Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -308. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,848–37,248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 20:58
36,894
-6
5 Nov 2026, 19:28
36,900
-11
4 Nov 2026, 18:10
36,911
-9
3 Nov 2026, 16:24
36,920
+1
2 Nov 2026, 13:56
36,919
-8
1 Nov 2026, 16:44
36,927
-3
31 Oct 2026, 19:18
36,930
-12
30 Oct 2026, 18:48
36,942
-1
29 Oct 2026, 20:29
36,943
-5
28 Oct 2026, 20:09
36,948
+1
27 Oct 2026, 18:06
36,947
-2
26 Oct 2026, 14:19
36,949
-7
25 Oct 2026, 14:35
36,956
-18
24 Oct 2026, 14:20
36,974
-8
23 Oct 2026, 16:55
36,982
-8
22 Oct 2026, 20:08
36,990
-3
21 Oct 2026, 17:58
36,993
-6
20 Oct 2026, 11:55
36,999
-7
19 Oct 2026, 09:56
37,006
-8
18 Oct 2026, 12:55
37,014
first reading
Engagement
329 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 173 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.09%
avg views ÷ 36,894 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,140
108 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
108
of 329 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 97 of 108 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
329 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
123,097
Reactions total
1,195
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17m 16s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,840 reactions across 276 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,793
46.7%
🔥
1,125
29.3%
👍
574
14.9%
😁
68
1.77%
❤🔥
35
0.911%
💯
32
0.833%
🥰
26
0.677%
🎉
25
0.651%
🤔
22
0.573%
🙏
21
0.547%
🍓
15
0.391%
🥴
15
0.391%
😭
12
0.313%
🤬
12
0.313%
😱
10
0.26%
💘
7
0.182%
🤯
7
0.182%
🙊
6
0.156%
🤨
6
0.156%
👌
5
0.13%
9 further kinds
24
0.625%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 285 of the 329 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,840 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 329 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.304%
1 of 329 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,360
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,210
over 328 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqwk3fbT
1
12 October 2026
12 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 329 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 108 posts held from the last 30 days (10.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Сегодня выступала на площадке «Мой бизнес» в рамках практической конференции «Большой бизнес в малых городах»
И знаете, что меня приятно удивило?!
Зал был полный! Оч много предпринимателей пришли на конференцию. Внимательно слушали, задавали вопросы, участвовали в бизнес-разборах.
Просто в этом году буквально из каждого утюга я слышу о том, что бизнес душат. Но активных предпринимателей, развивающихся, думающих о …
В продолжении темы про ошибки, на том же вебинаре ФНС разобрали топ-ошибок в декларации по УСН, которые чаще всего привлекают внимание налоговой.
Какие ошибки ФНС выделила среди типичных нарушений 👇🏻
1️⃣ Путать объекты налогообложения
Чаще всего это происходит, когда бухгалтер принимает информацию от предпринимателя на веру и не проверяет, какой объект налогообложения у него фактически выбран.
Например, ИП только …
ТОП-5 ошибок при совмещении УСН и ПСН по версии ФНС 🔥
ФНС рассказала, какие ошибки при совмещении УСН и ПСН выявляют налоговики и какие из них могут привести к доначислениям.
И речь не только о превышении лимитов 👇🏻
1️⃣ Превышение лимита доходов по патенту
В 2026 году лимит составляет 20 млн рублей.
Причём при совмещении УСН и ПСН для контроля лимита учитываются доходы по ОБОИМ режимам! Если лимит превышен, ИП т…
А теперь посмотрите на этот пример с другой стороны 👀
Представьте, что к вам обращается предприниматель с несколькими направлениями деятельности – вы анализируете его бизнес, просчитываете варианты налогообложения и предлагаете решение, которое позволяет законно сохранить патент.
Как думаете, сколько может стоить такая консультация?
Ведь это уже не просто расчёт налогов и сдача отчётности, это конкретная финансова…
Преимущество, о котором знают не все 👇🏻️️️️
Ещё один важный момент при выборе системы налогообложения - возможность совмещения ОСНО с патентом. Особенно актуален этот вопрос для предпринимателей, которые ведут несколько направлений деятельности.
Например, осуществляют розничную и оптовую торговлю.
▶️При совмещении ПСН и УСН для проверки лимита патента учитываются доходы от реализации по обоим налоговым режимам.
▶️…
Уверена, многие бухгалтеры даже не рассматривают общую систему налогообложения как альтернативу упрощёнке. Потому что ОСНО — это «сложно, дорого и вообще зачем, если можно остаться на УСН»?
Но давайте разбираться 🙌🏻
В 2027 году лимит доходов для освобождения от НДС на УСН составляет 20 млн рублей.
👉🏻 Предприниматели, которые утрачивают право на освобождение от НДС, должны определиться со ставкой НДС, которую они б…
📅 Расписание мероприятий в школе ЮлБи
Коллеги, впереди много интересного! Подготовила для вас расписание ближайших мероприятий 👇🏼
1️⃣Бесплатный курс «Бухгалтер ИП и маркетплейсов: закрываем 2026 без ошибок и планируем 2027»
Большой курс, на котором разберём актуальные вопросы учёта ИП и селлеров, нюансы НДС, налоговые риски и возможности профессионального роста бухгалтера
☑️ Уроки в записи уже доступны!
