Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Planya Ch

Channel

Planya Ch

@planyach

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,069subscribers

-338 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781243942
TypeChannel
Username@planyach
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held47
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/planyach

Topic

Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,03522,43422,234.57 August 2026 — 22,407 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,408 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,433 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,434 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,419 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,423 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,418 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,409 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,413 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,393 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,368 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,377 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,379 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,374 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,375 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,344 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,331 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,316 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,317 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,312 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,315 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,326 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,325 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,309 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,297 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,284 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,270 subscribers7 September 2026 — 22,250 subscribers10 September 2026 — 22,224 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,186 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,193 subscribers16 September 2026 — 22,165 subscribers18 September 2026 — 22,154 subscribers2 October 2026 — 22,080 subscribers7 October 2026 — 22,035 subscribers11 October 2026 — 22,107 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,098 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,100 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,089 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,093 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,091 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,096 subscribers21 October 2026 — 22,090 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,079 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,084 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,075 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,069 subscribers22,0697 August 202625 October 2026
47 measurements spanning 79 days, net -338. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,975–22,494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 10:5522,069-6
24 Oct 2026, 14:0822,075-9
23 Oct 2026, 15:3622,084+5
22 Oct 2026, 16:2722,079-11
21 Oct 2026, 08:3822,090-6
20 Oct 2026, 08:3122,096+5
19 Oct 2026, 06:2622,091-2
17 Oct 2026, 06:2822,093+4
16 Oct 2026, 06:0722,089-11
15 Oct 2026, 07:1922,100+2
14 Oct 2026, 02:5122,098-9
11 Oct 2026, 12:5922,107+72
7 Oct 2026, 03:5822,035-45
2 Oct 2026, 05:2022,080-74
18 Sept 2026, 13:4222,154-11
16 Sept 2026, 04:4122,165-28
14 Sept 2026, 08:4022,193+7
12 Sept 2026, 15:1422,186-38
10 Sept 2026, 10:3822,224-26
7 Sept 2026, 07:3922,250first reading

Engagement

361 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.7%
avg views ÷ 22,069 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,100
99 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 361 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held361 (5 August 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total802,210
Reactions total29,293
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 23:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43m 33s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

119,152 reactions across 355 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤36,49130.6%
😁24,91120.9%
🤡22,30618.7%
🗿18,12915.2%
🔥17,31514.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 355 of the 361 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119,152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 361 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,834
across the posts below
Posts paid on
61
of 355 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1,030
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @planyach. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 361 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2026, 20:32 UTC≈3,860 views70 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

Вайбкодер с помощью GPT-6 создал бесплатную копию Adobe Photoshop. На токены ушло $2000, но на выходе - полноценный продукт, который он обещает оставить бесплатным на всегда. Помянем Adobe. 👤 Andrei Gorchenok

❤44😁17🤡9

12 Oct 2026, 19:24 UTC≈4,770 views96 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Работа кипит. А у вас как дела?

❤84🤡12

12 Oct 2026, 19:11 UTC≈4,420 views76 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Forwarded from @solek_ytPhoto

ОТ ВАС ЭТО СКРЫВАЛИ!!!!! https://youtu.be/v54XN4ugGn4 https://youtu.be/v54XN4ugGn4 https://youtu.be/v54XN4ugGn4

❤54🤡10🔥6🗿5😁1

12 Oct 2026, 16:33 UTC≈5,750 views172 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Шоукейс нового костюма для модели Плани ❤️ 👤 Артём_🔨асфрог🤙 (источник: "✧ newmoonSHIRA ✧")

❤144🤡15🔥9😁4

12 Oct 2026, 07:38 UTC≈6,920 views263 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

С понедельником кста.

❤214🤡25🔥20🗿4

12 Oct 2026, 07:17 UTC≈6,930 views258 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

Планя а чё ты не рассказываешь что у тебя канал на Ютубе на Американскую аудиторию есть , мы бы подписались или ты нас стесняешься?😏 👤 Jay Evgeniy

😁196❤37🤡22🗿3

12 Oct 2026, 02:09 UTC≈7,400 views229 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Спите. Даже в 5 утра, все они видят. Ужас просто.

🗿146❤62🤡21

12 Oct 2026, 02:06 UTC≈7,250 views199 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

Ну ты угораешь? Откуда вы с ней знакомы то… Может и с мышью?! Везде ты. Все верно Братишкин сказал, в каждой бочке. 👤 АрTMix98

🗿122🔥42🤡18❤17

11 Oct 2026, 16:09 UTC≈7,600 views199 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Gremlin de Halloween: la Dama de la Muerte. 👤 NVD!

❤159🗿18🤡13🔥9

11 Oct 2026, 12:48 UTC≈7,810 views253 reactions1 Starread 12 October 2026
Photo

Плани не бывает много 👤 Xenter (источник: "Meelo")

❤205🔥28😁9🤡8🗿3

11 Oct 2026, 09:37 UTC≈7,850 views137 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Такс, сейчас подрублю стрим. Будет готика. Постараемся за два стрима ее уже добить. А то рыцари Гвиневры, научили нас всегда добивать.

❤110🤡14🗿13

10 Oct 2026, 22:33 UTC≈8,220 views226 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

😠 👤 Hanz

❤121🗿55🤡31😁19

Showing the 12 most recent of 361 posts we hold for @planyach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@planyach edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 October 2026
Most recent edit
7 October 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Oct 2026, 17:59 UTCAnonymous Poll1,720 voters approx.

