Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
46 measurements spanning 78 days, net +179. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,434–24,133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Oct 2026, 22:55
23,706
+6
22 Oct 2026, 20:41
23,700
+5
21 Oct 2026, 18:50
23,695
-7
20 Oct 2026, 12:49
23,702
+1
19 Oct 2026, 13:48
23,701
-3
18 Oct 2026, 16:56
23,704
-2
17 Oct 2026, 19:40
23,706
-3
16 Oct 2026, 19:49
23,709
-4
15 Oct 2026, 19:18
23,713
-1
14 Oct 2026, 19:40
23,714
-6
13 Oct 2026, 09:16
23,720
-20
9 Oct 2026, 04:01
23,740
-21
4 Oct 2026, 13:58
23,761
+10
26 Sept 2026, 10:21
23,751
-36
17 Sept 2026, 14:40
23,787
-26
15 Sept 2026, 12:41
23,813
-8
13 Sept 2026, 19:58
23,821
-41
11 Sept 2026, 23:00
23,862
-190
9 Sept 2026, 16:41
24,052
+142
6 Sept 2026, 08:21
23,910
first reading
Engagement
106 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.8%
avg views ÷ 23,706 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,430
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 106 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held
106 (21 July 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total
292,340
Reactions total
8,270
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 10:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,210
Videos
≈135
Links
≈1,440
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27,897 reactions across 105 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11,552
41.4%
🔥
7,698
27.6%
👍
4,026
14.4%
🤔
897
3.22%
💩
808
2.90%
😱
707
2.53%
😢
598
2.14%
👏
559
2.00%
👀
456
1.63%
👎
346
1.24%
🎃
122
0.437%
🤬
61
0.219%
👻
59
0.211%
🦄
5
0.018%
😡
3
0.011%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 106 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,897 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
117
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 105 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @swerok. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 106 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Новый фильм «Звёздный истребитель» c Райаном Гослингом стоил $226 млн 💵
Об этом написало издание Forbes. Важно понимать, что под этой суммой подразумеваются только производственные затраты, то есть съёмки и зарплаты всех причастных к ним. Итоговый бюджет может быть больше в два раза из-за маркетинга и прочих дополнительных трат.
Также Forbes сообщили, что эта сумма превышает затраты на «Пробуждение силы» за тот же …
Electronic Arts подтвердила разработку «Star Wars: Battlefront 3» ⚡️
Компания указала об этом во внутренних документах, в которых значится, что студии DICE и Respawn работают над новой игрой. Также информацию подтвердило издание Variety. Так что теперь уже точно - разработка началась!
⚡️SWEROK - Звёздные Войны
СЛУХ: Разработка «Star Wars: Battlefront 3» передана студиям Respawn и DICE 🤔
Не успели мы с вами узнать, что Lucasfilm Games хотят возобновить разработку третьей части «Battlefront», как Джо Браммер, продюсер инди-хита Wardogs и глава студии Bulkhead, заявил, что игрой отныне занимается всё та же студия DICE (разработчики прошлых частей) при поддержке Respawn Entertainment (авторы серии игр про Кэла Кестиса).
Такж…
Lucasfilm Games хотят возобновить разработку «Star Wars: Battlefront 3» 😱
По словам инсайдера Джеффа Грабба, компания ведёт переговоры со студиями DICE (Разработчики прошлых частей) и Bungie (Destiny 2, Marathon) о разработке третьей части легендарной игры.
Третья игра в серии Battlefront так и не вышла: оригинальная игра в конце 2000-х была отменена, а DICE отошла от серии после выпуска популярной Battlefront 2 в …
Разработка фильма Тайки Вайтити по «Звёздным войнам» заморожена 🥶
Об этом рассказал сам Вайтити на интервью по продвижению своего нового фильма «Клара и солнце». Режиссёр сказал, что не станет томить фанатов туманным ответом, а потому ответит напрямую - «Я больше не работаю над картиной». Разработка пока отложена, но вряд ли она возобновится.
Проект был анонсирован в 2020-м году, но за пять лет так и не появилось н…
Ещё один отменённый сериал по «Звёздным войнам» от режиссёра «Человека-паука»!? 🔥
Недавно стало известно, что первый фильм новой трилогии «Звёздных войн» снимет Джон Уоттс, режиссёр трилогии «Человека-паука» с Томом Холландом и сериала «Star Wars: Skeleton Crew». Но также выяснилось, что в январе этого года Уоттс уже работал над новым сериалом по вселенной в стиле вестерна.
По данным инсайдера Knight Edge Media, в …
График релизов по Звёздным войнам на 2027 год 🔥
Учитывая все анонсы и слухи по состоянию на сегодняшний день, график релизов на 2027 год выглядит следующим образом:
• Второй сезон «Асоки» - 20 января;
• Переиздание «Новой надежды» - 19 февраля;
• Мероприятие «Star Wars Celebration» - 1 апреля;
• Фильм «Звёздный истребитель» - 28 мая;
• Второй сезон «Мол: Повелитель теней» - лето/осень;
• Третья часть игры «Star War…
Второй сезон «Асоки» углубится в историю Сестёр Ночи и откроет новые свойства Силы 😱
Дэйв Филони дал интервью изданию «Empire», в котором рассказал, что в продолжении сериала нам стоит ждать не только возвращение Властелинов Силы Мортиса, но и расширение лора Сестёр Ночи. Более того, нам покажут новые проявления Силы, которые мы раньше никогда не видели.
Можно сказать, что второй сезон привнесёт в Звёздные войны чт…
Всем привет, немного новостей от меня 🔥
В последнее время в Звёздных войнах почти ничего не происходит, за исключением недавно вышедшей игры Star Wars: Galactic Racer - обзор на неё сделаю в ближайшие пару дней, так что не переживайте, не забыл. Но в остальном пока затишье.
Ближайший проект - это 2-й сезон сериала «Асока», который выйдет 20 января. А до этого времени будем придумывать что-то другое. Но не волнуйтес…
Анонсирован кроссовер комиксов Marvel и Star Wars - показаны первые шесть выпусков 🔔
Это своего рода мультивселенная Marvel, в которой герои и злодеи Звёздных войн попали в Нью-Йорк. Всего представлено шесть выпусков с красочными иллюстрациями. Серия имеет подзаголовок «Star Wars/Marvel: Hope Assembles».
Выход этой необычной серии комиксов состоится 13 января 2027 года ⚡️
💩243🔥102👀29❤22👎19🤬10👍8
Signed Александр Лекарков
Showing the 12 most recent of 106 posts we hold for @swerok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MovieChannel @movie7channel · 22,330 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SWEROK - Звёздные Войны” (@swerok), 23,706 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swerok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.