А 10–12 …
Алгоритм выбора системы налогообложения
Давайте посмотрим предметно: на что именно нужно опираться, когда вы выбираете режим, потому что выбор СНО – это всегда аналитика и алгоритм
1️⃣Контекст деятельности
Важно понять, чем именно занимается бизнес. Попадает ли деятельность под льготы, какие используются ОКВЭДы, есть ли особенности по налогам для этой сферы.
2️⃣Уровень дохода
Причём смотреть нужно не только на тек…
Как думаете, какая ошибка бухгалтера - самая дорогая?
Не опечатка в декларации, и не пропущенный срок 🙌🏻
Одна из самых дорогих ошибок бухгалтера - это неправильно выбранная система налогообложения. Особенно у ИП! Многие предприниматели выбирают СНО один раз, на старте бизнеса, и потом годами работают на ней, даже не задумываясь, насколько она выгодна сегодня 🙈️️️️️️
▶️Но бизнес не стоит на месте! Меняются обороты,…
А если серьёзно, работа с ИП - это далеко не только налоги и отчётность, это ещё и умение вовремя увидеть риски, предупредить предпринимателя и защитить его от дорогостоящих ошибок
На бесплатном курсе и этому будем учиться 😏
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 329 posts we hold for @upb_nalogi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@upb_nalogi edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @upb_nalogi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
10 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Polls
The 6 most recent of 27 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ИП планирует применять ПСН в 2028 году.
Какой предельный размер доходов за 2027 год позволит ему применять патент с 1 января 2028 года при соблюдении остальных условий?
20 млн рублей.6%
15 млн рублей.34%
10 млн рублей.60%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ИП применяет УСН и ПСН. В течение 2026 года вся деятельность велась только в рамках патента, а доходов по УСН не было.
Нужно ли представлять декларацию по УСН за 2026 год, если предприниматель сохранил этот режим?
Нет, поскольку доходов по УСН не было.2%
Нет, поскольку налоговая получает сведения о патенте автоматически.1%
Да, необходимо представить нулевую декларацию по УСН.97%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ИП применяет ПСН. За 2026 год его доход составил 14,8 млн рублей.
На 2027 год предприниматель получил патент с 1 января по 31 декабря 2027 года. В июле 2027 года доходы от деятельности на ПСН с начала года достигли 15,2 млн рублей.
С 1 августа 2027 года - месяца, следующего за месяцем превышения лимита.25%
С 1 января 2027 года - с начала налогового периода, на который выдан патент.70%
С 1 января 2028 года, поскольку в течение 2027 года патент продолжает действовать.5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ИП совмещает ОСНО и ПСН. За 2026 год доходы по ОСНО составили 40 млн рублей, а по патенту — 13 млн рублей.
Может ли ИП применять ПСН в 2027 году по критерию доходов?
Нет, поскольку совокупный доход составил 53 млн рублей.43%
Да, ОСНО и ПСН доходы - раздельно, для опред. лимита по патенту учитыв. доходы от деят. на ПСН53%
Да, но только после перехода с ОСНО на УСН.4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ИП совмещает УСН и ПСН. За 2026 год доходы по УСН составили 9 млн рублей, а по патенту — 7 млн рублей.
Сможет ли он применять патент с 1 января 2027 года?
Да, поскольку доходы по ПСН составили только 7 млн рублей.18%
Нет, поскольку суммарный доход по УСН и ПСН превысил 15 млн рублей.79%
Да, если на УСН применяется объект «доходы минус расходы».3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 329 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ряховский: Налоги без фильтра @ryahovskiynalogii · 35,290 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
Бухгалтерский квартал @buhgalteriaLL · 22,255 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 September 2026
Светлана Беляева | АФиНА @taxrisk · 25,262 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Евгения Мемрук бухгалтер @biznesinalogi_tlg · 81,921 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Нетипичный бухгалтер 🥇 @netipichniy_buh · 77,962 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Налог-Налог.ру @nalognalogru · 24,662 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Налоги для предпринимателей @businessololo · 24,398 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Система Главбух @sistemaglavbukh · 25,689 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
1С для бухгалтера ❤️ @buhi1c · 37,820 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Журнал "Главбух" @eglavbukru · 82,400 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Бухгалтерский юмор 🤪 @buhast · 31,063 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Канал "Учёт без забот" @uchetbezzabot_1c · 39,381 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
Налоги, законы и бизнес. Марат Самитов @oooavirta · 55,936 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Контур для бухгалтера @externjournal · 42,925 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Бухучет и налоги от «Клерк.Ру» @klerkonline · 20,478 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
Типичный Бухгалтер @typical_buh · 19,873 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 29 September 2026
Журнал "Упрощёнка" @uproshchenka · 22,735 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Самозанятые.рф @selfworkru · 30,754 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Бухучет, налоги, 1С @buhru · 35,222 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Переводчик с бухгалтерского @accwhisper · 50,511 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
ФНС России @nalog_gov_ru · 89,483 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
Бухэксперт @buhexpert8 · 75,314 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Рабочие лайфхаки: секреты и советы @lifehackoftheday · 25,867 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Финансовый директор | Мастер CFO @findir_pro · 44,293 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оксана Каверина | бухгалтерия, налоги и финансы” (@upb_nalogi), 36,894 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upb_nalogi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.