Предложка - @KultasPredloBot
Личка (для женщин и фембоев) - @Kulthas
Теперь ТОЧНО официальный канал Культаса.
Идентификатор блогера - https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673b690d6afad41667c99faf®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
5 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,580–31,772 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 21:39
31,645
+5
15 Sept 2026, 21:19
31,640
+11
14 Sept 2026, 02:19
31,629
+13
12 Sept 2026, 07:55
31,616
+14
10 Sept 2026, 05:15
31,602
-45
6 Sept 2026, 21:36
31,647
-14
4 Sept 2026, 05:01
31,661
+7
2 Sept 2026, 21:25
31,654
-12
1 Sept 2026, 16:22
31,666
-4
31 Aug 2026, 15:53
31,670
+5
30 Aug 2026, 18:34
31,665
-6
28 Aug 2026, 18:58
31,671
+3
27 Aug 2026, 16:38
31,668
-20
26 Aug 2026, 20:06
31,688
-10
25 Aug 2026, 18:58
31,698
-5
24 Aug 2026, 20:57
31,703
-5
23 Aug 2026, 04:16
31,708
-1
21 Aug 2026, 16:36
31,709
+5
20 Aug 2026, 17:54
31,704
+11
19 Aug 2026, 15:42
31,693
first reading
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
51.4%
avg views ÷ 31,645 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,300
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
81 (17 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
634,000
Reactions total
16,006
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 07:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,570
Videos
≈100
Links
≈730
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 14s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
39,848 reactions across 81 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,492
21.3%
😁
8,197
20.6%
🤣
7,598
19.1%
❤🔥
2,194
5.51%
🌚
2,113
5.30%
👍
1,758
4.41%
🔥
1,621
4.07%
🤯
1,217
3.05%
🎉
1,063
2.67%
🤡
845
2.12%
🥰
711
1.78%
😱
642
1.61%
😢
577
1.45%
⚡
572
1.44%
💔
430
1.08%
💯
370
0.929%
🤔
353
0.886%
🍌
272
0.683%
🤩
156
0.391%
💩
153
0.384%
11 further kinds
514
1.29%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39,848 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Только читая как Bungie предположительно воскрешают Дестини 2 (достают из загашника и оптимизируют старый контент, про разработку нового формулировка крайне мутная и ничего не обещающая) спустя 3 месяца после увольнений и того как Марафон с причмоком отсосал,...
...только ТОГДА Дестиниеб может почувствовать сотую долю эйфории ХОТСоеба спустя 6 лет.
Я прошел Вульверину и заставил вас смотреть на это. А теперь смотрите последнее слово по нему, после чего об игре благополучно все забудут.
https://youtu.be/da73uwrJuyc
Ну по впечатлениям от 2/3 Росомахи сдается что хейт был не заслужен, конечно. Как и любые другие эмоции - у игры личности - хуй, и уникальности - писенька. От предсказуемой брейнд-дед истории, до боевки без глубины, чисто кнопочки понажимать, мозг не задействуя - иногда прикольно выглядит, но только и всего. Через неделю уже все забудут что этот самый эксклюзив Сони в истории существовал вообще. Завтра допройдем коне…
От Bloomberg в лице Шраера поступила ИНСАЙДЕРСКАЯ инфа, что Кодзиму выперли по, в целом, первым приходящим на ум причинам:
>Выход за бюджет и дедлайны, при том что до релиза PHYSINT еще годы
>Проекции прибыльности не удовлетворительные
>Также отмечается, что большинство лоялистов Кодзимы в Sony больше не работают
На первый взгляд, понять можно (не понятно, почему Шраер не вещал о обо всем этом 3 месяца назад, когда…
За последние сутки Sony растеряли больше репутации чем за весь последний год, и похоже, что на следующей неделе с выходом Вульверины лучше нихрена не станет... смотрим!
https://youtu.be/hlETBaB5_Y8
Мы дожили до эпохи когда даже IGN ставит мейнлайновому эксклюзиву PlayStation ниже 7. Худшие оценки Insomniac за последние 10 лет по всем фронтам. Походу, точно надо подрубать во вторник.
🤯353😁128🤔18👏12❤5🤡2👍1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @kultas_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы @kinopoisk · 806,604#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Коммандер @ilya_commander · 48,347 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
ЧЁРНЫЙ КАБИНЕТ @cabinetblack1 · 22,698 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
Вестник Чака @tele_chuck · 33,662 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
CustomStories @customstories · 37,387 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
MovieChannel @movie7channel · 22,156 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Каргас @kargacc · 99,307 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026
James Alone Official Entertainment System @jamesaloneteam · 38,108 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Свежая Булдка @buldj · 86,022 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
Бэбэй @bebeychick · 91,213 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026
Evoice Erebus говорит @evoiceerebus · 33,282 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
DeadP47 @deadp47gaymer · 151,336 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Terl Kabot official @TERLKABOT_official · 43,888 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Planya Ch @planyach · 22,154 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
Poleznyibes Батины Новости @batyanews · 58,223 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
SWEROK - Звёздные Войны @swerok · 23,787 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Храм Жубана @zhubanoir · 34,348 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Грег @gregjgeek · 23,220 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
GEO @GEOSHOW · 77,701 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Кино Огонь @kinoogon_official · 26,908 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Японец Коки @yaponetsukoki · 22,765 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
КШИШТОВСКИЙ @kshishtovsky · 25,442 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КультасLIVE” (@kultas_live), 31,645 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kultas_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.