Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
54 measurements spanning 85 days, net -2,349. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,973–27,026 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 12:56
24,325
-34
4 Nov 2026, 11:18
24,359
-27
3 Nov 2026, 11:05
24,386
-23
2 Nov 2026, 14:21
24,409
-28
1 Nov 2026, 17:20
24,437
-25
31 Oct 2026, 19:07
24,462
-7
30 Oct 2026, 22:36
24,469
-31
30 Oct 2026, 02:00
24,500
-34
29 Oct 2026, 03:21
24,534
-42
28 Oct 2026, 00:06
24,576
-48
26 Oct 2026, 21:40
24,624
-24
25 Oct 2026, 20:57
24,648
-81
24 Oct 2026, 19:58
24,729
+81
23 Oct 2026, 16:50
24,648
-27
22 Oct 2026, 19:50
24,675
-38
21 Oct 2026, 18:50
24,713
-50
20 Oct 2026, 11:26
24,763
-21
19 Oct 2026, 11:00
24,784
-23
18 Oct 2026, 12:15
24,807
-13
17 Oct 2026, 15:16
24,820
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,660
Videos
≈1,250
Links
≈3,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 36s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,792 reactions across 31 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
414
23.1%
❤
411
22.9%
🔥
390
21.8%
😁
379
21.1%
👏
151
8.43%
💯
25
1.40%
👌
12
0.67%
🐳
9
0.502%
🕊
1
0.056%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,792 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣SUPER O'YIN BOSHLANDI 😍
⚡️ Terma jamoamiz uchun muhim o'yinlardan biri!
🤝 O'rtoqlik uchrashuvi
🇺🇿 O‘zbekiston ⚡️ Suriya 🇸🇾
🔥 Telegram orqali JONLI EFIR sifatli formatda ko'rish uchun pastdagi tugmani bosing. 👇🏻
https://t.me/+y0iEsHNhY5s3ZWE6
https://t.me/+y0iEsHNhY5s3ZWE6
🇺🇿▶️ Bobur Ispanchik va Erkebulan Toktar jang qiladigan IBA Nomad turniri boshlandi!
👇JONLI EFIRGA QO’SHILISH👇
https://t.me/+W6daY7MRaRsyY2Yy
https://t.me/+W6daY7MRaRsyY2Yy
⚡️ Alexander Volkanovski Movsar Evloev uni faqat nokaut orqali mag‘lub eta olishini aytdi! 👀
🗣️ “Movsarning eng yaxshi imkoniyati meni nokaut qilish… O‘z divizionimda hech kim meni hakamlar qarori bilan mag‘lub eta olishiga ishonmayman.“
Boks|MMA|UFC
⚡️👀 Carlos Prates: “Islam, men eng oson raqibman, men bilan jang qilishga rozilik ber”
🗣️ “Islamga shuni aytmoqchimanki, men u uchun eng oson raqibman. Kamaru Usmanning kurashi menikidan ancha yaxshi, Michael Morales esa jismonan ancha kuchli.
Meni ularga qaraganda kurashga tushirish ancha oson. Qani, Islam, men bilan jangga rozilik ber. Bu sen uchun oson sayr bo‘ladi.”
Boks|MMA|UFC
⚡️ Umar Nurmagomedov agar Merab Dvalishvili chempionlikni qo‘lga kiritsa, navbatdagi da’vogar o‘zi bo‘lishiga ishonmoqda! 👀
💬 “Agar Petr g‘alaba qozonsa, menimcha, ular O’Malleyga imkon berishadi. Agar Merab g‘alaba qozonsa, menimcha, navbatdagi jang menga beriladi.”
Boks|MMA|UFC
⚡️ GOAT 🐐
🏆 7 ta titul jangida g‘alaba
🏆 5 marta kamar himoyasi - yengil vaznda 4 ta, yarim o‘rta vaznda 1 ta titul himoyasi
🏆 Ikki vazn toifasida chempion!
🏆 UFC tarixidagi eng uzun g‘alabali seriya - 17 ta ketma-ket g‘alaba! 🔥
Boks|MMA|UFC
🏆 Islam Maxachev ga’labali seriyasini 20 taga yetkazmoqchi!
🗣️ “Keling, ketma-ket g‘alabalar seriyasini 20-0 ga yetkazaylik, shunda rekordimizni hech kim yangilay olmaydi. Menimcha, 20 juda yaxshi raqam.”
Boks|MMA|UFC
🚨 Rasman! Arman Tsarukyan 19-sentabr kuni UFC 331 turnirida Mauricio Ruffyga qarshi jang qiladi! 👀
Boks|MMA|UFC
👍40😁18❤12🐳3
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @ufcboxing_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @ufcboxing_uz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Daryo | Sport24 @daryo_sport24 · 29,254 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
UFC MMA YANGILIKLARI @ufc_mma_yangiliklari_uz · 41,982 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 29 August 2026
UFC | MMA @ufc_mma_octagon · 17,975 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 September 2026
uzcombat @uzcombat_tv · 31,200 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
Judo Uz @judouz · 19,522 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026
Boxing Uzbekistan @boxinguzbekistan · 20,866 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
OCTAGON | MMA LEAGUE @octagonleague · 33,678 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BOKS|MMA|UFC” (@ufcboxing_uz), 24,325 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ufcboxing_uz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.