Добиваем Готику? Или начинаем другую игру?

  1. Нет31%
  2. Да69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTCAnonymous Poll2,500 voters approx.

Вы школьник

  1. Да12%
  2. Нет88%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTCAnonymous Poll1,900 voters approx.

Вы разочарованы в ГТА6?

  1. Да10%
  2. Нет28%
  3. Мне плевать на игру71%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTCAnonymous Poll1,210 voters approx.

Что слушаете?

  1. Я фанат нейротреков3%
  2. Я люблю только песни от живых людей.60%
  3. У меня нет вкуса, слушаю все.37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 361 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Хиган
@higanbanban · 4,208
#1
Зорген — и точка💊 [LanceR Hard]
@lancertgme · 20,535
#2
T2x2
@t2xtwitch · 327,341
#3
KotaMota Games
@kotamotaclub · 38,557
#4
Гаремник Милирей
@miliraybrick · 711
#5
АниЛибрия ⚡️ Аниме новости
@anilibria · 188,921
#6
mizukkka 🤍
@mizukkka · 789
#7
Tiny Bunny News🐰
@TinyBunny_official · 94,415
#8
Бэбэй
@bebeychick · 90,717
#9
Charlotte ch
@Charlottech2 · 704 (as read 21 September 2026)
#10
Каргас
@kargacc · 98,091
#11
Майзенберг
@meizzenberg · 42,365
#12
Зио
@zio402 · 44,111
#13
Двач
@dvachannel · 971,654
#14
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,121,155
#15
Подвал Стинта
@thestint · 259,284
#16
Кристина Шерман | Меняю голос как перчатки
@trixie_vox · 22,218
#17
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 712,410
#18
Свежая Булдка
@buldj · 85,928
#19
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 416,715
#20
Вестник Шевцова
@jolynews · 207,288
#21
ИнсайдерКэм
@youtubecam · 26,423
#22
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 488,630
#23
Игорь Линк
@IgorLinkChannel · 72,657
#24
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 268,186
#25
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 181,549
#26
Что-то не так с Севериной Содой
@SeverinaSodaVtuber · 6,483
#27
Melody Note
@meowlody_note · 3,784
#28
ГЕЙмерское сообщество
@GAYming_soobshestvo · 4,524
#29
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 324,030
#30
Sati Akura
@sati_akura · 8,972
#31
nerds
@nerds · 413,557
#32
4ch
@why4ch · 1,027,949
#33
RuGG. Скандалы, игры, повесточка
@ggscg_tg · 13,513
#34
Кель`
@GosdepSHA · 119,325
#35
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 908,170
#36
Ифритик ест блинчик
@ifrit_fri · 1,811 (as read 21 September 2026)
#37
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,808
#38
Абу
@abuwtf · 277,210
#39
FFT
@ffttelega · 44,768
#40
Toka Paint
@tokacomics · 30,370
#41
SimpDungeon☠️
@grpzdc · 176,573
#42
AKIDA
@akidawho · 1,780
#43
Lazu-tan
@lazu_live · 297
#44
Лягушачий Флуд Froggy Tyan
@froggyvtube · 466
#45
Мэмисон (поиск мемов)
@memsearch · 47,482
#46
IXBT Games | Короче
@ixbtgames · 68,122
#47
Объективные и неподкупные мемы
@igorlinkmemes · 15,650
#48
Quiet boy I have UWUTISM 🤫
@bnuy4 · 7,753
#49
КультасLIVE
@kultas_live · 31,713
#50
Kaibutsu
@kaibutsuvtp · 814
#51
Alina Rin 🐟
@welcome2RHK · 60,886
#52
Бладсикер 2.0
@bIoodsiker · 211,656
#53
MemeBlog
@memeblogteam · 26,009
#54
˖ ⊹ moereira
@moereira · 2,343
#55
Подвал Мишки
@podvalmishki · 1,614
#56
AlexstraWho [VTuber]
@alexstrastudios · 1,555
#57
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,620
#58
Логово Вверху (Братишкин)
@nebudetafk · 200,505
#59
Мирин
@by_mirin · 1,645
#60
берлога мореки 🐻🍯
@itsmoriko · 675
#61
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,528
#62
Melo
@soundmelo · 1,937
#63
StopGame.ru
@stopgameru · 82,576
#64
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,124
#65
Винди31🤝
@windy31room · 534,769
#66
hypewave
@hypewave · 55,363
#67

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Кристина Шерман | Меняю голос как перчатки
@trixie_vox · 22,218
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
Tiny Bunny News🐰
@TinyBunny_official · 94,415
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 August 2026
Зорген — и точка💊 [LanceR Hard]
@lancertgme · 20,535
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 28 September 2026
DeadP47
@deadp47gaymer · 150,312
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
KotaMota Games
@kotamotaclub · 38,557
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 31 August 2026
Майзенберг
@meizzenberg · 42,365
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
ИнсайдерКэм
@youtubecam · 26,423
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026
Анимэр
@merismine · 23,655
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 September 2026
Бэбэй
@bebeychick · 90,717
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026
Милшу
@milshoonya · 20,040
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 September 2026
FeelBro
@FeeelBro · 49,515
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Каргас
@kargacc · 98,091
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Planya Ch” (@planyach), 22,069 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/planyach.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.