Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Увлеченный Финансист

Channel

Увлеченный Финансист

@ufinansist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

932subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002234343540
TypeChannel
Username@ufinansist
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ufinansist

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

932971951.57 August 2026 — 971 subscribers7 August 2026 — 971 subscribers15 August 2026 — 964 subscribers22 August 2026 — 960 subscribers28 August 2026 — 954 subscribers6 September 2026 — 942 subscribers14 September 2026 — 932 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 926–977 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 12:18932-10
6 Sept 2026, 22:38942-12
28 Aug 2026, 18:54954-6
22 Aug 2026, 02:04960-4
15 Aug 2026, 18:48964-7
7 Aug 2026, 10:51971no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:32971first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6822.1%
🔥4916.0%
😁4815.6%
❤‍🔥4013.0%
🤝3812.4%
custom 5460940261326592627144.56%
👍134.23%
custom 5922771055214071094123.91%
custom 521521521370334900092.93%
🤣82.61%
💯61.95%
😭20.651%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ufinansist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC72 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤝5❤‍🔥3🔥32

6 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC177 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

нагло украдено из запрещенных сетей интернетовских, но все же Ведь могли же раньше? И двигать ничего не надо было #безтега

8😁6🔥4❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC190 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫥 Сказка про колобка - это, вообще-то, учебник по риск-менеджменту #управление_личными_деньгами Будучи ярым фанатом Человека-Паука, а в особенности мультика 1994 года, наблюдаю за бурлением разных комментариев в интернете по поводу экранизации сказки "Колобок" (или как там оно называется) В какой-то момент пришла мысль, что прекрасную русскую сказку я помню отрывисто и не помню сути. Перечитал. Понял, что это же

😁7🔥6❤‍🔥4🤝32

5 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC188 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

любуюсь вот иногда картинка к посту выше #инвестиции #юмор (хотя смешного тут мало..)

custom 592277105521407109474👍4🤝1😭1

5 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC185 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫥 Сколь веревочка не вейся: дефолт Евротранса #инвестиции Итак, этот день настал. Для кого-то он был ожидаем, для кого-то это черный лебедь, но факт остается фактом - Евротранс допустили дефолт по трем своим облигациям: $RU000A10BVW6 Объем: 4,0 млрд руб. Ставка купона: 23% (ежемесячно) Дата погашения: 20.05.2032 $RU000A10E4X3 Объем: 2,5 млрд руб. Ставка купона: 20% (ежемесячно) Дата погашения: 27.12.2030 $RU000A

🤝4custom 52152152137033490002custom 59227710552140710942😭1

4 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC195 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫥 Апдейт: дивиденды дошли #инвестиции Возвращаясь к посту про ИИС и дивотсечку - деньги от Сбера только что упали на карту в Т-Банке, уже очищенные от НДФЛ. То есть ровно по той схеме, о которой писал: не на ИИС напрямую, а сначала на карту. Дальше по плану - завожу эту сумму на ИИС как обычное пополнение и в следующем году забираю с неё вычет 13%. Никакой магии, просто на пару кликов больше, чем "получать сразу

🔥8👍5❤‍🔥32

2 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC254 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫥 Дружба как статья расходов - и почему самые ценные моменты стоят почти ноль #управление_личными_деньгами Получаешь сообщение «давай встретимся?» - и вместо радостного «конечно!» в голове запускается калькулятор. Такси туда-обратно, ужин в нормальном месте, может ещё билеты куда-то. И вот уже думаешь: не отложить ли до следующей зарплаты? Это не жадность и не равнодушие. Это побочный эффект мира, в котором дружб

❤‍🔥7🤝54💯3😁1

31 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC256 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Всегда ищите дурака в сделке. Если вы его не найдёте — это вы» Марк Кюбан, венчурный инвестор #жзл

custom 52152152137033490006custom 54609402613265926273custom 59227710552140710943❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC281 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫥 Траншевая ипотека: платёж 1 800 рублей в месяц - это не шутка #недвигочетверг Когда застройщик пишет в рекламе «платёж от 1 800 рублей» - первый инстинкт отмахнуться. Ну понятно же, что где-то подвох. Но подвох там не там, где кажется. 🔷Как это работает Банк выдаёт кредит не сразу полной суммой, а частями - они называются в банковской среде "траншами". Транш 1️⃣ небольшой, иногда совсем символический - скажем

🔥84👍4🤝4

27 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC302 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫥 Где ЦБ может потушить инфляцию, а где - нет #лонгрид 24 июля ЦБ снизил ключевую ставку до 14% годовых и в тот же день повысил прогноз по инфляции на 2026 год с 4,5-5,5% до 6,0-7,0%. Со стороны выглядит странно: цены ускоряются - ставку опускают. Логика тут есть, но чтобы её увидеть, надо разобраться в двух составляющих, которые, собственно, и формируют инфляцию. 🤑 Монетарная инфляция - это про деньги Если дене

🔥6💯32❤‍🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC270 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#юмор (хотя смешного тут мало) #инвестиции

custom 54609402613265926274😁32🤣2

24 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC326 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫥 Цена свидания #фанфакт РИАМО посчитали среднюю стоимость первого свидания в Москве - около 25 тысяч рублей на двоих. Иронично, что сетевое издание «портал Региональное информационное агентство Московской области (РИАМО)» рассчитывает цену свидания в Москве, ну да ладно В общем и целом, цифра красивая, заголовочная и почти бесполезная. Потому что самое интересное прячется в структуре расходов, а не в итоге. Дава

😁12🔥4🤝32❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ufinansist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Увлеченный Финансист” (@ufinansist), 932 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ufinansist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.