Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net +208. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,859–30,055 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 01:21
29,259
-26
5 Nov 2026, 21:47
29,285
-12
4 Nov 2026, 21:56
29,297
-41
3 Nov 2026, 18:25
29,338
-26
2 Nov 2026, 21:06
29,364
-33
1 Nov 2026, 18:09
29,397
-34
31 Oct 2026, 14:46
29,431
-19
30 Oct 2026, 13:55
29,450
-30
29 Oct 2026, 13:47
29,480
-30
28 Oct 2026, 13:44
29,510
-16
27 Oct 2026, 13:46
29,526
-37
26 Oct 2026, 13:57
29,563
-24
25 Oct 2026, 13:39
29,587
-15
24 Oct 2026, 15:10
29,602
-31
23 Oct 2026, 13:28
29,633
-14
22 Oct 2026, 16:50
29,647
-24
21 Oct 2026, 10:07
29,671
-10
20 Oct 2026, 10:37
29,681
-37
19 Oct 2026, 07:46
29,718
-33
18 Oct 2026, 05:51
29,751
first reading
Engagement
479 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 156 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.46%
avg views ÷ 29,259 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
168 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
168
of 479 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
479 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
268,202
Reactions total
13,341
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 01:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,770
Videos
≈508
Links
≈2,110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 42m
Average length
10m 42s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
36,387 reactions across 474 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
13,110
36.0%
🔥
5,595
15.4%
❤🔥
3,947
10.8%
custom 5276278082305531049
2,717
7.47%
💯
1,581
4.34%
💔
1,047
2.88%
💘
943
2.59%
😭
765
2.10%
⚡
744
2.04%
👍
715
1.96%
😁
668
1.84%
custom 5242222225758639027
636
1.75%
😢
351
0.965%
💅
302
0.83%
😎
298
0.819%
🦄
292
0.802%
💋
279
0.767%
😍
221
0.607%
🍾
217
0.596%
😨
212
0.583%
17 further kinds
1,747
4.80%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 474 of the 479 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,387 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 479 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 474 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @history_ege. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 479 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 168 posts held from the last 30 days (7.74%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
научиться писать вторую часть по ключам из сборников — почти нереально
вот, почему
когда сам готовишься, решать вторую часть не хочется. но и пропускать страшновато. и кажется норм идеей посмотреть задание, подумать над ним — потом ключи открыть и проверить свой несуществующий ответ. но не писать, конечно. чисто мысленно сформулировал, мысленно получил балл
потом открываешь ключи — и думаешь, а ну ясно. у меня всё…
ВСЯ ТЕОРИЯ ДО КОНЦА 17 ВЕКА ЗА ОДИН ВЕБ:
звучит незаконно, но мы попробуем
если у вас в голове пока примерно так:
Рюрик
🔽
Ольга кого-то сожгла
🔽
туда-сюда монголы
🔽
Иван Грозный
🔽
Лжедмитрий ест вилкой
🔽
что-то ещё было
то сегодня это исправим и заполним пробелы
https://youtube.com/live/hsMLDOc2mUM
https://youtube.com/live/hsMLDOc2mUM
приходите, чтобы повторить всё, что прошли
приходите, если еще ничего не прошл…
800 лет за полтора часа 👍
от Руси до XVII века
один мегастрим
вместо 500 страниц учебника у нас сегодня
https://youtube.com/live/hsMLDOc2mUM
в 16:00 по мск 😡
приходите онлайн
а пока держите конспект
ребят, а расскажите мне, пожалуйста, о ваших любимых местах? 👋
это может быть что угодно: кафешка, двор, алея у школы, спортивный зал — что угодно, что вы любите
покажите фотки, расскажите, что у вас связано с этим местом. мне интересно прочитать-посмотреть 👩🍳
начну: это одна из моих самых любимых кафешек тут, во Вьетнаме 🇻🇳 я сейчас мало куда хожу/езжу, потому что прям много работы
но сюда выбираюсь. тут уютно,…
к маю от осенних тем часто остаются одни названия 😮💨
и это нормально: история очень большая, всё сразу в голове не удержишь. поэтому на Спартанском 2.0 мы пройдём её три раза:
😶 в роликах — с нуля
😶 на вебе-повторении — в конце каждого месяца
