Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Трендли

Channel

Трендли

@trendtrendtrend

Not marked by Telegram, checked 10 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

1,187,252subscribers

-55,837 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003649762474
TypeChannel
Username@trendtrendtrend
DescriptionДиджитал-медиа, где АI-маскот и редакция делятся высокоранговыми трендами и поясняют за стиль и свагу. Сотрудничество: @whoisdonny РКН — https://rkn.link/jt7 Работаем с @Spiral_Yuri и Perfluence
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/trendtrendtrend

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

1,187,2521,354,7091,270,980.57 August 20265 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 90 days, net -55,837. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,162,133–1,379,828 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 19:251,187,252-3,485
4 Nov 2026, 20:491,190,737+1,040
3 Nov 2026, 18:501,189,697-1,966
2 Nov 2026, 15:061,191,663-5,024
1 Nov 2026, 14:561,196,687-3,828
31 Oct 2026, 18:111,200,515-5,636
30 Oct 2026, 16:101,206,151-4,731
29 Oct 2026, 17:551,210,882-2,620
28 Oct 2026, 17:171,213,502-160
27 Oct 2026, 18:201,213,662-105
26 Oct 2026, 17:171,213,767-3,464
25 Oct 2026, 19:091,217,231-4,783
24 Oct 2026, 20:561,222,014-2,929
23 Oct 2026, 23:551,224,943-35
22 Oct 2026, 22:281,224,978-3,693
21 Oct 2026, 20:091,228,671-5,490
20 Oct 2026, 16:201,234,161-589
19 Oct 2026, 15:281,234,750-283
18 Oct 2026, 15:281,235,033-98
17 Oct 2026, 16:311,235,131first reading

Engagement

546 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.65%
avg views ÷ 1,187,252 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,600
168 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.297%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
168
of 546 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held546 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total3,289,330
Reactions total9,771
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,040
Videos
≈699
Links
≈63

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
38m 32s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 160 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

Computed from 168 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 161 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 4.1 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 27.3% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 74.8% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 15,500 views — 1.31% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 18,500).

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/62196 Nov 2026, 16:04 UTC221 minutes – 56 minutes old3,400 views ~10 reactionsno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24h24 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/62186 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC641 minutes – 2.9 hours old7,840 views ~8 reactions60 minutes: 4,199 interp. → 3.0 hours: 7,840still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h54 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/62116 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC1125 minutes – 5.7 hours old9,890 views ~18 reactions60 minutes: 3,380 interp. → 3.0 hours: 6,861 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/62106 Nov 2026, 06:49 UTC1721 minutes – 10 hours old10,900 views ~24 reactions60 minutes: 3,986 interp. → 3.0 hours: 7,831 interp. → 6.0 hours: 9,860still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h88 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/62096 Nov 2026, 06:49 UTC1721 minutes – 10 hours old10,800 views ~16 reactions60 minutes: 4,009 interp. → 3.0 hours: 7,873 interp. → 6.0 hours: 9,820still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h87 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/62056 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC204 minutes – 12 hours old12,100 views ~37 reactions60 minutes: 3,469 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,383 interp. → 6.0 hours: 10,700 → 12 hours: 12,100still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/62015 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC39under a minute – 22 hours old13,300 views ~64 reactions60 minutes: 3,015 interp. → 3.0 hours: 5,284 interp. → 6.0 hours: 6,180 → 12 hours: 10,800still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h7.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/62005 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC43under a minute – 24 hours old12,900 views ~35 reactions60 minutes: 3,520 interp. → 3.0 hours: 6,883 interp. → 6.0 hours: 8,910 → 12 hours: 10,100 → 24 hours: 12,900still climbing at last reading12,900measured2.8 hours

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

36,865 reactions across 546 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22,12060.0%
🤣3,5739.69%
🔥3,4999.49%
👍1,4403.91%
😁1,2833.48%
💔9982.71%
🌚9172.49%
🤯8192.22%
👀7972.16%
💯5961.62%
😭4591.25%
🙏3640.987%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 546 of the 546 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,865 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 546 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.10%
6 of 546 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
6
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
18,200
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
22,400
over 540 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjd7De5r129 October 202629 October 2026
2SDnjee3wCw129 September 202629 September 2026
2VSb5xBtrUA110 August 202610 August 2026
2VtzqvmhWpB114 August 202614 August 2026
2VtzqvwYWRB18 October 20268 October 2026
2VtzqxFf7De112 September 202612 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 546 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 168 posts held from the last 30 days (2.98%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:04 UTC≈3,400 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

