Channel
@trackandfield
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,453subscribers
-71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001092027708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trackandfield |
| Created | 25 November 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trackandfield |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 4,453 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 4,452 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 4,453 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 4,466 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 4,473 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 4,490 | -16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 4,506 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 4,516 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 4,509 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 4,512 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 4,524 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 4,524 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
622 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 224 | 36.0% | |
| 🔥 | 148 | 23.8% | |
| 💔 | 111 | 17.8% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 6.27% | |
| 💯 | 32 | 5.14% | |
| 🕊 | 30 | 4.82% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 3.38% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 2.25% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.482% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,033 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я обожаю коллаборации. Мне кажется, они до сих пор актуальны и могут привлекать дополнительное внимание обоим брендам. Чтобы всё сложилось, первое и самое важное — оба бренда должны быть одинаково заинтересованы. Если один изо всех сил хочет получить результат, а для второго это просто очередной инфоповод, скорее всего, ничего интересного не получится. Второе — созданный продукт должен быть чем-то новым и подчёркив…
❤19🔥15👍3
Открыт к проектам в области брендинга, стратегии и креатива для спортивных брендов: [email protected].
❤29🔥13👍11😁5
Август станет моим последним месяцем в Die Hard. Когда-то после увольнений мне хотелось объяснить, что было не так в компании. Сейчас понимаю, что чаще всего менялась не компания, а я. За последнее время изменились мои интересы, взгляд на работу и то, чем мне хочется заниматься дальше. Меня всё больше привлекает работа над брендами: создание стратегии, поиск позиционирования, развитие визуального языка и руководств…
💔64🔥46❤26😁3😢3💯2🕊1
Я купил велосипед летом 2022 года. Мозг тогда был настолько перегружен, что единственным здоровым выходом для меня оказалось вспомнить, как это — кататься. И я заново влюбился в велосипед. Возможность просто взять и крутить педали без особых планов оказалась именно тем, что было нужно. В Испанию мы перебирались с огромными чемоданами и рюкзаками, поэтому взять велик с собой шансов не было. А потом не было сил и врем…
🔥74❤57👍21🕊3👎1💔1
Помните времена, когда мы рабочие задачи решали через email? Не ответить в тот же день было нормой. Сейчас мы как будто все больше уходим в количество, а не качество. Больше ценим скорость. Производим больше вещей, быстрее их меняем, постоянно запускаем что-то новое. Наверное, поэтому и сроки ответа уменьшились до нескольких часов. Как то же нужно успевать обрабатывать такой объем. Интересно, нужно ли нам столько в…
💔45💯29🕊10❤7👍3👎1😁1
Недавно прочитал, что кризис даёт пространство творчеству. И если посмотреть на бег, то точно соглашусь — такого бума брендов я раньше не видел. И радуют те, кто не пытается сделать ещё один базовый бренд. Будем наблюдать!
❤35🕊15👎5👍1💯1
Установили норматив.
❤51😁12👎7💔1🕊1
Офигенно!
Постоянно слышу споры, что лучше работает: галереи или короткие видео. В какое время выкладывать. Сколько секунд должен быть контент. Человек вот просто селфи выложил. Ну и забил ещё два мяча бразильцам.
Мне кажется, я вырос на историях о Тур де Франс. О том, что где-то далеко есть такая удивительная гонка. Я с детства знаю её логотип и что жёлтая майка — символ лидера. Потому что мои бабушка и дедушка были в про велоспорте. Сегодня я впервые оказался на той самой гонке из детства. Жизнь — удивительная штука.
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @trackandfield. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эндибари” (@trackandfield), 4,453 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trackandfield.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.