Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лягушкина нора

Channel

Лягушкина нора

@unhappypay

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,753subscribers

+195 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001775874651
TypeChannel
Username@unhappypay
DescriptionBloede d’hoine! ✨SW-0711-5612-6330✨ @unhappy_pay_bot предложка 🤡 https://boosty.to/unhappy_pay 🤙🏻 https://www.twitch.tv/unhappy_pay стримы 💀 https://taplink.cc/unhappy_pay остальные ссылки 🐍
Created26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/unhappypay

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,4656,7966,630.56 August 2026 — 6,558 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,558 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,557 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,545 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,540 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,535 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,534 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,512 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,502 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,498 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,493 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,489 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,486 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,465 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,725 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,796 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,794 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,786 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,769 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,767 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,758 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,755 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,754 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,752 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,753 subscribers6,7536 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,415–6,846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 23:176,753+1
1 Nov 2026, 19:396,752-2
29 Oct 2026, 10:476,754-1
26 Oct 2026, 19:316,755-3
24 Oct 2026, 03:476,758-9
20 Oct 2026, 17:216,767-2
17 Oct 2026, 14:386,769-17
14 Oct 2026, 11:446,786-8
10 Oct 2026, 13:566,794-2
4 Oct 2026, 21:026,796+71
25 Sept 2026, 08:006,725+260
16 Sept 2026, 16:396,465-21
12 Sept 2026, 09:196,486-3
8 Sept 2026, 14:006,489-4
2 Sept 2026, 23:466,493-5
30 Aug 2026, 15:256,498-4
27 Aug 2026, 10:136,502-10
24 Aug 2026, 01:336,512-22
20 Aug 2026, 00:086,534-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:236,535first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.6%
avg views ÷ 6,753 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,070
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held80 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total53,801
Reactions total1,454
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,900
Videos
≈2,430
Links
≈519

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 17s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,139 reactions across 80 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 603083540449879945784920.5%
❤78118.9%
custom 526524367996193035853312.9%
custom 52404505345691708383839.25%
custom 54674707934599161543668.84%
custom 52357289138119098163217.76%
🔥2255.44%
❤‍🔥2095.05%
custom 52199788778954617021273.07%
custom 53755839410067372631072.59%
💯791.91%
😱471.14%
😢360.87%
🤨330.797%
🫡130.314%
🎉60.145%
👏60.145%
😨60.145%
🤝60.145%
✍30.072%
2 further kinds30.072%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 80 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @unhappypay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 18:57 UTC774 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

бля скинула не то сначала 🐱 короче вот вам страшных ебак

custom 521997887789546170216

6 Nov 2026, 18:43 UTC821 views14 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

ну и классика 🐱

custom 524045053456917083814

6 Nov 2026, 18:38 UTC792 views35 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

жена номер 2 🐱

❤23custom 60308354044987994579🔥3

6 Nov 2026, 18:36 UTC786 views45 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🐱 мне никогда не стать такой же крутой, как она 🐱

custom 603083540449879945731❤8🔥6

6 Nov 2026, 18:35 UTC795 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

ну жена 🪑

❤19custom 60308354044987994574🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 18:34 UTC793 views33 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🐱🐱🐱 #thelegendofzelda

❤31custom 52357289138119098162

27 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,760 views71 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

мем про мое нынешнее состояние и кто всему виной 😔

❤54custom 546747079345991615414🤝3

27 Oct 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,940 views58 reactionsread 6 November 2026

причем у нас были уже предположения, что они походу начали работать вместе, потому что те приколы с основным компом и стримом, когда дис ебал мозги и стрим зависал было первым крупным звоночком

custom 526524367996193035854custom 54674707934599161544

27 Oct 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,960 views84 reactionsread 6 November 2026

позвонил мне сейчас чепух с уфанета такой и говорит : здравствуйте, а вы пользуетесь Яндекс Плюс, а мы тут недавно начали сотрудничество с Яндекс… ну и тут я поняла, почему блять последние пару месяцев инет ебучее говно, скорости по пизде идут и вообще Уфанет скатился в парашу за такие ебучие огромные бабки 🪑

custom 546747079345991615470custom 526524367996193035814

26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC≈2,020 views57 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ну там и мыш с тренером ахуели тоже 🌟

custom 521997887789546170254custom 54674707934599161543

26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC≈2,030 views57 reactionsread 6 November 2026

и ахуела с того, какой у меня прокачанный верх 😠

custom 603083540449879945757

26 Oct 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,990 views64 reactionsread 6 November 2026

сегодня я убила себя в зале

custom 603083540449879945751🫡13

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @unhappypay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CustomStories
@customstories · 37,229
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
KyDaNeSeTDbIM
@mult_ashki · 28,911
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 10 September 2026
Свежая Булдка
@buldj · 85,842
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
TheRudyGames
@therudygroup · 45,871
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
KotaMota Games
@kotamotaclub · 38,602
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 31 August 2026
Зио
@zio402 · 43,553
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
Майзенберг
@meizzenberg · 42,766
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
DeadP47
@deadp47gaymer · 149,436
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
ИнсайдерКэм
@youtubecam · 26,284
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лягушкина нора” (@unhappypay), 6,753 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unhappypay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.