National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 93 days, net -918. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,146–27,343 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 09:45
26,284
-5
6 Nov 2026, 11:25
26,289
-10
5 Nov 2026, 07:54
26,299
+1
4 Nov 2026, 05:55
26,298
-24
3 Nov 2026, 08:34
26,322
-6
2 Nov 2026, 10:47
26,328
-11
1 Nov 2026, 13:59
26,339
-3
31 Oct 2026, 14:57
26,342
-10
30 Oct 2026, 13:27
26,352
-23
29 Oct 2026, 14:48
26,375
-11
28 Oct 2026, 12:35
26,386
-22
27 Oct 2026, 10:36
26,408
-6
26 Oct 2026, 07:46
26,414
-9
25 Oct 2026, 10:40
26,423
-6
24 Oct 2026, 12:06
26,429
-6
23 Oct 2026, 10:55
26,435
+32
22 Oct 2026, 10:01
26,403
-25
21 Oct 2026, 00:50
26,428
+4
19 Oct 2026, 20:57
26,424
-36
18 Oct 2026, 17:30
26,460
first reading
Engagement
92 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
88.8%
avg views ÷ 26,284 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,300
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 92 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
92 (21 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
443,460
Reactions total
12,338
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 03:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,210
Videos
≈150
Links
≈1,790
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 22s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
54,860 reactions across 87 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5848253857959775691
39,021
71.1%
❤
8,700
15.9%
😢
4,515
8.23%
👎
1,426
2.60%
🔥
1,198
2.18%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59,374 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
114
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 92 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @youtubecam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (89.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👮♀️#Google и #Telegram были оштрафованы!
Постановлениями Таганского районного суда города Москвы 3 ноября 2026 года Гугл ЛЛС и Telegram Messenger Inc. признаны виновными в совершении административных правонарушений, предусмотренных ч. 2 ст. 13.41 КоАП РФ.
Суд назначил каждому наказание в виде административного штрафа в размере 3 800 000 рублей.
Интересно, до каких сумм могут дойти эти не выплаченные штрафы…🤔
Инс…
👮♀️Московский суд запретил #Apple судиться с VK в США!
Арбитражный суд Москвы запретил Apple, Apple Distribution International, «Эппл Рус» и их представителям продолжать судебное разбирательство против VK на территории США. В течение семи дней компании должны отозвать иск, следует из постановления.
Спор связан с удалением приложений российского холдинга из магазина App Store. VK через суд потребовала вернуть прило…
👮♀️Власти обсудят отключение связи для "серых" смартфонов!
Власти обсуждают обязательную регистрацию "серых" смартфонов, без которой их не будут обслуживать в сетях связи.
Устройств, ввезенных до апреля 2027 года, это не коснется.
Ритейлеры называют меру ударом по черному рынку.
Полная статья ТУТ.
Не зарегал на себя телефон через Госуслуги - пока…🫠
ИнсайдерКэм
👮♀️Использование VPN стали учитывать при обосновании ареста!
Использование VPN и исчезающих сообщений в мессенджерах стали выступать в качестве аргумента следствия при обосновании ходатайства о заключении под стражу. Об этом в беседе с "Фонтанкой" 27 октября заявила член СПЧ Ева Меркачева.
По ее словам, традиционно следствие обосновывает необходимость заключения под стражу тяжестью предполагаемого преступления, ри…
👮♀️#Apple и #Microsoft обязаны хранить данные жителей РФ!
Apple и Microsoft теперь обязаны хранить переписки, аудио- и видеосообщения пользователей и предоставлять их российским спецслужбам.
Если компании откажутся выполнять требования, Роскомнадзор сможет добиваться блокировки их сервисов в России.
Ещё 2 октября РКН внёс Apple и Microsoft в реестр организаторов распространения информации (ОРИ). Теперь компании д…
👮♀️Минцифры может ввести лимит на зарубежный трафик!
Минцифры готовит очередные меры в рамках готовящейся реформы отрасли связи. Среди них — предложение пропускать весь трафик с зарубежных доменов через технические средства противодействия угрозам (ТСПУ) и ограничивать его объем для российских пользователей. Эксперты указывают на серьезные технологические сложности: отделить зарубежный трафик от российского крайне …
👮♀️РКН опроверг информацию о запрете интернета до 14 лет!