YEEZY выкатили ПРОЗРАЧНЫЕ сапоги — Канье Уэст снова вернулся в моду спустя четыре года, на этот раз с женским дропом обуви. Одной из самых необычных вещей коллекции Season 01 стали полупрозрачные чёрные сапоги с острыми носами и тонкими каблуками. Выглядят как резиновые чулки на шпильках в фирменной цветовой гамме. Кстати, показ прошёл в Лос-Анджелесе и совпал с открытием первого полноценного магазина YEEZY. Йе сн…

🤣8❤1👀1

6 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC≈7,840 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Вышел тизер спин-оффа «Очень странных дел». Netflix заказал приквел под названием «Иные миры». Подробности сюжета пока держат в секрете, но уже выпустили короткий тизер. Премьера запланирована на 2028 год. Вот это ждём 🍴

💔5❤2🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC≈9,890 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Портрет из СТАРОЙ ТЕХНИКИ — художник Michael Agwu собирает панно с женскими образами из мышек, цифрвых мыльниц, наушников, геймпадов и другого оборудования. Конкретно эта работа была создана в дуэте с благотворительным фондом Child's Play, а всеми этими контроллерами когда-то играли дети во время пребывания в больнице. Автор часто разрезает и плавит пластмассовые корпуса, чтобы конечная работа выглядела как единое …

❤13🔥2😁2👀1

6 Nov 2026, 06:49 UTC≈10,900 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Первая косметичка любой уважающей себя школьницы 😎

❤23🌚1

6 Nov 2026, 06:49 UTC≈10,800 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤16

6 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC≈12,100 views37 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Маркет STABILO для ГУБ — канцелярский бренд заколлабился с KIKO и выкатил свои легендарные линеры в формате косметики. В коллекции вышло пять оттенков: от бежевого до красного. В остально визуально эта помада ничем не отличается от обычного фломастера. Даже эффект на губах оставляет похожий. Посвящается всем, кто в школе рисовал себе фрэнч замазкой 😏

❤29💯5🤣3

5 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC≈13,300 views64 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Автомат с бьющимися ДЕВУШКАМИ появился в Авиапарке — необычный поп-ап установили в честь выхода сериала Красота. Внутри стоят прозрачные фигурки девушек, которые разбиваются при попытке достать их из автомата. В инсталляции обыграли идею хрупкости красоты, которая превращена в товар. Причем это прямо касается и сути сериала, который рассказывает о первом в СССР конкурсе красоты. Красиво и грустно 💧

💔44❤12🔥5🤣3

5 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC≈12,900 views35 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Так вот откуда они берутся в парках 😁

😁24💯6❤5

5 Nov 2026, 15:15 UTC≈13,500 views28 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Сквишнутые арты от студии Endless Tools — случайное искусство от проекта для 3Д-художников. Студия хотела показать в деле работу нового инструмента, который превращает объекты в сквиши. В итоге пост завирусился, а в комментариях пользователи, не связанные со сферой, пишут, что получили эстетическое удовольствие от картинок. Голубь особенно хорош 😁

❤19💯6👀3

5 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC≈13,100 views37 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Свет, камера, промпт, видео! В ГигаЧате можно оживить любой снимок: добавить движение, атмосферу, а теперь ещё и ЗВУК. И всё это буквально по одному промпту: быстро, бесплатно и без ВПН. Чтобы создать ролик, нужно открыть раздел «Видео» на сайте ГигаЧата, загрузить фото и рассказать, что должно произойти в кадре. Делюсь промптами, которые точно умилят каждого: Позади персонажа возникает гигантский пушистый кот, ул…

🤣18❤11🔥6💔2

5 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC≈14,800 views73 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Платье-череп придумал IDEN — дизайнер показал эффектный вечерний наряд, который повторяет форму лицевых костей. Облегающее платье в пол украшено реалистичным изображением черепа в фиолетовых оттенках. При этом рукава пришиты к основе изделия, так что руки модели образуют огромные глазницы. Руки в боки и вперед пугать соседей 😁

❤43🤣20💯8👍2

5 Nov 2026, 06:44 UTC≈16,600 views86 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Березовые КАБЛУКИ — российская дизайнер Alina Andreichishena показала туфли из деревянных пеньков, а также сумку к ним. Самые русские туфли 😁

❤46🤣30👍6💔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 546 posts we hold for @trendtrendtrend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@trendtrendtrend edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 September 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @trendtrendtrend as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
27 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Трендли” (@trendtrendtrend), 1,187,252 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trendtrendtrend.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.