Channel
@trueminds
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,308subscribers
+210 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001996512692 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trueminds |
| Description | 🏆 Join the elite 1% - Premium strategies and insights for exceptional growth 👩🎓👨🎓 Real Knowledge that MATTER! ⬆️ The best channel to lift you up! Admin: @love_data Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/trueminds |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trueminds |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 27,308 | +6 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 27,302 | +9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 27,293 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 27,294 | +14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 27,280 | +21 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 27,259 | +4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 27,255 | +11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:49 | 27,244 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:47 | 27,247 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 27,239 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 27,226 | +20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 27,206 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 27,200 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 27,198 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 27,206 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 27,200 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 27,204 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 27,196 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 27,199 | +12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 27,187 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (20 July 2026 – 12 September 2026) |
| Views total | 13,034 |
| Reactions total | 175 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 16:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
504 reactions across 38 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 479 | 95.0% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 2.58% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.794% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.794% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.794% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 504 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Tip of the day: 🌙 Before you sleep, stop replaying conversations you can’t change and worrying about situations that haven’t happened yet. Your mind deserves a break too. Leave tomorrow’s problems for tomorrow and allow yourself to rest without having every answer tonight. Some things can wait. Your peace doesn’t have to. ✨💯 Double Tap ❤️ If You Agree
❤26💯1
Tip of the day: 🌱 Don’t confuse being alone with being lonely. Sometimes stepping away from noise, people, and constant communication is exactly what you need to hear your own thoughts again. Use your alone time to recharge, reflect, and reconnect with yourself. Not every quiet moment needs to be filled. Sometimes silence is where you find yourself. 💯✨
❤12
✨ Sometimes, What Feels Like Loss Is Actually Redirection If you got rejected, maybe you were being saved from the wrong place. If someone left you, maybe they simply made room for someone who is meant to stay. If something didn't work out, maybe it was protecting you from something you couldn't see yet. And if you're having a bad day, maybe it's not the end of your story — maybe tomorrow is bringing something yo…
❤23
🧠 HOW TO KNOW IF SOMEONE IS A GOOD PERSON You can't know someone's character from how charming, polite, or helpful they are when everything is going well. Character becomes clearer through patterns — especially when they have nothing to gain. 👉 1. Watch how they treat people they don't need Pay attention to how they treat waiters, strangers, juniors, or people who cannot offer them anything. Kindness that disappe…
❤9
🧠 YOU CAN ALWAYS CHOOSE WHAT YOU BECOME You can't always choose what happens to you. You can't choose your past. You can't control other people's actions. You can't prevent every disappointment. You can't control every circumstance. But you can choose what you do with what happens. You can choose to learn instead of staying stuck. You can choose discipline when motivation disappears. You can choose kindness wit…
❤17
🧠 HOW TO BECOME YOUR TRUE SELF You can spend years becoming the person everyone expects you to be... Trying to fit in. Trying to impress people. Trying to avoid judgment. And somewhere along the way, you can lose touch with what you actually want. 👉 1. Know what you genuinely value Your values should guide your decisions more than other people's expectations. Example: If you value freedom but constantly choose …
❤13
❤️
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6👍1
🧠 HOW TO BECOME UNRECOGNISABLE Sometimes you don't need to tell people you're changing... You just need to become so disciplined, so focused, and so different that your old version barely feels like you. 👉 1. Change your habits Your life changes when your daily behavior changes. Fix your routine and become consistent. 👉 2. Transform your body Exercise regularly. Improve your fitness, posture, grooming, and …
❤10
Tip of the day: Stop trying to be understood by everyone. Some people will judge you based on their own assumptions, experiences, and biases. You don’t have to constantly prove your intentions or defend every choice you make. Be honest, stay true to yourself, and let your consistency speak for you.
❤8
Hi guys! 👋 I have decided to start a new Finance Series 💰📚 The goal is simple — to help everyone understand important financial concepts in an easy and practical way. We’ll start from the basics and gradually move towards advanced topics like investing, markets, financial analysis, and wealth building. Here are the 50 topics I’ll be covering: 💵 1. What Is Money & How Does the Financial System Work? 🏦 2. How Ban…
❤28
🧠 HOW TO READ PEOPLE BETTER — PART 1 People often think reading people means looking at their body language... But understanding people is much deeper. 👉 1. Start with their baseline Before interpreting someone's behavior, first understand how they normally behave. Example: If someone normally speaks quietly, their quiet voice doesn't necessarily mean they're nervous. But if they normally speak confidently and…
❤17
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @trueminds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 57 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TrueMinds | Personality Development - Words of Wisdom & Life Quotes” (@trueminds), 27,308 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trueminds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.