Роскомнадзор опроверг сообщения об инициативе ведомства о запрете детям до 14 лет сидеть в интернете.
Ранее в Telegram-каналах писали, что Роскомнадзор предложил сократить время пребывания в интернете для детей младше 14 лет. Также сообщалось, что ведомство направило в комитет ГД по информационной политике законопроект, предусматривающий обязательную иденти…
👮♀️В Госдуме выделили основные проблемы защиты детей в интернете!
Роскомнадзор предложил запретить детям до 14 лет сидеть в интернете и обязать соцсети проверять их возраст.
Об этом представитель ведомства сообщила на заседании комитета Госдумы по информационной политике, пишут "Ведомости".
По мнению председателя комитета Госдумы по защите семьи Нины Останиной, одних запретов недостаточно - они могут вызвать у де…
❌В Москве ограничили работу интернета 27-29 октября!
В Москве в пределах Третьего транспортного кольца 27-29 октября могут быть введены временные ограничения на работу мобильного интернета.
Мера связана с обеспечением безопасности во время проведения восьмого саммита глав государств и правительств стран - участниц Форума стран - экспортёров газа (ФСЭГ) и третьего саммита Россия-Африка.
Будут доступны наиболее вост…
🎬Роскачество назвало самую быструю видеоплатформу!
"VK Видео" стал самой быстрой видеоплатформой по итоговой готовности к публикации коротких видео. Об этом говорится в исследовании Роскачества, которое есть в распоряжении ТАСС.
Центр цифровой экспертизы Роскачества сравнил скорость трех популярных видеоплатформ в России - "VK Видео", YouTube и Rutube. Для проверки скорости эксперты использовали цифровой анализатор…
👮♀️ВК блогершу оштрафовали за новость про 2018 год о Telegram!
Блогершу обвинили в "распространении фейков про РКН" из-за старой новости про снятие блокировки с Telegram.
Как узнали "Осторожно, новости", в июне 38-летняя блогерша Екатерина К. с 45 тыс. подписчиками во "ВКонтакте" и 15 тыс. подписчиками в Telegram опубликовала скриншот сообщения Роскомнадзора от 2018 года, в котором ведомство объявило о снятии огра…
👮♀️Ивана Золо задержали прямо на концерте!
"Дорогие друзья, сегодня произошла неприятная ситуация , на концерте в Донецке Когда-то в 2022 году я купил футболку в магазине хип-хоп шоп, снял с ней видео, а сейчас оказалось что она была с запрещенной символикой сатанизма, я лично об этом не знал. Теперь же мне сказали, что было нарушение. Не знание закона - не освобождает от ответственности, поэтому я полностью призна…
👎352custom 5848253857959775691176🔥30❤22
Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @youtubecam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@youtubecam edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 October 2026
Most recent edit
17 October 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Jim Gold 👑 @JimGold1 · 58,849 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 29 August 2026
Майзенберг @meizzenberg · 42,766 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Amoral @amoral2288 · 67,615 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
SHAPKA @rushizik · 132,738 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Антиблогер @antibloger_official · 19,126 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 September 2026
Planya Ch @planyach · 22,090 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
Зио @zio402 · 43,553 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
Кель` @GosdepSHA · 118,988 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
Мэмисон (поиск мемов) @memsearch · 47,413 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
Каргас @kargacc · 97,558 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026
DeadP47 @deadp47gaymer · 149,436 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Зорген — и точка💊 [LanceR Hard] @lancertgme · 22,193 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 28 September 2026
Стерлитамак | Новости | Происшествия @Sterlitamak_crazy · 26,280 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 September 2026
Берлога BVS @bvsyt · 73,319 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
Dragology⚡️ @dragology · 59,990 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Сумкария @sumochkin_production · 22,036 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
FeelBro @FeeelBro · 49,818 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Свежая Булдка @buldj · 85,842 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИнсайдерКэм” (@youtubecam), 26,284 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youtubecam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.