😶 в мае — прямо перед ЕГЭ
как это устроено, что ещё помогает не забывать темы и как выглядит наше расписание — листайте карточки 🤩
чтобы на ЕГЭ вы пришли уверенными и спо…
Если вы уже прошли теорию ⤵️
👍 — до конца 17 века и мчите на ракете дальше
🌞 — где-то в 16-17 века сейчас
🤍 — догоняете 14-15 века
❤️🔥 — застряли в начале
🔥 — еще толком не начали…
то у меня к вам завтра дело
разберём на открытом вебе ВСЮ ТЕОРИЮ до конца 17 века
прям вот от Рюрика до Софьи. Даты все, личности, факты, карты
идеально тем, кто еще не начал / срочно догоняет
и тем, кто ушёл далеко и уже надо повтор…
вспоминаем освоение Сибири для егэ 🔥
по нашей шпаргалке 🤩
основные даты, города и люди, которые всех чаще выпадают в заданиях
👋 детально разобраться в теме можно по моему вебчику по землепроходцам
там самое мясо для второй части и полный разбор темы для егэ
🤩 одолеть егэшку с нами за 7 месяцев. с нуля
под французской королевской грамотой стоит подпись кириллицей: АНА РЪИНА ✍️
это Анна Ярославна, дочь Ярослава Мудрого и королева Франции. рьина — латинское regina, королева, просто записанное буквами родного языка 🤍
#доброеутро
как из такого решения (1) сделать такое (2)? ❤️
🧡 правильно: прийти на Спартанский 2.0. всему научим тут. вот что у нас для этого есть:
🔸 курс по второй части
в двух подробных роликах разберём, как писать каждое задание нового кима на максимум
🔸 спартанская домашка
лучший способ научиться писать ответы — писать их. этим и занимаемся на курсе каждую неделю
🔸 подробные рецензии куратора
на тарифах с проверкой курат…
❤12🔥4🤗4💯1
Signed Нина
Showing the 12 most recent of 479 posts we hold for @history_ege. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@history_ege edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @history_ege as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 479 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
История вокруг нас | Эля Смит | История ЕГЭ СМИТАП @elya_smith · 29,802#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Егор Кант ЕГЭ обществознание @histkant · 48,470 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
Топ-репетитор | ЕГЭ история | 100балльный репетитор🇷🇺 @topkirill · 41,577 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
История вокруг нас | Эля Смит | История ЕГЭ СМИТАП @elya_smith · 29,802 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
Никита Равич | История ЕГЭ 2028 Умскул | Следствие вели историки @ravichhist · 23,361 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
Аля Виноградова | История ЕГЭ 2027 | Такая вот история | Умскул @alyahist · 54,280 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Кружок | Олимпиадная школа @kruzhok_olimp · 39,965 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
Валентиныч | Обществознание ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @valentinitch · 65,765 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
история и котики / ЕГЭ ОГЭ 2027 стадикэтс иик @historyandcats · 39,435 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
обществознание и котики / ЕГЭ ОГЭ 2027 стадикэтс @socialandcatss · 21,766 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Настя Малова | Обществознание ЕГЭ Умскул @umnastya · 99,284 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
очки эксперта | егэ налегке обществознание 2027 @egenalegke · 27,030 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Даша Львова | История ОГЭ 2027 | Львиные истории | Умскул @lion_history · 53,387 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Глазами филолога | Неля Лотман | Русский язык ЕГЭ СМИТАП @nelya_lotman · 22,281 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 September 2026
Русский ЕГЭ | Вера Флекс 100балльный репетитор @vera_egeflex · 93,451 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Егор Кант ОГЭ Обществознание 2027 Школково @kant_soc · 53,830 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПРО100 ЕГЭ История” (@history_ege), 29,259 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/history_ege.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.