirill |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:57 | 41,559 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:38 | 41,558 | +42 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:45 | 41,516 | +30 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:00 | 41,486 | +21 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:25 | 41,465 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:08 | 41,472 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:51 | 41,480 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 41,484 | +6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 41,478 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 41,479 | +32 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:31 | 41,447 | +45 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 41,402 | +18 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:55 | 41,384 | +31 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 41,353 | +53 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 41,300 | +84 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 41,216 | +49 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 41,167 | +39 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 41,128 | +47 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:06 | 41,081 | +42 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 41,039 | first reading |
1,003 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,003 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 990,040 |
| Reactions total | 32,305 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
99,142 reactions across 998 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40,836 | 41.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12,386 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5449427086093592198 | 8,271 | 8.34% | |
| custom 5303281542422865331 | 6,713 | 6.77% | |
| 🔥 | 5,033 | 5.08% | |
| custom 5296659978457718174 | 3,670 | 3.70% | |
| 👍 | 2,600 | 2.62% | |
| custom 5471882424952568180 | 1,971 | 1.99% | |
| 👎 | 1,688 | 1.70% | |
| 🙏 | 1,661 | 1.68% | |
| 🕊 | 1,615 | 1.63% | |
| 😭 | 1,325 | 1.34% | |
| 🤮 | 1,314 | 1.33% | |
| 👏 | 975 | 0.983% | |
| 🤣 | 951 | 0.959% | |
| 🥰 | 925 | 0.933% | |
| 🤯 | 890 | 0.898% | |
| 🎉 | 871 | 0.879% | |
| 😁 | 630 | 0.635% | |
| 💩 | 423 | 0.427% | |
| 26 further kinds | 4,394 | 4.43% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99,142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @topkirill. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 27 of 311 posts held from the last 30 days (8.68%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Мы живем в 1984. Я не читал, но мне Кац (иногент) сказал, что там про Россию. Заходишь - идет скан личности.
❤33custom 53032815424228653317custom 52966599784577181745❤🔥2🤣1😐1🙏1
Доброе утро. К новостям. Новый парламент США стал самый гейский за всю историю. В России хотят запретить пиццу. Мол, это преклонение перед Западом. Стас Михайлов стал врагом Украины. Всем хорошего дня.
❤75🤣25❤🔥8🙏4
Ваша любимая рубрика. 1 комментарий похоронил по фактам мой ютуб канал.
❤47custom 529665997845771817417custom 530328154242286533113🤣4❤🔥1😱1
Чета я в голосину заорал. У Сашки еще порох в стволе все-таки.
❤68custom 530328154242286533117custom 529665997845771817412custom 54494270860935921983❤🔥1🙏1
Video, posted without a caption
❤55custom 530328154242286533125🙏5❤🔥1
За буст даю 5 важных дат в период Ливонской войны. Сохранил - первую часть по Ливонской войне решил На курсе ученики получают полный доступ с квизлетом, где собраны все даты для ЕГЭ по истории. Удобно повторять в любом месте. Больше полезного контента на Гвардии+. Старт через 4 дня
❤30custom 530328154242286533110custom 52966599784577181746❤🔥1🙏1
Красавцы. Набрали.
custom 5296659978457718174106💩10❤7custom 54494270860935921983❤🔥1custom 53032815424228653311
Вы знаете, я очень редко вас прошу. Я редко нуждаюсь в вашей помощи. Почему вы не можете просто дать мне 4 уровень буста? Это малое дело.
🙏91😁19custom 547188242495256818010💩6❤4❤🔥4😢3custom 54494270860935921982
Помогите! У нас пропала реакция https://t.me/boost/topkirill
custom 544942708609359219848👎17custom 53032815424228653317💔5❤2🗿2custom 54718824249525681802❤🔥1
Чуваки, так с помощью регулярной практики и работы с куратором делаются 90+ баллов Мне важно, чтобы вы в процессе подготовки учились думать и понимать, что от вас требует эксперт в задании Гвардия+ стартует уже через 4 дня ЗАЛЕТЕТЬ ЗДЕСЬ
❤17🔥7❤🔥5custom 54494270860935921984custom 53032815424228653313custom 54718824249525681801
В Мурманске расположен самый длинный многоэтажный дом в России. 1488 метров (это не шутка). Вопросы?
❤81😁20❤🔥8custom 53032815424228653317custom 54494270860935921982custom 54718824249525681802👎1
Вот что пишут мои ученики, которые сдали историю на 89+. Все они регулярно решали домашки, варианты Артасова, ходили созвоны с куратором с дополнительной практикой Так чуваки и получаются высокие баллы - дисциплинированная работа, состоящая из регулярной практики и работы над ошибками На Гвардии+ с этой практики не дают слиться: домашки, дедлайны, кураторы и разбор ошибок. Огромная практика, которая позволяет тебе…
❤🔥19❤5🔥3🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,003 posts we hold for @topkirill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@topkirill edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Захотелось опросика Кто уже начал готовится
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Верховный главнокомандующий Путин заявил, что за Африкой будущее.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Мне реально интересно. Я думаю, что следующим важным этапом в развитии человечества будет постройка первого жилого модуля на Луне. Как вы думаете, какая страна первая сможет это сделать?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Перекличка.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Есть тут те, кто еще не записался на мой Годовой курс?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Давайте выборы здорового человека. За кого?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Топ-репетитор | ЕГЭ история | 100балльный репетитор🇷🇺” (@topkirill), 41,559 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/topkirill.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.