Победа визуальной новеллы «Зайчик» на «Игропроме 2026» в номинации «Лучшее игрочтиво».
❤373🤣95custom 547201029471890412167custom 520201878924743021236💩22🔥11❤🔥8👏5

Channel
@TinyBunny_official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
96,759subscribers
-4,052 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001436735369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TinyBunny_official |
| Description | Официальный канал визуальной новеллы - "Зайчик / Tiny Bunny". Здесь публикуются самые актуальные новости игры. 🎮 Официальный сайт игры (все ссылки там): https://tinybunnyhorror.com/ Официальный TikTok: @TinyBunny_official |
| Created | 12 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TinyBunny_official |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 96,759 | -167 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 96,926 | -85 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 97,011 | -69 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 97,080 | -102 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 97,182 | -244 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 97,426 | -282 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 97,708 | -169 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 97,877 | -95 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 97,972 | -128 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 98,100 | -132 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 98,232 | -91 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 98,323 | -93 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 98,416 | -152 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 98,568 | -99 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 98,667 | -134 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 98,801 | -108 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 98,909 | -140 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 99,049 | -151 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 99,200 | -102 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 99,302 | first reading |
56 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (16 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 816,300 |
| Reactions total | 19,547 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 22:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48,411 reactions across 56 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26,416 | 54.6% | |
| custom 5472010294718904121 | 6,109 | 12.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3,478 | 7.18% | |
| custom 5202018789247430212 | 3,459 | 7.15% | |
| 🔥 | 1,894 | 3.91% | |
| 💩 | 1,886 | 3.90% | |
| 💘 | 1,102 | 2.28% | |
| 💋 | 593 | 1.22% | |
| 🤩 | 482 | 0.996% | |
| 😢 | 474 | 0.979% | |
| 👍 | 394 | 0.814% | |
| 🥰 | 374 | 0.773% | |
| 🤣 | 372 | 0.768% | |
| 😭 | 347 | 0.717% | |
| 👎 | 252 | 0.521% | |
| 🍓 | 203 | 0.419% | |
| 🙏 | 136 | 0.281% | |
| 😁 | 74 | 0.153% | |
| ⚡ | 50 | 0.103% | |
| 👏 | 44 | 0.091% | |
| 19 further kinds | 272 | 0.562% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,411 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Победа визуальной новеллы «Зайчик» на «Игропроме 2026» в номинации «Лучшее игрочтиво».
❤373🤣95custom 547201029471890412167custom 520201878924743021236💩22🔥11❤🔥8👏5
Скидка 30% на игру Зайчик, в честь получения награды видеигровой премии "Наш Игропром 2026" в номинации "Игрочтиво". Скидка продлится до 26 сентября 🐰 🎮 Игра — 399р. 279 р. 🎶 Саундтрек — 165р. 115 р. 📘 Манга «Любовь, смерть и клубника» продаётся только в Steam. В основном для зарубежных аккаунтов (если бумага не вариант). Где забирать: 🐰 в Steam. Если умеете обходить жизненные квесты с оплатой. 🦊 у нас на сайте. Сп…
💘193❤104custom 520201878924743021252custom 547201029471890412121💩12🔥6👍5👎3
Игропром 2026. Зайчик. Победа!!! На «Игропроме 2026» игра взяла награду в номинации «Лучшее игрочтиво». Для визуальной новеллы это довольно серьёзное достижение. Жанр часто воспринимают как «книжку с картинками» или «не совсем игру». В нём нет боёвки, нет открытого мира или прокачки. Единственное, что есть это история. И то, как её рассказывают. Поэтому когда визуальную новеллу отмечают именно за нарратив, становит…
❤374❤🔥77custom 520201878924743021265💩28custom 547201029471890412113🔥12👾5💘5
Началась церемония награждения: «НАШ ИГРОПРОМ 2026». Зайчик попал в номинанты. 😎 Экспертное жюри выставило свои оценки, народное голосование определило фаворитов. Ждём результата. Как думаете, сможет "Зайчик" взять какую-нибудь номинацию? Включайте прямую трансляцию. 👇 P.S. Найди на фото значок по Зайчику
❤229custom 520201878924743021241custom 547201029471890412128💩15🔥8❤🔥4🍓4💘3
Вы с нами? Подключайтесь! VK Live РУТУБ
❤206💩54👍20custom 520201878924743021217custom 547201029471890412110⚡7🔥7🍓4
Привет с «Игропрома»
❤🔥375custom 5472010294718904121183❤62👍43custom 520201878924743021221💩11🍓7💋4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤218custom 547201029471890412138👍35💘28custom 520201878924743021211💩6❤🔥4🔥4
Талант аудитории «Зайчика» и ваши истории конечно поражают! А, может, действительно пора вспомнить один из первых (если не самый первый) фан-треков по игре? "На момент создания мной этой песни вышло лишь два эпизода, которые я посмотрел у Куплинова и так проникся этим прохождением и вайбом того, что тогда происходило в игре, что за ночь сочинил этот трек. А наутро, пока ехал в электричке на работу - уснул, проехал с…
❤314❤🔥66custom 520201878924743021233🔥22💩16custom 547201029471890412112👍7⚡3
🎮 НАСТОЯЩЕЕ И БУДУЩЕЕ ВИДЕОИГР В РОССИИ «ИГРЫ-2» — второй сезон документального сериала «ИСТОРИЯ РОССИЙСКИХ КОМПЬЮТЕРНЫХ ИГР» выйдет в Okko 23 сентября! Первый сезон исследовал становление отрасли. Второй — о настоящем и будущем геймдева. Шесть серий, шесть ключевых профессий и откровенные интервью с теми, кто создаёт игры сегодня. Как устроена разработка? Как переживать провалы? И можно ли сделать культовую игру у…
❤224💩55custom 520201878924743021234😁17custom 547201029471890412112❤🔥7👍7💘3
Про «Зайчика» и другие российские игры сняли документальный фильм «Игры-2» Выйдет 23 сентября на Okko.
❤401👍90custom 520201878924743021243🤣28💩20❤🔥9custom 54720102947189041216💘4
Стенд «Зайчика» на прошедшем фестивале АниматиКон.
❤🔥436❤176custom 547201029471890412185💩33custom 520201878924743021222🔥8🤩5💋3
Смотрим продолжение стрима вместе с Папичем?
❤664🤣152👎68custom 520201878924743021258💩20custom 547201029471890412120❤🔥8👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @TinyBunny_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@TinyBunny_official edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TinyBunny_official named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Tiny Bunny |
|---|---|
| Description | video game |
| X / Twitter | @TinyBunnyVN |
| Official site | https://tinybunnyhorror.com/ |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tiny Bunny News🐰” (@TinyBunny_official), 96,759 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TinyBunny_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.