Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Planya Ch

Channel

Planya Ch

@planyach

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,250subscribers

-157 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781243942
TypeChannel
Username@planyach
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/planyach

Growth

22,25022,43422,3427 August 2026 — 22,407 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,408 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,433 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,434 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,419 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,423 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,418 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,409 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,413 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,393 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,368 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,377 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,379 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,374 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,375 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,344 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,331 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,316 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,317 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,312 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,315 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,326 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,325 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,309 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,297 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,284 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,270 subscribers7 September 2026 — 22,250 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 31 days, net -157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,222–22,462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 07:3922,250-20
4 Sept 2026, 11:1622,270-14
2 Sept 2026, 23:1422,284-13
1 Sept 2026, 22:3622,297-12
31 Aug 2026, 20:2422,309-16
30 Aug 2026, 18:3522,325-1
29 Aug 2026, 16:2722,326+11
28 Aug 2026, 16:1122,315+3
27 Aug 2026, 15:1222,312-5
26 Aug 2026, 17:5322,317+1
25 Aug 2026, 19:3722,316-15
24 Aug 2026, 16:2322,331-13
22 Aug 2026, 22:5522,344-31
21 Aug 2026, 10:1622,375+1
20 Aug 2026, 08:3422,374-5
19 Aug 2026, 10:3522,379+2
18 Aug 2026, 14:0422,377+9
17 Aug 2026, 10:3522,368-25
15 Aug 2026, 20:2722,393-20
14 Aug 2026, 13:1722,413first reading

Engagement

249 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.5%
avg views ÷ 22,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,670
187 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
192
of 249 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held249 (5 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total1,433,610
Reactions total69,741
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 25s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

85,812 reactions across 244 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27,41732.0%
🤡16,43419.2%
😁16,27219.0%
🗿13,71416.0%
🔥11,97514.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 244 of the 249 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85,812 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 249 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,806
across the posts below
Posts paid on
51
of 244 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
1,030
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @planyach. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 249 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 07:46 UTC≈4,940 views437 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

😭 Алексей…

237🗿123🤡38😁24🔥15

3 Sept 2026, 06:16 UTC≈5,590 views392 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Video

В Токио нашли шаурмичную, которая выглядит так, будто её перенесли туда прямиком из СНГ: внутри «Alo Kebab» играет русский кальянный рэп, а на вывеске по-русски написано «Шаурма». Если лететь в Японию, то только ради этой хрючевальни 👤 🫡

211🤡84🔥77😁19🗿1

3 Sept 2026, 03:42 UTC≈5,940 views387 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Знаешь чувство, будто забуксовала? Где-то свернула не туда и путь стал замысловат И ты ходишь кругами, подбирая слова Сознавая: всё исправить можно, лишь вернувшись назад.

🗿14593😁75🤡52🔥22

2 Sept 2026, 20:31 UTC≈6,350 views356 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

👤 Serious Samax

🤡167🗿83🔥53😁2825

2 Sept 2026, 20:02 UTC≈6,380 views344 reactions10 Starsread 3 September 2026

Пора родной, пора. https://youtu.be/cdbwB7XsQoU?si=dJpJBUlpbfXhd1Jy

189🔥70🗿61😁16🤡8

2 Sept 2026, 19:58 UTC≈6,230 views347 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Чт : Видосы 19:10 🥰 Пт : Смотрим что то с Флином и Килфи 19:10 🤫 Вскр : Готика 12:30 🕧 Все время: Мск 😑

🤡208😁5352🔥31🗿3

2 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC≈6,300 views422 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Да блять.

😁209🗿9175🤡27🔥20

2 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC≈6,300 views407 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Планя только вернулась, пошла жара. Люблю нашего гремлина. В каждой бочке затычка. 👤 Nik2006

198😁131🗿37🤡24🔥17

2 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTC≈6,410 views500 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥246😁196🤡25🗿1815

2 Sept 2026, 17:03 UTC≈6,460 views492 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Хватит меня позорить перед миром, я не тетя, я не гоблинша! 😡

😁283🗿170🤡1813🔥8

2 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈6,550 views474 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Лол. Вот бы с ними заколабиться и в хои4 сыграть.

280🔥84🗿50🤡31😁29

Showing the 12 most recent of 249 posts we hold for @planyach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTCAnonymous Poll2,500 voters approx.

Вы школьник

  1. Да12%
  2. Нет88%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTCAnonymous Poll1,900 voters approx.

Вы разочарованы в ГТА6?

  1. Да10%
  2. Нет28%
  3. Мне плевать на игру71%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTCAnonymous Poll1,210 voters approx.

Что слушаете?

  1. Я фанат нейротреков3%
  2. Я люблю только песни от живых людей.60%
  3. У меня нет вкуса, слушаю все.37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 249 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tiny Bunny News🐰
@TinyBunny_official · 97,426
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 August 2026
DeadP47
@deadp47gaymer · 151,528
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
KotaMota Games
@kotamotaclub · 38,237
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 31 August 2026
Майзенберг
@meizzenberg · 42,014
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Бэбэй
@bebeychick · 91,458
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026
FeelBro
@FeeelBro · 48,710
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Каргас
@kargacc · 99,761
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Planya Ch” (@planyach), 22,250 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/planyach.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.